New York Times

It turns out actions have consequences, and Hamas is finally admitting it. A senior official has expressed regret over the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel—not because of the atrocities committed, but because Gaza has paid the price in return.

Mousa Abu Marzouk, head of Hamas’s foreign relations office, confessed in an interview with The New York Times that he had no knowledge of the attack’s detailed plans. Had he known the scale of the response it would provoke, he says he wouldn’t have supported it.

“If it was expected that what happened would happen, there wouldn’t have been October 7,” he admitted.

In other words, Hamas didn’t expect Israel to strike back as hard as it did. Now, as Gaza lies in ruins, Abu Marzouk and his ilk are trying to backtrack—not out of remorse, but because they realize they’ve lost more than they bargained for.

Abu Marzouk went on to claim that Hamas’s survival is itself a “victory,” but even he had to concede that the destruction inflicted on Gaza makes it impossible to pretend they’ve won.

He also hinted that Hamas may now be open to negotiating disarmament. Funny how that option was never on the table before they got crushed.

Abu Marzouk wants the world to believe Hamas was blindsided by Israel’s response. But let’s not forget—Hamas’s late leader Yahya Sinwar explicitly planned to manipulate Western moral and political dilemmas to turn global opinion against Israel. He knew civilians would suffer and was willing to use their suffering as propaganda.

This interview? Just another attempt at the same game. They knew what was coming. They just didn’t think it would cost them this much.

In response to Abu Marzouk’s statements, Hamas quickly scrambled to cover itself, claiming on its Telegram channel that his remarks were taken “out of context.” The group reiterated that October 7 was an act of “resistance” and that they remain committed to armed struggle.

But the reality is clear: Hamas gambled with the lives of Gazans, expecting the world to shield them from the consequences. They were wrong—and now they’re paying the price.

Ukraine has agreed to a mineral rights deal with the US, set to be finalised on Friday at a White House signing ceremony with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The deal, after intense negotiations, no longer includes a previous US demand for a $500 billion share in potential revenue from Ukraine’s mineral resources.

Trump has framed the agreement as a means for the US to recoup financial aid provided to Ukraine. He has been pushing for a resolution to the war, linking economic cooperation to broader strategic goals. The agreement marks a significant step in defining Ukraine’s future economic ties with the US while balancing security concerns and sovereignty.

The Kremlin has acknowledged the shift in US policy, seeing potential avenues for dialogue but remaining cautious. Key divisions persist, particularly regarding European security structures and broader geopolitical implications. The mineral deal has been a contentious issue, with Zelensky initially refusing to sign the agreement drafted by Trump’s administration, citing concerns over resource control and national security.

European leaders reacted strongly to the initial terms proposed by the US, particularly the claim to substantial future mineral revenues. The revised agreement includes the establishment of a “Reconstruction Investment Fund,” structured to reflect actual financial contributions from participating nations.

Ukrainian media reports indicate that while the US intends to make financial commitments, these do not include concrete security guarantees. Zelensky had resisted signing an earlier version of the deal under Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, insisting on a direct agreement with Trump. His stance was seen as an effort to strengthen Ukraine’s negotiating position and ensure fair terms.

Trump has argued that US companies should gain access to Ukraine’s mineral wealth as compensation for the billions provided in aid. Ukraine, in turn, has sought stronger security commitments, particularly in light of ongoing military threats. The revised deal attempts to balance these interests, though questions remain over its long-term impact.

The US has been Ukraine’s most significant supporter since Russia’s invasion in 2022, providing financial, military, and political backing. As the war enters its third year, Kyiv continues to push for NATO membership and expanded military support, seeing these as critical to securing a lasting peace.

Zelensky has remained firm in his stance that Ukraine’s sovereignty is not for sale. His recent discussions with European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and leaders of Finland and Denmark, underscore ongoing diplomatic efforts to maintain Western support.

While some US officials have criticised Zelensky’s negotiating tactics, others have praised his resilience. Trump’s envoy Keith Kellogg publicly commended Zelensky’s leadership, while some within Trump’s circle have expressed frustration with Kyiv’s stance.

As the deal moves towards finalisation, the broader implications for US-Ukraine relations, European security, and Russia’s response remain uncertain.

From the Army, Navy, and Air Force to cutting-edge tech, AUKUS, and Quad alliances, we uncover how Australia shapes Indo-Pacific security.

Australia is modernizing its military with the AS9 Huntsman self-propelled artillery—based on the K9 Thunder—and it’s set to transform the nation’s firepower. But why did Australia choose this system? In this video, we break down the capabilities, firepower, and strategic importance of the AS9, exploring how it fits into Australia’s defence plans. From precision-guided Excalibur munitions to its enhanced mobility and protection, the AS9 is a major step up from traditional towed artillery. We’ll also discuss how this multi-billion-dollar investment supports Australia’s military industry and strengthens its alliances.

The rising cost of living has forced many Australians to reconsider their retirement plans, with a significant number staying in the workforce longer or returning to work after retiring. What was once considered a well-earned phase of rest and leisure is becoming increasingly out of reach for many.

Recent data reveals that one in six Australians over the age of 43 has delayed retirement or re-entered the workforce in the past two years. Of those affected, half cited the rising cost of living as the primary reason. The dream of a comfortable retirement is slipping away as financial pressures mount.

Separate research has highlighted that those over 50 are also feeling the squeeze, with many delaying retirement or actively seeking ways to cut back on expenses. More than half in this age group believe achieving a comfortable retirement is unattainable. Almost seven in ten individuals aged 50 and above admit that their retirement plans are off-track due to insufficient savings.

