China’s New H-20 Stealth Bomber is Worse Than You Think

Picture: H-20 Stealth Bomber. Image Credit: Artist Rendering Chinese Internet.

China’s People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) is developing the H-20 stealth bomber to bolster its nuclear triad and project power across the Indo-Pacific. Resembling the U.S. B-2 Spirit, the H-20 reportedly has a range of 8,000 miles and a 40-ton payload, capable of striking key U.S. and allied targets, including Taiwan and Guam.

This flying-wing bomber may carry nuclear weapons, cruise missiles, and anti-ship ordnance, posing a serious challenge to U.S. air defences. As China edges closer to operational readiness, the H-20 symbolizes its ambition to rival U.S. air power.

Critics point out China’s tendency to “borrow” foreign designs, with the H-20 mirroring America’s B-2 and the upcoming B-21 Raider. While the PLAAF boasts its stealth capabilities, significant details remain unknown, keeping global military analysts on alert.

Why New Chinese AIRCRAFT CARRIER is A Complete DISASTER

China’s newest

Why New Chinese AIRCRAFT CARRIER is A Complete DISASTER

, is often hyped as a rival to the USS Gerald R. Ford. But despite its massive size and advanced design, the reality is far less impressive. Critical flaws undermine its potential, making it a disappointment compared to its U.S. counterpart. In this video, we’ll break down the key reasons why the Fujian falls short, despite China’s ambitions to challenge American naval supremacy. From design issues to operational shortcomings, let’s explore why the Fujian might be one of China’s biggest naval disaster yet!

Ukraine said one of its F-16 pilots achieved a feat nobody flying the jet has managed before

Business Insider – Thibault Spirlet and Sinéad Baker 

 

Photo: Ukraine said one of its F-16 pilots took out six Russian cruise missiles in one flight in December. Facebook/@Air Force Command of UA Armed Forces

Ukraine said one of its F-16 pilots achieved a feat nobody flying the jet had managed before.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, Ukraine’s air force command said a pilot flying an F-16 took out six Russian cruise missiles during a single flight, using air-to-air missiles and an aircraft cannon.

This occurred during a “mass” missile and drone attack in December, it said.

On December 13, Russia fired almost 200 drones, Kinzhal air-launched ballistic missiles, and 94 cruise missiles at Ukraine.

The pilot’s main target was the cruise missiles, the post said.

He used all four air-to-air missiles on board the F-16, two of which were short range, which forced the jet to fly closer to the missiles — an “extremely dangerous” task, it said.

The pilot then struck two other missiles flying close to each other using an air cannon, it added.

Business Insider was not able to verify the report, but air warfare experts described the scenario as plausible, as well as deeply impressive.

Tim Robinson, a military aviation specialist at the UK’s Royal Aeronautical Society, described it as something that could definitely have happened with a pilot in the right place and the right time, and with the right training and enough missiles.

“It still is an incredible achievement because a cruise missile is a quite small target, and it’s also flying quite low,” he said.

The alleged takedowns show “that this pilot has mastered the F16 weapons systems,” Mark Cancian, a senior adviser on the International Security Program at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, added.

Since the start of its full-scale invasion in 2022, Russia has frequently launched large missile attacks at Ukraine, aimed at overwhelming Ukraine’s air defence systems and hitting targets behind the front lines.

Col. Yuriy Ihnat, the head of the Ukrainian air force command’s public relations service, said that intercepting “such important targets is not an easy task for a pilot, but who, if not Ukrainian pilots, has the most experience in the world of winged missiles?”

The pilot, who had recently undergone retraining for F-16s in the US, said in the Facebook post that Ukrainian F-16 pilots had never used an aviation cannon to shoot down targets.

However, he said he applied the lessons he learned in the US.

“I must have set a record that day,” he said, adding: “I am convinced that this experience will be useful to colleagues.”

Ihnat described it as the first documented case.

“Based on objective control, we have one hundred percent confirmation that for the first time in history in anti-air combat, an American fighter F-16 shoots down six winged missiles,” he said.

Air warfare experts also said they believed six missiles in a single mission would be a record for the F-16.

“Shooting down six cruise missiles in a single sortie is at the physical limits of the aircraft, so this would be a record if true,” Cancian said.

He added it was something that was possible because there are so many missiles in the skies over Ukraine.

“An experienced Western pilot would be expected to do this, but none have demonstrated the ability since none have faced the numbers of simultaneous incoming missiles that the Ukrainians have,” he said. “US and Western pilots have faced one or two incoming missiles at a time.”

Cancian also said it shows what Ukraine could do if it was given more of the jets. “More F-16s would mean a more robust air defence for Ukraine.”

 

Is the US Funding the Taliban?

A recent claim by Republican Representative Tim Burchett has reignited concerns over whether U.S. aid is indirectly benefiting the Taliban. This comes amid growing frustration among Americans about foreign aid priorities.

Burchett raised the issue on social media, responding to Elon Musk with a call to cut off funds allegedly reaching the Taliban. He referenced an open letter to Donald Trump, urging action to stop the flow of U.S. taxpayer dollars to the group.

The U.S. remains the largest humanitarian donor in Afghanistan, providing nearly $2 billion in assistance since August 2021. However, USAID has repeatedly stated that it does not provide funds directly to the Taliban. Still, concerns persist over whether aid indirectly benefits the militant group, given their control of the country.

The Taliban is officially classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government. Despite this, they reclaimed power in Afghanistan following the U.S. withdrawal in 2021. Questions about aid reaching the Taliban highlight the complexities of humanitarian assistance in conflict zones.

