Too Little, Too Late: Albanese’s Failure on Antisemitism Exposed

The attempted targeting of Sydney’s Great Synagogue and Jewish Museum has revealed a disturbing truth: Australia’s Jewish community has been under attack for months while the federal government failed to act. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s recent condemnation of antisemitic activity rings hollow after 15 months of inaction, during which violent incidents and hate-fuelled threats have escalated.

The discovery of explosives in a caravan in Dural on January 19, along with information regarding key Jewish sites in Sydney, underscores the severity of the threat. Police now believe this plot is linked to months of orchestrated antisemitic attacks, yet the government has only now found its voice. The Prime Minister’s vow to “hunt down and lock up” perpetrators is too little, too late. Where was this determination a year ago when Jewish schools, synagogues, and businesses first raised the alarm?

Despite growing evidence of coordination among extremist elements, authorities have been slow to respond. Several individuals on the periphery of the Dural caravan plot, including Scott Marshall and Tammie Farrugia, are in custody on unrelated charges, but the masterminds remain at large. Peter Wertheim of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry has warned that until the “puppet masters” are apprehended, the community remains at risk. Rabbi Benjamin Elton of the Great Synagogue has been advised to alter his daily route for safety—a sobering reality for Australian Jews in 2025.

While the government defends its handling of the crisis, the Jewish community and security experts tell a different story. Private security firms have seen a surge in demand for protection at Jewish institutions, filling the void left by an unresponsive government. Meanwhile, ASIO director general Mike Burgess has ruled out raising the terror threat level, despite clear evidence of organised and escalating antisemitic activity.

Even international figures are calling out the government’s failure. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar has condemned the spread of antisemitism in Australia as “almost unchecked,” demanding stronger action. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has also criticised the government’s passive response, rightly pointing out that leadership means proactive prevention, not reactive platitudes.

Prime Minister Albanese had over a year to take meaningful action against the rise in antisemitism. Instead, he waited until a near-tragedy forced his hand. Condemnation after the fact does nothing to restore trust or provide security to a community under siege. The time for decisive leadership was 15 months ago—now, it may be too late.

Australia Extends Collins-Class Submarine Fleet to Strengthen Defence

SeaWatch Blog

Australia is undertaking a major modernisation of its six Collins-class diesel-electric submarines, extending their service life into the 2030s. This $4-$5 billion project aims to maintain a credible undersea deterrent while awaiting the arrival of nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS agreement. The upgrades will enhance Australia’s ability to patrol its vast maritime domain, secure vital trade routes, and counter China’s growing naval presence.

The Australian government is increasingly concerned about rising geopolitical tensions, particularly China’s assertive military expansion. In May 2023, a Chinese J-10 fighter jet fired flares at an Australian naval helicopter enforcing North Korea sanctions over the Yellow Sea. This provocation underscored the importance of a strong defence strategy. Submarines are a key element in this approach, providing a stealthy and effective means of deterrence.

The Collins-class submarines, widely regarded as among the best diesel-electric boats in the world, are undergoing a life-of-type extension (LOTE) at Osborne shipyard in South Australia. This upgrade is critical to ensuring Australia maintains an effective undersea capability until nuclear-powered vessels arrive under AUKUS. The investment highlights the government’s commitment to defence and securing maritime trade routes, which are essential for the nation’s resource-driven economy.

Originally designed in the 1980s to replace the aging Oberon-class, the Collins-class submarines were developed with long-range capabilities to suit Australia’s geographic isolation. First delivered between 1996 and 2003, they became the country’s first indigenously built submarines, drawing inspiration from Sweden’s Type 471 design. Their primary roles include attacking enemy ships, countering hostile submarines, and gathering intelligence.

Each Collins-class submarine measures 255 feet in length, displaces 3,000 tons, and operates with a quiet diesel-electric propulsion system. They require a crew of 42 and are armed with MK 48 heavyweight torpedoes and Harpoon anti-ship missiles. The six boats—HMAS Collins, Farncomb, Waller, Dechaineux, Sheean, and Rankin—form the backbone of Australia’s current submarine force.

