Most Australians Are Sick of Being Guilt-Tripped by a Historical Grievance Narrative

SBS News Watch

The rejection of the Voice referendum in 2023 was a clear indication that the majority of Australians have had enough of being lectured and shamed over historical grievances. The attempt to entrench a race-based advisory body in the Constitution was overwhelmingly dismissed, showing that Australians prefer unity over division and merit over victimhood.

Most Australians support keeping Australia Day on January 26, recognising it as a celebration of the nation’s achievements rather than an occasion for self-flagellation. We acknowledge that history, like life, is complex, and while there have been injustices, our country has also provided countless opportunities and a high standard of living. Australians can lead fulfilling lives by making sound choices, avoiding destructive influences, and taking responsibility for their actions. Perpetual blame on “colonialism” fosters resentment and unhappiness rather than progress.

This is why professional grievance activists are losing credibility. Their constant negativity does nothing to improve lives; instead, they seek to spread discontent. It is regrettable that so many young Australians graduate from universities burdened with debt, only to be indoctrinated with the notion that their ancestors were bigots. Such teaching cultivates a perpetual victim mentality, weakening individuals and limiting their potential. However, there is hope—those who reject this divisive ideology can still enjoy the freedoms and opportunities this country provides.

The so-called “Invasion Day” rallies exemplify the toxicity of this mindset. The demonstrations were filled with angry rhetoric and hateful slogans such as “Watch Out Whites” and “Death to Australia.” Such sentiments do nothing to advance reconciliation or improve the lives of Indigenous Australians. Instead, they are the expressions of bitter individuals more interested in tearing down than in building a better future.

Unfortunately, the government has failed to address this type of racial hate speech. While stringent laws exist to punish inflammatory language from certain groups, radical demonstrators seem to enjoy a free pass. A fair and just society does not tolerate hate speech from any side. If Australians are to live together harmoniously, then the government must ensure that divisive and violent rhetoric is condemned and addressed regardless of its source.

Yet, there is a silver lining. This Australia Day, a shift in sentiment was noticeable—one of gratitude and resilience rather than shame. Many Australians are rejecting the constant guilt-tripping and choosing instead to celebrate their heritage with pride. Those who have sought to weaponise history for their own agendas have overplayed their hand, and a growing number of Australians are pushing back.

Perhaps, in the near future, we will no longer be forced to rehash this divisive debate each year. The tide is turning towards common sense, unity, and an appreciation for our shared national story.

 

President Donald Trump and the Challenge of Ending the Ukraine Conflict

The Krakow Post

President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated his desire to end the war in Ukraine swiftly, but the feasibility of such an outcome remains uncertain. Initially pledging to resolve the conflict within 24 hours, Trump and his advisers have since revised this timeline to a more measured three-to-six-month period. Key to his approach is an early meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, alongside ongoing U.S. diplomatic engagement with Kyiv.

For Putin, a direct dialogue with Washington serves his strategic interests, reinforcing Russia’s status as a global power. Given past encounters, such as the 2018 Helsinki summit, Putin may believe he can leverage negotiations in his favour. He also perceives himself as holding the upper hand in a war of attrition where Russian forces have made incremental but costly advances, while relentless missile strikes have damaged Ukraine’s infrastructure.

Western nations, meanwhile, face internal political and economic challenges. Putin calculates that growing divisions and uncertainty over Trump’s commitment to NATO will lead the West to ease its support for Kyiv, thus creating an opening for a favourable settlement. However, any negotiation on Putin’s terms would likely require Ukrainian capitulation, which is not in the West’s interests.

Putin’s primary goal remains unchanged: bringing Ukraine under Russian influence, securing control over annexed territories, and preventing Ukraine from aligning with Western institutions. A mere ceasefire will not satisfy him; he will demand recognition of Russia’s territorial claims and enforce Ukrainian neutrality. This aligns with his broader objective of reshaping Europe’s security architecture to Russia’s advantage, a goal evident in Moscow’s demands before its 2022 invasion.

If Trump prioritizes a quick deal, he may push Ukraine to accept a ceasefire along current battle lines, potentially at the cost of territorial concessions. However, without ironclad Western security guarantees, such an agreement would only provide Russia with an opportunity to regroup and resume hostilities once Western focus shifts elsewhere.

A more effective strategy would be to strengthen Ukraine’s position before any negotiations. This would involve increasing military and economic aid to Kyiv while intensifying sanctions on Moscow, thereby pressuring Russia’s already strained economy. Putin seeks relief from Western sanctions to reduce his dependence on China, but granting such concessions prematurely would undermine Western leverage.

