I just want to let you know that I won’t be posting to Frontline tomorrow as I have exciting Australia Day plans lined up that will keep me busy from early morning. The day kicks off at Coolangatta Beach, where I’ll soak in the festive atmosphere and enjoy the stunning views and surf. From there, we’ll head to our daughter’s home on the Tweed River, where we’ll continue the celebrations with a great gathering of family and friends.

Australia Day is a special occasion to come together, reflect, and celebrate all that makes our nation unique, and I hope you, too, have plans to mark the day in your own way. Whether you’re spending it with family, friends, or enjoying a BBQ some quiet beers, may it be a day filled with joy, pride, and appreciation for our incredible country.

Cheers

Ray & Julie

CO2 is a foundational nutrient necessary for all life on Earth. Scientific evidence supports that increasing atmospheric CO2 has significantly contributed to agricultural productivity, with global vegetation thriving from the near-polar regions to the equator. NASA has confirmed this greening of the Earth, attributing it largely to rising CO2 levels. At 420 parts per million (ppm), the current CO2 concentration remains historically low compared to the average of 2,600 ppm over geologic time. Plants require a minimum of 150 ppm to survive, making CO2 an indispensable component of the Earth’s ecosystem.

Critics argue that labelling CO2 as a pollutant contradicts scientific data and undermines its vital role in sustaining life. Today’s CO2 levels, although higher than pre-industrial times, are far below historical peaks. The evidence indicates that increased CO2 enhances plant growth and contributes to ecological health and agricultural yields. Far from being an “existential threat,” CO2 is crucial for life on Earth.

A growing resistance to the politicisation of climate science. The benefits of CO2 and challenge the economic and environmental impact of policies driven by climate alarmism. Good leadership underscores the need to abandon the notion of CO2 as a pollutant, recognising it instead as a critical nutrient.

Efforts to achieve net zero, driven by a misguided climate agenda, risk undermining economic stability and hindering genuine progress. The narrative surrounding climate change has been heavily influenced by financial interests tied to the renewable energy sector, leading to exaggerated claims about the impact of CO2 and natural temperature variations. Contrary to the prevailing rhetoric, there is no substantial evidence of an increase in extreme weather events. Furthermore, cold-related deaths significantly outnumber those caused by heat, emphasising the need for balanced and practical energy policies.

As nations like the United States and Canada reassess their climate strategies, it is crucial for governments to prioritise scientific accuracy and practical solutions over fear-driven agendas. The Albanese government’s commitment to net zero should be reevaluated to prevent economic damage and unnecessary restrictions on CO2, a gas essential for life and prosperity.

The modest, gradual warming of the Earth as it recovers from the Little Ice Age has been wrongly labelled a “crisis,” reflecting the greed-driven distortion of facts by those with vested interests in renewable energy.

China has reportedly unveiled a groundbreaking drone capable of seamlessly transitioning between underwater and aerial operations, marking a significant leap in military technology. These submarine-launched drones, designed with an innovative foldable wing mechanism, boast enhanced survivability in marine battlefields, according to Chinese claims.

The development comes as Beijing expresses concerns over the United States potentially deploying underwater drones near Chinese waters to execute swarm attacks on the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) during a possible conflict over Taiwan. Chinese researchers assert that their drones surpass the capabilities of the Pentagon’s unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs).

Named “Feiyi”, the drone was developed by teams from Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU) and the China Aerodynamics Research and Development Centre (CARDC). It features a unique design that enables it to traverse water and air multiple times within a single mission, making it the first of its kind. The foldable wing design allows the drone to minimise water resistance during underwater operations while retaining high manoeuvrability in the air.

Feiyi is equipped with tail-mounted propellers for propulsion and navigation underwater and four pairs of rotating, foldable blades for aerial flight. Its ability to transition seamlessly between mediums enhances its stealth and adaptability, enabling it to perform marine reconnaissance, surveillance, and strike missions. Reports suggest that its underwater navigation efficiency surpasses most existing cross-medium drones, thanks to the advanced wing-folding technology.

The drone can maintain stability even in rough waves and launch into the air with ease. When landing, it submerges within five seconds as its wings fold to reduce drag. Powered by artificial intelligence, Feiyi can autonomously execute missions with high precision, according to its developers.

In contrast, U.S. drones typically require deployment via torpedo tubes and lack underwater mobility, leaving them more vulnerable to detection and attack.