As Australia navigates an increasingly volatile security environment, modernising the Collins-class fleet ensures continued operational capability. These submarines will serve as a critical stopgap until nuclear-powered vessels are commissioned. The government’s proactive approach reflects its awareness that regional tensions are escalating, making a strong naval force essential for national security and economic stability.

The Collins-class upgrades will also sustain Australia’s defence industry, preserving technical expertise and jobs. With the AUKUS agreement set to deliver nuclear-powered submarines in the coming years, maintaining a robust submarine force in the interim is vital. Australia’s maritime security strategy underscores the necessity of deterrence, ensuring the nation is prepared for future challenges in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific region.

 

 

Here is this week’s Smile

Ethel had checked into a motel on her 65th birthday. She was lonely and a little depressed at her advancing age, so decided to risk an adventure. She thought, “I’ll call one of those men you see advertised in phone books for escorts and sensual massages.”

She looked through the phone book, found a full-page ad for a guy calling himself Tender Tony, a very handsome man with assorted physical skills flexing in the photo. He had all the right muscles in all the right places, thick wavy hair, long powerful legs, dazzling smile, six pack abs and she felt quite certain she could bounce a dime off his well-oiled buns …….

She figured, what the heck, nobody will ever know. I’ll give him a call.

“Good evening, ma’am, how may I help you?”

Oh my, he sounded soooo sexy!

Afraid she would lose her nerve if she hesitated, she rushed right in, “I hear you give a great massage. I’d like you to come to my motel room and give me one. No, wait, I should be straight with you. I’m in town all alone and what I really want is sex. I want it hot, and I want it now. Bring implements, toys, everything you’ve got in your bag of tricks. We’ll go at it all night – tie me up, cover me in chocolate syrup and whipped cream, anything and everything, I’m ready! Now how does that sound?”

He said, “That sounds absolutely fantastic, but you need to press 9 for an outside line.”

Have your say: Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy

 Have your say: Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy

28 January 2025

Whether you have or know someone who has served in the Australian Defence Force (ADF), all Australians are encouraged to have their say on the Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy Exposure Draft. The veteran community were consulted in late 2023, and now the Australian public are invited to share their thoughts.

Any and all Australians can participate, including veterans, current serving ADF members, and families plus organisations that have an interest or role in supporting the Defence and veteran community.

Feedback will help inform what is important when it comes to supporting the mental health and wellbeing of our Defence and veteran community.

The Exposure Draft is available to download here.

Feedback may be provided by:

·         answering specific questions in the exposure draft survey 

·         entering or uploading a written submission in the submission portal.

Your feedback will inform the finalisation of the Strategy. Consultation on the Exposure Draft is now open and will close at 5:00 pm Friday 7 March 2025.

The Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy is jointly developed by DVA and Defence to guide how the government provides support to current and former serving ADF members. The strategy is set to be finalised later this year.

For more information visit the Defence and Veteran Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy webpage.

Information and conversations about mental health and suicide might be distressing to some people.

In the case of an emergency call 000.

If you need support:

·         Open Arms – Veterans and Families Counselling provides free and confidential counselling to anyone who has served at least one day in the ADF and their families via a 24-hours helpline 1800 011 046

·         All-hours Support Line, a confidential telephone service for ADF members and their families is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week 1800 628 036

·         Defence Member and Family Support Helpline 1800 624 608

·         13YARN  (national crisis support line for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people) 13 92 76

·         Griefline (support for experiencing loss and grief) 1300 845 745

·         QLife (LGBTI peer support and referral for people wanting to talk about sexuality, identity, gender, bodies, feelings or relationships) 1800 184 527

·         Lifeline Australia (crisis support) 13 11 14

·         Suicide Call Back 1300 659 467

·         Kids Help Line (phone counselling service) 1800 551 800

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER

ED: From my inbox by John Clarkson.

Tuesday 28th January 2025.

To:     The Prime Minister of Australia – Hon. Mr Anthony Albanese, MP;

Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet;

The Leader of the Opposition – Hon. Mr Peter Dutton, MP;

Liberal Party Headquarters – Canberra.