A report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) in May 2024 revealed that $10.9 million in U.S. aid ended up in Taliban hands. The funds, originally intended for salary withholdings under a system set up by the previous Afghan government, were essential for maintaining humanitarian operations.

A Taliban supporter, @haidarhashmi0, briefly posted a provocative 9/11 image on social media in response to the funding claims. Though deleted quickly, the post was widely circulated, fuelling public backlash.

In December 2023, Burchett introduced the No Tax Dollars for the Taliban Act to block U.S. funds from reaching the group. However, the bill stalled in a Democrat-controlled Senate. With a Republican majority now in Congress, Burchett is optimistic about reviving the legislation.

While the U.S. government maintains that its aid targets humanitarian needs, the ongoing debate highlights the challenges of ensuring funds do not inadvertently empower adversaries.

 

Australia United Under One Flag: Embracing Our National Identity

eWISE Blog 

In a country as diverse and vibrant as Australia, unity is paramount. A symbol of that unity, the Australian flag represents our shared history, values, and aspirations. As Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and Shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price have recently emphasized, the vast majority of Australians want to unite under one flag. This sentiment reflects a desire for national cohesion, respect for our history, and confidence in our future as one people.

Peter Dutton’s commitment to addressing the nation with only the Australian flag behind him, if elected Prime Minister, is a powerful statement of unity. It acknowledges that while we honour and respect the Indigenous flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag, our national flag should remain the singular emblem that binds us all. As a nation, we are stronger together when we rally under one banner, embracing our shared identity rather than highlighting divisions.

Historically, Australians have come together under the Australian flag in moments of celebration, mourning, and national pride. From sporting triumphs to solemn commemorations like Anzac Day, the flag has been a unifying symbol for people of all backgrounds, including Indigenous Australians. It represents the sacrifices made by those who fought for our freedoms, many of whom did so as a united force under the one national flag.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price articulated this well when she stated that Australians want a “united” country represented by “one flag.” The call for a single national flag is not about disregarding the significance of other flags, but rather about fostering a sense of belonging and shared purpose. When we gather under one flag, we affirm our commitment to a cohesive future, recognizing the contributions of all Australians while reinforcing our common identity.

While respect for cultural symbols is essential, there is a growing sentiment that the national stage should be reserved for the Australian flag alone. This is not a denial of the rich tapestry of cultures within our country, but rather an acknowledgment of our need to come together under one unifying symbol. The display of multiple flags in official settings can inadvertently create divisions, suggesting a fragmented national identity. In contrast, one flag embodies the unity we strive for as a nation.

Mr. Dutton’s stance on the one-flag protocol resonates with Australians who are increasingly frustrated with what they perceive as political correctness overshadowing national pride. His previous call for a boycott of Woolworths when they stopped stocking the Australian flag for Australia Day underscores his commitment to promoting national symbols. Australians are right to expect their leaders to stand firm in representing their values and beliefs.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s reluctance to take a definitive stance on this issue further highlights the need for strong leadership that prioritises unity. Australians deserve a leader who confidently stands up for our national identity and values. When the nation gathers on Australia Day, we should do so under one flag, celebrating our shared history and achievements.

We must also acknowledge the significant role of Indigenous Australians in our nation’s story. The contributions and cultures of First Nations people are integral to Australia’s identity. However, unity does not mean erasing differences; it means celebrating them within the framework of a shared national symbol. By coming together under one flag, we honour the past while building a future where all Australians feel included and valued.

Countries like Bolivia and Uruguay have unique historical reasons for recognizing multiple flags, but their experiences should not dictate Australia’s approach. Our history and cultural landscape are distinct. We should focus on what brings us together rather than what sets us apart. By promoting a single national flag, we foster a sense of belonging that transcends cultural and historical divides.

Peter Dutton’s vision for an Australia united under one flag aligns with the sentiments of everyday Australians who want to feel comfortable and relaxed about their history, present, and future. Our flag is more than a piece of fabric; it is a symbol of who we are as a people. It represents our resilience, our achievements, and our collective dreams.

Respecting and acknowledging our Indigenous heritage is crucial, but it should not come at the expense of national unity. The Australian flag, as our official national emblem, should take precedence in all official settings, serving as a reminder of our shared journey and aspirations.

In closing, a united Australia under one flag is not a rejection of our diversity but a celebration of it. It signifies that regardless of our backgrounds, we are one people with a common destiny. Let us move forward with confidence, pride, and unity, embracing our history, living in the present, and looking toward a shared future…all under the one Australian flag.

 

FREE PUBLIC LECTURE – BUILDING AUSTRALIA’S DEFENCE

Dear Ray,

I am organising a Free Lecture event by DAVID ARCHIBALD titled BUILDING AUSTRALIA’S DEFENCE

The flyer with all the required information printed in it is attached along with some studies and writings on WA pathetically small number of Soldiers we have in this vast state of WA.

So, if it is possible I would like to ask if it all or some (at the least the FYER) be put in the next couple of copies of your FRONTLINE.

I will make a donation to your enterprise commensurate to that which you consider is appropriate.

Thank you, Ray, and trust you had a good Christmas and new year.

Cheers

Peter Billington

0419 700 405

CLICK LINKS BELOW

ARMY – Analysis of Soldier NUMBERS in WA – 7th Nov. 2021 (Final)

David Archibald – Building Australias Defence lecture (draf flyer for Saturday 25th January 2025) David Archibald – Building Australias Defence lecture (draf flyer for Saturday 25th January 2025)

Combined Book A4 – NCC NW – ARMY IN WA