China’s advancements in cross-medium drones reflect its broader ambitions in military innovation, including hypersonic weapons and solid-fuel ramjet engines. With escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait, reports by think tanks like the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS) predict that drones like Feiyi could play a pivotal role in shaping the future of warfare.

eWise Blog

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) faces increasing challenges in recruiting and retaining hard-to-find experts, such as specialist engineers. Current systems lack the flexibility demanded by the 21st century and fail to match industry salary standards. These issues were highlighted in the Strategic Review of the Australian Defence Force Reserves, which emphasises the need for a Total Workforce System supporting innovative workforce arrangements.

As ADF tasks grow more complex, a potential solution lies in adapting the existing Specialist Services Officer (SSO) system. This program currently engages professionals in fields like healthcare, finance, law, engineering, and education without requiring full military training. To meet modern demands, this system could evolve into a broader Specialist Service Person (SSP) framework. The SSP system would expand beyond predefined fields to cover any role the ADF requires, allowing for greater operational flexibility.

This approach would enable the ADF to recruit a wider range of specialists and reassign existing personnel with valuable skills to roles where they are most needed. The SSP system could also replace the trial Specialist Service Soldier scheme, focusing on specific trades. For instance, if the ADF needs expertise in sanitation engineering for a mission, the SSP system could provide a pathway for such specialists to contribute without existing category constraints.

The SSP model would support both civilian recruits and reservists with specialised skills, using Continuous Full-Time Service (CFTS) contracts to call upon specialists as needed. This model mirrors the reserves, allowing specialists to move in and out of roles based on operational demands. It would also reduce reliance on contracted external civilian expertise, which often introduces additional costs and conflicts of interest. Instead, these skills could be sourced directly from SSP personnel under CFTS contracts.

Competitive salaries under the SSP system would address the current pay disparity between ADF roles and private industry, improving retention and recruitment. Inspiration can be drawn from the U.S. Warrant Officer system, which retains technical experts as specialists, and Singapore’s Military Domain Experts Scheme, which recruits civilian specialists to meet evolving defence needs.

Additionally, the SSP system could reengage personnel who might otherwise leave due to medical conditions or other limitations. If they possess in-demand skills, tailored CFTS contracts could define their duties and compensation, retaining valuable expertise within the ADF.

Flexibility is essential for the ADF to meet its growing and diverse skill requirements. Adopting the SSP framework offers a sustainable path to modernise workforce structures, ensuring the ADF remains competitive and capable in an ever-changing landscape.

The Gotland-class submarine, developed by Sweden in the 1990s, marked a pivotal shift in naval warfare and submarine technology, altering the balance of power in underwater operations. Designed with cutting-edge advancements, this class of submarines combined stealth, endurance, and versatility, fundamentally influencing how navies around the world approached submarine development and deployment.

At the heart of the Gotland-class’s revolutionary design was its air-independent propulsion (AIP) system, powered by Stirling engines. This technology allowed the submarine to remain submerged for extended periods without surfacing to recharge batteries, a limitation that plagued traditional diesel-electric submarines. The AIP capability significantly enhanced stealth and survivability, making the Gotland-class nearly undetectable by conventional anti-submarine measures.

The Gotland-class’s impact became globally recognised during joint exercises with the United States Navy. In 2005, the Swedish Navy leased the HMS Gotland to the U.S. for training purposes, where it outperformed American nuclear-powered submarines and even simulated successful “attacks” on aircraft carriers. This performance highlighted vulnerabilities in existing anti-submarine warfare (ASW) strategies and emphasised the growing threat posed by modern, non-nuclear submarines.

Beyond its military significance, the Gotland-class underscored Sweden’s ingenuity in naval engineering, showcasing that smaller nations could produce world-leading technology. Its influence extended globally, prompting other navies to prioritise AIP systems and rethink submarine design. Today, many advanced diesel-electric submarines, including Germany’s Type 212 and Japan’s Soryu-class, owe their capabilities to the trail blazed by the Gotland-class.

In essence, the Gotland-class submarine reshaped naval history by redefining the standards for stealth, efficiency, and operational endurance in underwater warfare, proving that innovation could challenge even the most powerful fleets in the world.

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has established itself as a global leader in first-person view (FPV) drone racing, a cutting-edge sport that has captured public attention and gained viral popularity on social media. This achievement highlights how competitive military sports can drive advancements in dual-use technology while cultivating the technological expertise of the next generation.