For Information:

The Federal Member for Longman – Hon. Mr Terry Young, MP.

 

Rise of Antisemitism in Australia.

Gentlemen,

         It is no secret that I have written several letters regarding the very real problems concerning Israel and the terrorist group ‘HAMAS’, and the embarrassing lack of real action by our Australian Government.  The very first letter I wrote on this matter was in mid October 2023, seeking the type of action our nation intended to take to support our ally.

         Sadly, in the many months since, we as a nation, have done very little to support our important ally.  The very fact that Australia regards Israel as an ally is a very important bi-partisan fact.  One of the strongest supporters of Israel in the last 50 years has been the courageous Mr Bob Hawke.

         However, since the recent 80th anniversary of the Holocaust, held at the infamous Auschwitz camp, the rise of antisemitism in our country has risen to an unacceptable level.  So, what can be done?  Before I describe ‘what should have been done?’ I must emphasise right now that any future statements and/or action MUST have a bi-partisan backing.  From now on, irrespective of party politics, or irrespective of any prospective election coming in the wings, ALL actions, ALL statements MUST have a bi-partisan backing.  I look forward to our Prime Minister commanding an urgent meeting with his inner cabinet and creating a plan to defeat the antisemitism in this country.  Once their plan is created, I would hope that our Prime Minister would then make a public statement and actually give the necessary COMMAND for the removal of antisemitism.  Yes, it will take incredible bravery for any national leader to actually head off the rise of this nasty antisemitism.

         Now, I wish to describe the actions which our national Parliament SHOULD have taken on Monday 9th October 2023.  That Monday was the first sitting day of parliament following the terrorist attack by the Hamas group on Israel soil.  If I remember correctly, the Prime Minister gave one very short comment on the fact that this event actually happened.  Such inaction by a strong ally of Israel is grossly unforgiveable!

         So, what should have happened?  When the Prime Minister announced in parliament a short description of the event and then sat down, the Leader of the Opposition should have been on his feet in 5 milliseconds and asked the entire Parliament to debate the steps and action our nation should take in defence of our ally, Israel.  He also should have stated his bipartisan support of any Government action recommended to defend Israel against its enemies.  Sadly, this did not happen.  Yes, if Australia and other allies of Israel had have acted in support of Israel in the first week or two following the terrorist attack, it is highly likely that this ‘war’ we now have would have lasted less than a month.

         However, now that we have gone over 15 months since the terrorist attack, such thoughts on “What should have been done” are now useless.  We, as a nation, need to focus on what actions we can take, in liaison with any other ally of Israel, to help in the defeat of the terrorist group, Hamas.  As we were once a strong ally of Israel, they must look on Australia with a very disappointed look.  Yes, they have been let down.

         Now is not the time to make comforting comments to our people saying how disappointed our leaders are with the current state of affairs.  Now is the time to coordinate an action plan, with bipartisan support, for our nation to pull together and defeat this enemy.  We as a nation, have done this before, albeit a generation ago, but when we pull together, we can do it.

         Therefore, stop making nice comments to the press, get together and start making plans.  Our nation needs action and that has to be a bipartisan action.  So, put all your petty party politics behind you and start defending your nation.

 Yours Sincerely

 John Clarkson.

 (Sergeant – RAAF – Retired).

  (Veteran of Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam Campaigns).

 

 

Did You Know?

Stars & Stripes

Did you know the M16 rifle, a staple of modern military arsenals, was designed by Eugene Stoner, an innovative American engineer, in the late 1950s? Stoner was working for the Armalite Corporation when he developed the rifle’s original design, which was first introduced as the Armalite AR-15. This lightweight, gas-operated, magazine-fed weapon stood out due to its use of advanced materials like aluminium and composite plastics, which made it lighter and easier to handle compared to earlier rifles.

In the early 1960s, the U.S. military adopted the AR-15 design and designated it the M16. This transition occurred during the Vietnam War, as the M16 replaced the heavier and less versatile M14 rifle. The M16’s design prioritized portability and a high rate of fire, making it well-suited for the challenging conditions of jungle warfare.