Early indications from the Trump administration suggest a willingness to escalate pressure on Moscow should Putin refuse to negotiate. However, achieving a sustainable peace requires more than short-term agreements. It demands a clear recognition of Russia’s broader strategic ambitions and a firm commitment from the U.S. and its allies to counter them effectively. The ultimate challenge for the new administration will be whether it is prepared to confront these realities head-on.

Converted to English

ADF is ‘not able to recruit’ enough people to meet government targets

Former Australian Army Chief Peter Leahy says the ADF is “not able to recruit” enough people to meet the government’s targets. The Australian Defence Force continues to struggle to find new recruits despite government incentives. The ADF has failed to meet its recruitment targets since 2012, with a projected shortfall of 5,000 personnel by July.

How Much Military Aid Has Australia Donated to Ukraine?

The war in Ukraine has been ongoing for over three years, bringing widespread destruction, humanitarian crises, and economic instability that have reverberated across the globe. The conflict has resulted in thousands of casualties, millions of displaced people, and severe disruptions to global food and energy markets, affecting nations far beyond Europe.

Since the beginning of the invasion, Australia has remained steadfast in its support for Ukraine, taking a strong stance against Russian aggression. The Australian government has imposed over 1,200 sanctions targeting Russian individuals, entities, and sectors critical to the Kremlin’s war effort, including financial institutions, defence industries, and energy exports.

In addition to economic measures, Australia has provided significant military aid, including armoured vehicles, ammunition, drones, and other essential equipment to bolster Ukraine’s defence capabilities. Humanitarian assistance has also been a key component of Australia’s response, with substantial funding allocated to support refugees, provide medical aid, and assist in rebuilding critical infrastructure.

Australia’s commitment to Ukraine reflects broader international efforts to uphold sovereignty, deter aggression, and maintain stability in the region. As the war continues, Australia remains a key ally, reinforcing diplomatic pressure, contributing to reconstruction efforts, and standing with the Ukrainian people in their fight for independence and security.

Too Little, Too Late: Albanese’s Failure on Antisemitism Exposed

The attempted targeting of Sydney’s Great Synagogue and Jewish Museum has revealed a disturbing truth: Australia’s Jewish community has been under attack for months while the federal government failed to act. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s recent condemnation of antisemitic activity rings hollow after 15 months of inaction, during which violent incidents and hate-fuelled threats have escalated.

The discovery of explosives in a caravan in Dural on January 19, along with information regarding key Jewish sites in Sydney, underscores the severity of the threat. Police now believe this plot is linked to months of orchestrated antisemitic attacks, yet the government has only now found its voice. The Prime Minister’s vow to “hunt down and lock up” perpetrators is too little, too late. Where was this determination a year ago when Jewish schools, synagogues, and businesses first raised the alarm?

Despite growing evidence of coordination among extremist elements, authorities have been slow to respond. Several individuals on the periphery of the Dural caravan plot, including Scott Marshall and Tammie Farrugia, are in custody on unrelated charges, but the masterminds remain at large. Peter Wertheim of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry has warned that until the “puppet masters” are apprehended, the community remains at risk. Rabbi Benjamin Elton of the Great Synagogue has been advised to alter his daily route for safety—a sobering reality for Australian Jews in 2025.

While the government defends its handling of the crisis, the Jewish community and security experts tell a different story. Private security firms have seen a surge in demand for protection at Jewish institutions, filling the void left by an unresponsive government. Meanwhile, ASIO director general Mike Burgess has ruled out raising the terror threat level, despite clear evidence of organised and escalating antisemitic activity.

Even international figures are calling out the government’s failure. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar has condemned the spread of antisemitism in Australia as “almost unchecked,” demanding stronger action. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has also criticised the government’s passive response, rightly pointing out that leadership means proactive prevention, not reactive platitudes.

Prime Minister Albanese had over a year to take meaningful action against the rise in antisemitism. Instead, he waited until a near-tragedy forced his hand. Condemnation after the fact does nothing to restore trust or provide security to a community under siege. The time for decisive leadership was 15 months ago—now, it may be too late.

Australia Extends Collins-Class Submarine Fleet to Strengthen Defence

SeaWatch Blog

Australia is undertaking a major modernisation of its six Collins-class diesel-electric submarines, extending their service life into the 2030s. This $4-$5 billion project aims to maintain a credible undersea deterrent while awaiting the arrival of nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS agreement. The upgrades will enhance Australia’s ability to patrol its vast maritime domain, secure vital trade routes, and counter China’s growing naval presence.

