THE GOLDEN DAYS OF THE 50’s!

The music of the 50s was infectious and groundbreaking. Artists like Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry, Buddy Holly, and Little Richard revolutionized the soundscape with rock ‘n’ roll, setting the stage for future musical genres. Tunes from this era still evoke a sense of joy and nostalgia, making you want to get up and dance, even if your hips might protest a bit these days.

But the magic of the 50s wasn’t just in its music. The film clips from this decade are a delightful reminder of a time when Hollywood was churning out timeless classics. Think of the elegant grace of Audrey Hepburn in “Roman Holiday,” the raw magnetism of Marlon Brando in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” or the cheerful exuberance of Gene Kelly in “Singin’ in the Rain.” These films, and many others, continue to captivate audiences with their charm and artistry.

For the first couple of minutes, you might swear you’ve seen this nostalgic video before. It’s a familiar trip down memory lane, filled with beloved faces and sounds. But then…WOW! You’re treated to a whole new compilation that captures even more of the essence of the 50s. It’s a vibrant mix of memorable moments, blending the best of what the decade had to offer.

Those who grew up during this wonderful time were indeed lucky. The 1950s were marked by a unique blend of optimism and innovation. It was a period of post-war prosperity and cultural blossoming. Families gathered around black-and-white televisions, teenagers flocked to drive-in theatres, and everyone seemed to be part of a shared, joyous experience.

The 50s left an enduring legacy that still resonates today. It’s a testament to a bygone era where every day felt golden, filled with the promise of a bright future. Whether through the infectious beats of rock ‘n’ roll, the captivating allure of classic cinema, or the simple yet profound moments of daily life, the golden days of the 50s remain a cherished memory for many. So, take a moment to indulge in this delightful reminiscence and celebrate the magic of a time that continues to bring joy to our hearts.

CLICK LINK to watch this fabulous look back at the 50′

The 50s: A Pop Culture Tribute – YouTube (youtube-nocookie.com)

Australia’s Ghost Shark and America’s Manta Ray UUVs Transform Undersea Warfare

Australia and the United States have recently introduced advanced unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) prototypes, signalling a leap into a sci-fi reality. These UUVs, named Ghost Shark and Manta Ray, represent a major evolution in undersea warfare by offering new capabilities that reduce human risk during conflicts.

As technology rapidly advances, militaries are investing billions to maintain a competitive edge and signal their strength to potential adversaries. Unmanned drones have become integral to modern warfare, with predictions that they may eventually replace human soldiers on the battlefield. Military personnel, instead of being on the front lines, will be operating these machines from safe distances.

The use of drones in conflicts, extensively demonstrated by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, has drawn significant criticism from humanitarian groups due to the collateral damage they often cause. More recently, the Ukraine conflict has showcased the devastating effectiveness of drones, which have been used to drop bombs on enemy positions.

However, deploying drones underwater presents unique challenges. Unlike aerial and surface drones, UUVs cannot rely on satellites and radio waves for communication. They must contend with factors such as water temperature, salinity, and depth, which affect data transmission.

Described as “the most advanced undersea autonomous vehicles in the world,” these cutting-edge UUVs feature modular designs that support a variety of missions. For Australia, the Ghost Shark is expected to counter China’s encroachment into international waters and patrol the vast Australian coastline. According to Australia’s defence department, this UUV will provide the navy with a stealthy, long-range, autonomous capability for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and strike missions.

Vice Admiral Mark Hammond emphasized the importance of the Ghost Shark, stating, “We are a nation girt by sea, and the Ghost Shark is one of the tools we are developing for the navy to patrol and protect our oceans and our connection to the world.”

The US’s Manta Ray is designed for global deployment. It can be packed up and moved quickly, and its ability to hibernate on the ocean floor allows it to be pre-deployed and activated as needed. Dr. James Patton Rogers, a drone warfare expert, highlighted the strategic flexibility of the Manta Ray, noting its potential for deployment anywhere in the world.

Dr. Rogers also addressed concerns about the autonomy of these systems. “One of the most worrying characteristics of both drones is that they are far more autonomous than the underwater systems of the past. With increased levels of autonomy comes less human control, which may lead to machine errors or riskier deployments that could escalate existing tensions,” he explained.

These new UUVs, Ghost Shark and Manta Ray, mark a significant advancement in military technology, promising enhanced capabilities and strategic advantages while also raising important questions about the future of autonomous warfare.

 

Ian Plimer – We are victims of a fraud.

Ian Plimer is a prominent Australian geologist whose critical perspective on climate change challenges the mainstream narrative. As a professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne and a professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, Plimer brings considerable expertise and academic rigor to the discussion.

Plimer advocates for a more nuanced understanding of climate change, emphasizing that it is largely a natural phenomenon. He argues that human activities are not the primary drivers of recent global warming, a viewpoint he thoroughly explores in his book “Heaven and Earth: Global Warming – The Missing Science.” This work provides a comprehensive critique of mainstream climate science, questioning the methodologies and assumptions that underpin the consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

Supporters of Plimer’s views appreciate his willingness to challenge prevailing scientific dogmas and to highlight the complexities of climate systems. They argue that his research draws attention to important but often overlooked factors, such as natural climate variability, solar activity, and geological processes. Plimer’s academic background and detailed analysis lend credibility to his arguments, prompting a necessary re-examination of widely accepted theories.

Plimer’s perspective resonates with many who are skeptical of stringent regulatory measures aimed at reducing carbon emissions, advocating instead for balanced and evidence-based approaches to environmental stewardship. His contributions to the climate change debate underscore the importance of considering diverse viewpoints and maintaining scientific integrity in policy discussions.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1298388544211582?fs=e&s=cl&mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

Vietnam War, the Last Secrets

ED: I watched this 50 minute documentary yesterday afternoon I found it informative, it covers a number of topics with input from Vietnamese fighters. There is no mention of Australians or other allies, however I expected that to be the case.  