Military sports have long been tied to capability development, from the Olympic Pentathlon to modern events like the Military World Games. Such competitions not only hone skills in peacetime but also strengthen international relations, serving as effective soft power tools. FPV drone racing, a recent addition to military sports, exemplifies this tradition. It fosters proficiency in a disruptive battlefield technology—compact drones that enhance situational awareness and tactical flexibility at a fraction of the cost of traditional military systems.

Initially adapted for combat by the Ukrainian military to address shortages in precision-guided munitions, FPV drones have become invaluable for conventional warfare. Their affordability, accessibility, and adaptability have driven their widespread adoption for both battlefield and recreational use. Recognising their potential, the Australian and British armies formed military drone racing teams in 2017 and 2018, culminating in the inaugural Military International Drone Racing Tournament in Sydney in 2018. The ADF’s dominance in this arena, with consecutive championship wins in 2018, 2023, and 2024, underscores its commitment to the field.

The ADF has gone further by launching the ADF Drone Racing Association in 2023 and popularising the hashtag #SendIt! to promote the sport. These efforts not only ensure ongoing excellence in drone racing but also serve as a platform for innovation in drone design, pilot training, and battlefield tactics. The tournaments encourage teams to develop cutting-edge drones leveraging smartphone technologies, such as microprocessors, high-definition cameras, and miniaturised components.

Beyond competition, the ADF uses FPV drone racing to inspire STEM education. Pilots engage with students through demonstrations, workshops, and boot camps, emphasising the critical role of STEM skills across the military. While the thrill of racing drives participants, the ultimate mission remains clear: advancing drone technology for defence applications and nurturing a culture of innovation. The ADF’s efforts in FPV drone racing exemplify how military sports can bridge technological progress and educational outreach, preparing the next generation for future challenges.

A seismic shift in public opinion has solidified January 26 as Australia’s national day, with a significant majority of Australians now voicing support for keeping the date unchanged. The latest Resolve Political Monitor data reveals that 61 per cent of Australians want to retain January 26 as Australia Day, a substantial increase from 47 per cent just two years ago. Simultaneously, support for moving the holiday has plummeted from 39 per cent in January 2023 to a mere 24 per cent.

The Voice Referendum and Changing Sentiments

The marked shift in sentiment coincides with the aftermath of the Voice to Parliament referendum, a polarising debate that appears to have reshaped national perspectives on Indigenous issues and broader questions of identity. The referendum’s decisive rejection underscored a growing resistance to policies perceived as granting undue entitlements to Indigenous Australians, reflecting a desire for a more unified national approach.

Many Australians are reconsidering long-standing narratives around Australia Day, viewing January 26 as a unifying occasion to celebrate the achievements and resilience of a modern, multicultural nation rather than a date defined solely by its colonial origins. While some Indigenous Australians and their supporters continue to argue that the date represents pain and dispossession, the broader public’s stance suggests a diminishing appetite for symbolic gestures that divide rather than unite.

Key Demographics Reveal Diverging Views

Support for Australia Day’s current date varies sharply by age and political affiliation. Younger Australians aged 18 to 34 remain the most hesitant, with only 35 per cent backing January 26. In contrast, 63 per cent of those aged 35-54 and an overwhelming 79 per cent of Australians over 55 support the date.

The divide is also evident along political lines. Among Coalition voters, a resounding 78 per cent support keeping January 26, compared to a slimmer majority of 51 per cent of Labor voters. These figures suggest that traditional values and national pride resonate more strongly with older and more conservative demographics, while younger Australians remain more open to reconsidering the date, albeit in declining numbers.

The Broader Implications

This trend signals a broader cultural shift, where Australians are increasingly skeptical of campaigns centered on historical grievances. Many argue that the focus should instead be on practical measures to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians, such as education, health, and economic opportunities, rather than symbolic actions like changing Australia Day.

The debate around Australia Day is emblematic of a wider move away from what some perceive as divisive identity politics. As Australia continues to grapple with its history, the growing support for January 26 reflects a public yearning for cohesion and pride in shared achievements.

A Turning Point for National Identity

As the nation approaches another Australia Day, the message from the public is clear: Australians overwhelmingly prefer to celebrate their national day on January 26. This date, while complex in its historical context, has become a cornerstone of national identity—a day to reflect, celebrate, and look forward as one people.

Rather than focusing on divisive debates, there is an opportunity to reframe the narrative of Australia Day, emphasizing unity and progress while acknowledging the past. With support for the date at a record high, Australia stands at a pivotal moment to strengthen its sense of national identity, ensuring that January 26 remains a day for all Australians.