Since its initial adoption, the M16 has undergone numerous upgrades and modifications to improve reliability, accuracy, and adaptability. Variants of the rifle, such as the M16A1, M16A2, and the M4 carbine (a shorter, more compact version), have been widely used by U.S. forces and allied militaries worldwide. Today, while newer models like the M4 are more commonly deployed, the M16 remains a symbol of innovation in firearm design and an enduring piece of military history.

A Boost for Marginal Electorates: Dutton’s Housing Plan to Aid Australians

ED: This from my inbox. I was not expecting to be able to post today but my admission time was pushed back from 8:00am to 1:00pm.

The Coalition’s plan to address the housing crisis by prioritising local homebuyers over foreign investors is a bold move that resonates with a vast majority of Australians. According to the latest Resolve Political Monitor survey, 69 per cent of voters support the initiative, with 73 per cent in marginal electorates expressing strong approval. This bipartisan endorsement, including 60 per cent of Labor voters, highlights the widespread demand for action on housing affordability.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton’s proposal includes a two-year ban on foreign investors and temporary residents purchasing existing homes. This approach aims to level the playing field for local bidders struggling to secure housing amid skyrocketing prices. While the policy permits foreign investment in new developments to stimulate construction, its emphasis on protecting existing housing stock for Australians could prove pivotal in the upcoming election.

Marginal electorates—often decisive in determining government—stand to benefit significantly. The higher level of support in these areas reflects the acute pressures faced by local communities. Housing affordability remains a critical issue, and this plan’s potential to shift market dynamics could attract voters seeking tangible solutions.

In addition to the housing ban, Dutton has pledged to reduce the annual permanent migration intake from 185,000 to 140,000 for the next two years and tighten restrictions on international student numbers. These measures aim to alleviate demand pressures on housing and infrastructure, offering a comprehensive response to the crisis.

While the Albanese government has criticised the policy as insufficient, citing existing restrictions and fees on foreign buyers, the Coalition’s plan addresses a key public concern. Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ comments that foreign purchases are already limited overlook the symbolic and practical impact of further tightening these measures. The Coalition’s focus on Australian homeownership as a priority signals a commitment to ensuring fair access to housing.

A review of the policy after two years will be crucial to assessing its impact. Regular evaluations will provide the necessary data to fine-tune the approach and address any unintended consequences. Housing affordability is a complex issue, but decisive steps like this—grounded in public support—are essential for progress.

As Australia’s housing market continues to dominate the political agenda, the Coalition’s plan offers a clear stance on prioritising local buyers. By addressing concerns in marginal electorates and committing to regular reviews, this policy has the potential to become a cornerstone of effective housing reform. The widespread support it enjoys across the political divide is a testament to its relevance and urgency.

F-15EX: The U.S. Air Force Now Has a Real ‘Missile Truck’

From 19FortyFive.com: F-15EX Proving Its Mettle with More Missiles – You want to talk about the biggest load of missiles for an American fighter? Let’s discuss the F-15EX Eagle II because it is becoming quite the missile truck. There are two more weapons stations on the Boeing fighter that were tested with two successful missile launches in late November above the Gulf of Mexico.

  • Comparing the Missile Load to Other Fighters –

The F-15EX fired air-to-air missiles in a manner that was deemed satisfactory by the Air Force. This evaluation was noteworthy because now the F-15EX can carry a load of 12 missiles. Other F-15 variants can only deploy eight of the munitions. F-16s have a six air-to-air missile load. Then the F-22 has a capacity for eight missiles, and these are a combination of Sidewinders and AMRAAMs. F-35s have a load of six – four internal and two external. Lockheed Martin plans to increase the missile load with a new F-35 variant. The extra weapons stations will be affixed to the tips of the wings on the F-15EX. This worked well for the 96th Test Wing that ran the evaluation for the firing. One F-15EX launched an AMRAAM and another fired a Sidewinder during the November test. It happened over the Eglin Test and Training Complex’s water range.