The Australian government is increasingly concerned about rising geopolitical tensions, particularly China’s assertive military expansion. In May 2023, a Chinese J-10 fighter jet fired flares at an Australian naval helicopter enforcing North Korea sanctions over the Yellow Sea. This provocation underscored the importance of a strong defence strategy. Submarines are a key element in this approach, providing a stealthy and effective means of deterrence.

The Collins-class submarines, widely regarded as among the best diesel-electric boats in the world, are undergoing a life-of-type extension (LOTE) at Osborne shipyard in South Australia. This upgrade is critical to ensuring Australia maintains an effective undersea capability until nuclear-powered vessels arrive under AUKUS. The investment highlights the government’s commitment to defence and securing maritime trade routes, which are essential for the nation’s resource-driven economy.

Originally designed in the 1980s to replace the aging Oberon-class, the Collins-class submarines were developed with long-range capabilities to suit Australia’s geographic isolation. First delivered between 1996 and 2003, they became the country’s first indigenously built submarines, drawing inspiration from Sweden’s Type 471 design. Their primary roles include attacking enemy ships, countering hostile submarines, and gathering intelligence.

Each Collins-class submarine measures 255 feet in length, displaces 3,000 tons, and operates with a quiet diesel-electric propulsion system. They require a crew of 42 and are armed with MK 48 heavyweight torpedoes and Harpoon anti-ship missiles. The six boats—HMAS Collins, Farncomb, Waller, Dechaineux, Sheean, and Rankin—form the backbone of Australia’s current submarine force.

As Australia navigates an increasingly volatile security environment, modernising the Collins-class fleet ensures continued operational capability. These submarines will serve as a critical stopgap until nuclear-powered vessels are commissioned. The government’s proactive approach reflects its awareness that regional tensions are escalating, making a strong naval force essential for national security and economic stability.

The Collins-class upgrades will also sustain Australia’s defence industry, preserving technical expertise and jobs. With the AUKUS agreement set to deliver nuclear-powered submarines in the coming years, maintaining a robust submarine force in the interim is vital. Australia’s maritime security strategy underscores the necessity of deterrence, ensuring the nation is prepared for future challenges in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region.

 

 

Here is this week’s Smile

Ethel had checked into a motel on her 65th birthday. She was lonely and a little depressed at her advancing age, so decided to risk an adventure. She thought, “I’ll call one of those men you see advertised in phone books for escorts and sensual massages.”

She looked through the phone book, found a full-page ad for a guy calling himself Tender Tony, a very handsome man with assorted physical skills flexing in the photo. He had all the right muscles in all the right places, thick wavy hair, long powerful legs, dazzling smile, six pack abs and she felt quite certain she could bounce a dime off his well-oiled buns …….

She figured, what the heck, nobody will ever know. I’ll give him a call.

“Good evening, ma’am, how may I help you?”

Oh my, he sounded soooo sexy!

Afraid she would lose her nerve if she hesitated, she rushed right in, “I hear you give a great massage. I’d like you to come to my motel room and give me one. No, wait, I should be straight with you. I’m in town all alone and what I really want is sex. I want it hot, and I want it now. Bring implements, toys, everything you’ve got in your bag of tricks. We’ll go at it all night – tie me up, cover me in chocolate syrup and whipped cream, anything and everything, I’m ready! Now how does that sound?”

He said, “That sounds absolutely fantastic, but you need to press 9 for an outside line.”

Have your say: Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy

 Have your say: Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy

28 January 2025

Whether you have or know someone who has served in the Australian Defence Force (ADF), all Australians are encouraged to have their say on the Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy Exposure Draft. The veteran community were consulted in late 2023, and now the Australian public are invited to share their thoughts.

Any and all Australians can participate, including veterans, current serving ADF members, and families plus organisations that have an interest or role in supporting the Defence and veteran community.

Feedback will help inform what is important when it comes to supporting the mental health and wellbeing of our Defence and veteran community.

The Exposure Draft is available to download here.

Feedback may be provided by:

·         answering specific questions in the exposure draft survey 

·         entering or uploading a written submission in the submission portal.

Your feedback will inform the finalisation of the Strategy. Consultation on the Exposure Draft is now open and will close at 5:00 pm Friday 7 March 2025.

The Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy is jointly developed by DVA and Defence to guide how the government provides support to current and former serving ADF members. The strategy is set to be finalised later this year.