For those who have already retired, financial stress continues to grow. More than three-quarters report that their pension payments are barely covering essential living expenses such as groceries and utilities. This has led to a shift in expectations, with many adjusting their retirement outlook to a more modest standard of living.

Debt is another major issue, with nearly one in four retirees using their pension payments to service existing loans. The situation is even worse for those who do not own a home, with 30 per cent allocating pension funds to debt repayments instead of essential expenses.

Challenging economic conditions have prompted a surge in Australians seeking financial guidance. Those who engage with financial advisors report feeling more confident about their retirement plans compared to those who do not seek professional advice.

Beyond the immediate financial concerns, the strain on retirees is having a ripple effect on future generations. Many veterans and retirees who had hoped to support their grandchildren financially are finding it increasingly difficult to do so. Rising costs mean that what was once extra help for education, housing, or everyday needs is now being absorbed by basic living expenses. This shift is placing additional burdens on younger Australians, who may have previously relied on family support to ease their financial struggles.

With retirement increasingly seen as a luxury rather than an expected stage of life, many Australians are left wondering whether the golden years will ever truly arrive. The cost of living crisis is reshaping expectations, forcing both current and future generations to navigate financial challenges that were once unforeseen.

Chinese Intelligence Collection Vessel Haiwangxing operating off Australia. Australian Department of Defence Photo

China’s military activities in the past fortnight have underscored a stark reality—Beijing will continue aggressive manoeuvres in the South China Sea and beyond. Australia must prepare for more frequent and prolonged visits by advanced Chinese warships, along with continued discrepancies between China’s words and actions.

Three key lessons emerge from recent developments.

1. China’s Military Will Keep Targeting Australia

On 11 February, the Department of Defence reported the fifth known incident of unsafe Chinese military behaviour toward the Australian Defence Force. That same day, a powerful Chinese naval task group was detected in Australia’s northeastern maritime approaches. A week later, Defence confirmed the resumption of high-level military talks with China—the first since 2019. However, just days later, on 21 and 22 February, the Chinese task group conducted two live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea, causing commercial aircraft to adjust flight paths with little notice. Foreign Minister Penny Wong raised concerns with her Chinese counterpart at a G20 meeting in South Africa. These events highlight China’s willingness to challenge Australia while engaging in diplomatic discussions.

Expect China’s military to continue testing Australia and other nations that defend freedom of navigation and overflight. A forthcoming ASPI report will track unsafe incidents involving China’s military against Australia, the US, Canada, the Netherlands, the Philippines, and other countries resisting Beijing’s excessive maritime claims.

2. China’s Words and Actions Don’t Align

China’s readout of the 17 February defence talks emphasised “strategic communication” and handling disputes peacefully. Yet, its actions—such as its South China Sea assertiveness and undisclosed military exercises—contradict these claims. While China’s tactics may shift, its broader strategy remains unchanged: expanding influence and testing adversaries.

3. Expect More Chinese Naval Deployments

Since 2022, China has increased naval operations near Australia’s exclusive economic zone. Originally focused on coastal defence, Beijing’s navy has evolved into a global force, deploying task groups to the Gulf of Aden since 2008 for counter-piracy missions. These deployments, lasting about four months, have been constrained by limited support ships and overseas bases. However, that is changing.

The US Department of Defence reported in December 2024 that China plans to build additional fleet replenishment oilers to extend its navy’s operational reach. With 12 oilers already supporting long-distance deployments, Beijing is prioritising logistical expansion. China’s only overseas base, in Djibouti, along with a presence in Cambodia’s Ream naval base, signals efforts to bolster its naval infrastructure.

As China strengthens its global naval reach, Australia’s limited naval capabilities will face growing pressure to monitor increased Chinese activity. Ensuring regional stability and maintaining freedom of navigation will require sustained vigilance and strategic adaptation.

Monday was a historic day for the TPI Federation of Australia and all fellow TPIs.  The TPI Federation President has stepped down from power. (Copy attached).

Posted by Peter Barnes

I have created another video with more Australian Vietnam War photos with more images of tracker dogs. Images in the video are Australians in the Army, Air Force, and Navy, in the Vietnam War. Sadly, I read that Peter Haran recently passed away aged 76. Peter served as a Corporal in the 2nd and 3rd Battalion, The Royal Australian Regiment, and did two tours of Vietnam. He authored the book ‘Trackers’…. The book is a gritty and moving story that reveals the Australian Army’s little-known use of combat tracker dogs during the Vietnam War. From memory, Peter Haran and I crossed paths in the early 2000s at the ABC building in Adelaide, when he was talking about his book and I was asked to talk to Peter Goers on his radio programme about the Australian War Heroes Song I authored. Rest In Peace Peter Haran. I hope I have got this right… in order of arrival in Vietnam, the tracker dogs were Cassius Justin Caesar Marcus Tiber Janus Julian Milo Trajan Juno Marcian Vietnam Veterans’ Day in Australia is on August 18, which is the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan in 1966. It’s a day to honour the service and sacrifice of Australians who fought in the Vietnam War. 521 Australians died during Australia’s involvement in the war, from 1962 to 1973. Around 3,000 Australians were wounded in the Vietnam War. This includes those who were injured, ill, or otherwise wounded during the war. More than 63,000 men were conscripted into the Australian Army during the Vietnam War. Of nearly 16,000 national servicemen who served in the war, over 200 died and at least 1,200 were wounded on active duty. Lest We Forget. The video also features the backing track for the Australian War Heroes Song titled ‘Can You Hear Australia’s Heroes Marching?’, authored by me in 2001. Video titled ‘More Australian Vietnam War Photos’ created by Peter Barnes on the 24th of February, 2025.