Death Notice Lieutenant Colonel Paul Feeney, RFD – RAA

We have received advice of the death on 18 May 2024, after a long battle with cancer, of Lt Col Paul Joseph Feeney RFD (Retd). He was 84. Paul served with the RAA from 1962 to 1990, including periods with the 11th, 5th and 5th/11th Field Regiments.

Paul participated in a Citizens Military Force (CMF) Officer Visit to 12th Field Regiment in Vietnam during September/October 1968. His final RAA posting was CO of 5th/11th Field Regiment from July 1978 to June 1981. After serving as CO he was a Tactics Instructor at 1st Training Group Wacol, Command and Staff Wing. Paul was a Life Subscriber of RAA Assn (Qld).

Funeral details to follow when available.

RIP Paul Joseph Feeney.

Peter Bruce, OAM
Obituary Resource Officer
RAAHC
[email protected]

Two comments on the Battle of Australia Article

Hi Ray,

As a “comment” to your article on the “Battle for Australia”, I have added a few lines on the little-known overflight of Geelong, Melbourne, Hobart, Auckland, Wellington and Suva by a “collapsible” Japanese” Glen” float-plane in February 1942 – ie launched from a mother-submarine in Bass Strait. If you choose to include it, it you might wish to use the photograph below of a E14Y Japanese Glen float-plane being launched from a “mother submarine” – see below:

Regards, Ernie Chamberlain

*********

I’d like to comment further on your article on the “Battle for Australia,” I would like to highlight an intriguing but little-known episode from World War II. In February 1942, a Japanese “Glen” floatplane conducted an overflight of several cities, including Geelong, Melbourne, Hobart, Auckland, Wellington, and Suva. This reconnaissance mission is notable due to the unique deployment method: the aircraft was launched from a Japanese I-25 submarine stationed in Bass Strait.

The “Glen” floatplane, designed for such covert operations, was stored in a disassembled state within a watertight hangar on the deck of the submarine. Upon reaching the designated area, the aircraft was quickly assembled and launched, demonstrating the reach and audacity of Japanese reconnaissance efforts during the war.

This operation underscores the strategic importance placed on gathering intelligence and the innovative tactics employed by the Japanese Navy. It also serves as a reminder of the broader scope of wartime activities in the Pacific region, extending beyond the well-documented battles and engagements. Understanding these lesser-known events can provide a more comprehensive view of the complexities and global nature of World War II.

Thanks

Dave Watson

FORD LOSING $100,000 PER EV PRODUCED

ED: This arrived last night from a mate is the US, it’s an article from a US motoring magazine. I couldn’t copy the photos.

Ford’s foray into electric vehicle (EV) production has encountered significant financial setbacks. Despite ambitious plans to transition towards electric mobility, the company has struggled to achieve profitability in its EV segment. According to Bloomberg, Ford’s losses per electric vehicle exceeded $100,000 in the first quarter of 2024, a stark increase from the previous year’s already substantial deficits. This substantial loss highlights several critical challenges facing Ford and the broader EV market.

Market Dynamics and Decreased Demand

The EV market, which initially showed promising growth, has recently faced a downturn. Factors contributing to the declining demand include high vehicle costs, limited charging infrastructure, and the economic uncertainty affecting consumer spending. As a result, Ford has had to reassess its production targets and scale back orders from battery suppliers, reflecting a broader industry trend of cautious investment amidst fluctuating market conditions.

Production and Supply Chain Challenges

Ford’s significant financial losses also stem from production and supply chain issues. The transition to EV production requires substantial upfront investment in new manufacturing technologies and processes. Additionally, the reliance on a complex supply chain for critical components, such as lithium-ion batteries, has exposed Ford to cost volatility and supply disruptions. These challenges have been exacerbated by global supply chain constraints, leading to increased production costs and delayed vehicle deliveries.

Competitive Landscape and Technological Barriers

The competitive landscape for EVs is intensely crowded, with established automakers and new entrants vying for market share. Companies like Tesla, which have a head start in EV technology and production, have set high benchmarks for cost efficiency and innovation. Ford, despite its legacy and resources, has found it challenging to compete on these fronts. The technological barriers in battery efficiency, range, and charging speed further complicate Ford’s efforts to close the gap with more established EV manufacturers.

Policy and Regulatory Uncertainties

Government policies and regulations play a crucial role in the adoption of EVs. While many regions offer incentives for EV purchases, these policies can be inconsistent and subject to change. Uncertainty around future regulations, such as emissions standards and subsidies, has added another layer of complexity to Ford’s EV strategy. The lack of a stable and supportive policy environment can deter consumers and investors, impacting the overall market growth.

Strategic Shifts and Future Prospects

In response to these challenges, Ford is likely to undertake strategic shifts. This may include focusing on more profitable segments, such as hybrid vehicles, or partnering with technology firms to enhance their EV capabilities. Additionally, Ford might explore alternative business models, like subscription services or fleet sales, to mitigate risks and stabilize revenues.

Despite these setbacks, Ford remains committed to its long-term vision of electrification. The company has announced plans to invest heavily in EV infrastructure, including the development of a dedicated EV platform and the expansion of its charging network. These initiatives are aimed at positioning Ford to capitalize on the anticipated future growth of the EV market.

Conclusion

Ford’s experience underscores the broader challenges and uncertainties facing the automotive industry’s shift towards electrification. While the financial losses are significant, they also highlight the need for strategic adaptation and innovation. As Ford navigates these turbulent waters, its actions will serve as a valuable case study for other automakers and stakeholders in the evolving EV landscape.

.