For more information visit the Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy webpage.

Information and conversations about mental health and suicide might be distressing to some people.

In the case of an emergency call 000.

If you need support:

·         Open Arms – Veterans and Families Counselling provides free and confidential counselling to anyone who has served at least one day in the ADF and their families via a 24-hours helpline 1800 011 046

·         All-hours Support Line, a confidential telephone service for ADF members and their families is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week 1800 628 036

·         Defence Member and Family Support Helpline 1800 624 608

·         13YARN  (national crisis support line for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) 13 92 76

·         Griefline (support for experiencing loss and grief) 1300 845 745

·         QLife (LGBTI peer support and referral for people wanting to talk about sexuality, identity, gender, bodies, feelings or relationships) 1800 184 527

·         Lifeline Australia (crisis support) 13 11 14

·         Suicide Call Back 1300 659 467

·         Kids Help Line (phone counselling service) 1800 551 800

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER

ED: From my inbox by John Clarkson.

Tuesday 28th January 2025.

To:     The Prime Minister of Australia – Hon. Mr Anthony Albanese, MP;

Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet;

The Leader of the Opposition – Hon. Mr Peter Dutton, MP;

Liberal Party Headquarters – Canberra.

For Information:

The Federal Member for Longman – Hon. Mr Terry Young, MP.

 

Rise of Antisemitism in Australia.

Gentlemen,

         It is no secret that I have written several letters regarding the very real problems concerning Israel and the terrorist group ‘HAMAS’, and the embarrassing lack of real action by our Australian Government.  The very first letter I wrote on this matter was in mid October 2023, seeking the type of action our nation intended to take to support our ally.

         Sadly, in the many months since, we as a nation, have done very little to support our important ally.  The very fact that Australia regards Israel as an ally is a very important bi-partisan fact.  One of the strongest supporters of Israel in the last 50 years has been the courageous Mr Bob Hawke.

         However, since the recent 80th anniversary of the Holocaust, held at the infamous Auschwitz camp, the rise of antisemitism in our country has risen to an unacceptable level.  So, what can be done?  Before I describe ‘what should have been done?’ I must emphasise right now that any future statements and/or action MUST have a bi-partisan backing.  From now on, irrespective of party politics, or irrespective of any prospective election coming in the wings, ALL actions, ALL statements MUST have a bi-partisan backing.  I look forward to our Prime Minister commanding an urgent meeting with his inner cabinet and creating a plan to defeat the antisemitism in this country.  Once their plan is created, I would hope that our Prime Minister would then make a public statement and actually give the necessary COMMAND for the removal of antisemitism.  Yes, it will take incredible bravery for any national leader to actually head off the rise of this nasty antisemitism.

         Now, I wish to describe the actions which our national Parliament SHOULD have taken on Monday 9th October 2023.  That Monday was the first sitting day of parliament following the terrorist attack by the Hamas group on Israel soil.  If I remember correctly, the Prime Minister gave one very short comment on the fact that this event actually happened.  Such inaction by a strong ally of Israel is grossly unforgiveable!

         So, what should have happened?  When the Prime Minister announced in parliament a short description of the event and then sat down, the Leader of the Opposition should have been on his feet in 5 milliseconds and asked the entire Parliament to debate the steps and action our nation should take in defence of our ally, Israel.  He also should have stated his bipartisan support of any Government action recommended to defend Israel against its enemies.  Sadly, this did not happen.  Yes, if Australia and other allies of Israel had have acted in support of Israel in the first week or two following the terrorist attack, it is highly likely that this ‘war’ we now have would have lasted less than a month.

         However, now that we have gone over 15 months since the terrorist attack, such thoughts on “What should have been done” are now useless.  We, as a nation, need to focus on what actions we can take, in liaison with any other ally of Israel, to help in the defeat of the terrorist group, Hamas.  As we were once a strong ally of Israel, they must look on Australia with a very disappointed look.  Yes, they have been let down.

         Now is not the time to make comforting comments to our people saying how disappointed our leaders are with the current state of affairs.  Now is the time to coordinate an action plan, with bipartisan support, for our nation to pull together and defeat this enemy.  We as a nation, have done this before, albeit a generation ago, but when we pull together, we can do it.

         Therefore, stop making nice comments to the press, get together and start making plans.  Our nation needs action and that has to be a bipartisan action.  So, put all your petty party politics behind you and start defending your nation.

 Yours Sincerely

 John Clarkson.

 (Sergeant – RAAF – Retired).

  (Veteran of Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam Campaigns).