In recent years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a surge in illegal immigration, with thousands of individuals arriving on its shores by small boats. This issue has raised significant concerns, particularly when analysing the demographics of those arriving. Alarmingly, the number of military-age males entering the country illegally appears to have surpassed the total strength of the British Army.

According to reports, the British Army’s strength currently stands at approximately 76,000 active personnel, a number that has been steadily declining due to budget cuts and recruitment challenges. In contrast, figures from the UK Home Office and border authorities indicate that tens of thousands of individuals, predominantly military-age men, have crossed the English Channel in small boats in the past few years.

For instance, in 2023 alone, over 45,000 illegal migrants arrived in the UK via small boats. While precise data on the demographics is scarce, estimates suggest that a significant majority are young men between the ages of 18 and 35—the same age bracket typically associated with military service.

The disproportionate presence of military-age males among the arrivals has sparked debates about national security and the potential risks associated with such an influx. Critics argue that this demographic could pose a security threat if proper vetting and integration measures are not implemented. While the majority of these individuals may be fleeing conflict or seeking better economic opportunities, the lack of adequate checks raises concerns about the possibility of criminal elements or extremist ideologies entering the country undetected.

Beyond security concerns, the sheer number of arrivals has placed immense pressure on the UK’s infrastructure and public services. Accommodation facilities are overwhelmed, with many migrants housed in hotels at significant taxpayer expense. Health services, education, and local authorities are also struggling to cope with the additional demand.

The UK government has implemented various measures to curb illegal immigration, including agreements with France to increase patrols and surveillance in the Channel, as well as proposals to deport illegal migrants to third countries like Rwanda. However, these measures have faced legal and logistical challenges, limiting their effectiveness.

Critics argue that the UK’s asylum system is being exploited and that a more robust approach is needed. This includes stricter border controls, expedited processing of asylum claims, and deportation of those whose claims are unfounded. Additionally, there have been calls for increased investment in the British Army to ensure national security and address recruitment shortfalls.

The comparison between the number of illegal arrivals and the size of the British Army highlights broader issues facing the UK, including declining military strength and challenges in immigration policy. It underscores the need for a comprehensive strategy to address illegal immigration while bolstering the nation’s defence capabilities.

As the debate continues, it is clear that the UK must strike a balance between providing refuge to those in genuine need and safeguarding its borders and national interests. Failure to address these challenges effectively could have long-term implications for the country’s security, economy, and social cohesion.

It is an extremely iconic building, known for its massive size, importance, and especially its shape. Have you ever wondered why it has 5 sides?

ED: This email from Tim Britten was in my in box this morning.

Good morning guys

I just wanted to draw your attention to the plight of law-abiding licenced gun owners of Western Australia.

By now many of you would be aware of the dictatorship that the West Australian community is living under after the landslide election win of the state Labor Party and almost complete destruction of

the state opposition.

Translation – WA Labor can do whatever they want when enforcing their over the top leftist green ideology.

How does this effect the ADF and its ability to recruit new Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen?

Current new laws in West Australia relating to the new Firearms Act is all but out lawing firearm ownership in this state. This has been done by making it so incredibly hard to own a firearm, to harvest your own meat or assist the state through destruction of feral animals. The new laws have been designed to make it so difficult that the average Firearm owner gives up and leaves the sport completely. (this is the exact plan of the current state labor government) in WA

Part of the new laws prohibit anyone under the age of 18 from firing a rifle even if they are under the supervision of a Licenced firearm owner. This means a father can no longer legally take his kids out and teach them to shoot.

The effect is the lack of ability for a father to instil in his sons and daughters the love of the outdoors the enjoyment of shooting and hunting and the skills of marksmanship, tracking, stalking and bushcraft.

Young men and women will now have to rely on “Call of duty” or other games on play station/X box to give them the idea that they may like a career in the defence force due to their love of the outdoors.

I proudly served in the ADF both as part of 1RAR and then also 11/28 RWAR over a 10-year period and I owe it all to the interest and love of the outdoors hunting and shooting instilled in me at an early age by my grandfather.

Labor both nationally and state have completely lost their way and are only interested in keeping the Left and woke or green portion of society happy. So, I call on all our members and readers to help by making their vote count when the time presents this year.

send the message through your vote to Labour that enough is enough.

Kind regards

Tim Britten