I have been advised of Ralph passing from his brother Stuart. Please see his Funeral details below.
Ralph died at home peacefully on the 13th of December 2024
His funeral will be held on Friday 10th January 2025 at 11.00 AM
Mt Thompson Crematorium, East Chapel
329 Nursery Rd, Holland Park Qld
Thank you,
Stuart Bodsworth (brother)
0414 856 651
MAY HE REST IN PEACE
Wendy M McLean
Secretary
4RAR Association Qld. Inc.
The M2 Bradley Replacement is Ready for Battle
Since the 1980s, the M2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV) has served as a mobile fortress for U.S. troops, providing essential support in combat zones across the globe. Designed to transport infantry while offering protection and firepower, the Bradley saw extensive action in conflicts such as Desert Storm, Iraq, and Afghanistan. It became a symbol of U.S. military strength and adaptability, but as warfare evolves, so too must the tools of battle.
In recent years, the limitations of the Bradley have become apparent. The vehicle’s armour, while robust, is increasingly vulnerable to modern anti-tank weapons. Its firepower, once formidable, now struggles to keep pace with advancements in enemy technology. Additionally, the Bradley’s aging design makes it less effective in the digital age of warfare, where speed, communication, and situational awareness are paramount.
Recognizing these shortcomings, the U.S. Army has launched a quest to find a suitable replacement. This new vehicle must not only surpass the Bradley in terms of firepower and protection but also incorporate cutting-edge technology to enhance battlefield performance. Autonomous systems, advanced sensors, and integrated AI are among the features being considered to ensure the next-generation IFV is future-proof.
The goal is clear: to create a combat vehicle capable of surviving and thriving in the unpredictable and ever-changing landscape of modern warfare. By prioritizing adaptability, the U.S. Army aims to maintain its tactical edge, ensuring that soldiers remain protected and lethal in the face of emerging threats. The future of infantry combat is on the horizon.
ED: An article from my inbox from US member – Thanks Dave Coates
Stars & Stripes
Australia’s military involvement in the Vietnam War marked a significant chapter in the nation’s history. Around 60,000 Australian military personnel served in Vietnam during the course of the war, with a maximum of 7,700 combat troops deployed at any one time. The war had a profound impact on Australian society, politics, and its international relationships, particularly with the United States.
Prior to World War II, Australia’s foreign policy was closely aligned with Britain. However, during and after the war, Australia began to seek stronger defence ties with the United States. This shift was driven by growing concerns over security in the Asia-Pacific region and the perceived threat of communist expansion. By the 1950s, Australia had established closer ties with the US through agreements such as the ANZUS Treaty (1951), which formalized a security pact between Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Additionally, Australia joined the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) and provided financial aid and support to South Vietnam as part of its commitment to containing communism.
Australia’s involvement in Vietnam began in 1962, when the Menzies government sent a contingent of military trainers to assist the South Vietnamese army. By 1964, the government introduced conscription to increase the size of its defence force, a decision that proved controversial within Australian society. The first Australian combat troops were deployed to Vietnam in 1965, marking the start of Australia’s direct military engagement in the conflict.
In 1966, Australian forces were given responsibility for Phuoc Tuy province, located about 50 miles east of Saigon. They established a major base and airstrip at Nui Dat and worked to secure the surrounding area from Viet Cong forces. Unlike their American counterparts, Australian military tactics were more cautious and measured. They operated in smaller units, typically platoons, and employed counter-insurgency tactics that focused on gaining the support of the local population while avoiding major roads, paths, and obvious ambush points. This approach made Australian troops more effective and respected by the enemy, though some American commanders criticized the Australians for not clearing areas as quickly as desired.
One of the most notable engagements involving Australian forces was the Battle of Long Tan in August 1966. A force of 108 Australian soldiers from Delta Company, 6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (6RAR), successfully defended their position against a much larger Viet Cong force, demonstrating the effectiveness of their tactics.
The Vietnam War took a heavy toll on Australian forces. A total of 521 Australian servicemen were killed in action, and more than 3,000 were wounded. Many veterans suffered long-term physical and psychological effects from their service, leading to ongoing debates about the war’s impact on individuals and the nation.
The Vietnam War coincided with a period of significant social and political change in Australia. The Cold War era was marked by fears of communist infiltration in unions, political parties, and society at large. These fears influenced government policy and public sentiment. However, as the war dragged on, public opposition to Australia’s involvement grew. Anti-war protests became more frequent and widespread, particularly among students, unions, and religious groups.
Conscription was one of the most contentious issues of the time. The introduction of compulsory military service led to significant public outcry, with many Australians viewing it as an unjust policy. The anti-conscription movement gained momentum throughout the late 1960s and early 1970s, further fuelling opposition to the war.
Australia began withdrawing its troops from Vietnam in 1971. The Australian government, under Prime Minister John Gorton, initiated the withdrawal process in 1970, reflecting growing public discontent and changing political priorities. By late 1972, most Australian combat troops had been withdrawn, with the remaining personnel primarily involved in support and advisory roles. The final phase of the withdrawal was completed by December 1972, when the Australian government officially declared the end of its combat role in Vietnam.
The complete withdrawal of Australian forces was finalized by 30 June 1973, marking the end of the nation’s military involvement in Vietnam. The war had a lasting impact on Australia’s foreign policy and military strategy, with subsequent governments adopting a more cautious approach to overseas military engagements.
The legacy of the Vietnam War remains a subject of reflection and debate in Australia. Many veterans struggled to reintegrate into society upon their return, facing indifference or hostility from a public divided over the war’s justification. It was not until the 1980s that the contributions of Vietnam veterans were formally recognized, culminating in the establishment of the Australian Vietnam Forces National Memorial in Canberra in 1992.
The Vietnam War also reshaped Australia’s defence policies and its relationship with the United States. The conflict underscored the importance of regional security and the need for Australia to maintain a capable and independent defence force. It also highlighted the challenges and consequences of military intervention in foreign conflicts, lessons that continue to influence Australian defence strategy today.
Photo: Navy pilot graduate Acting Sub Lieutenant Natika Dunn is awarded with ‘wings’ by Commander Fleet Air Arm Commodore Matthew Royals at 278 ADF Intermediate Pilots Course Graduation at 1 Flying Training School, RAAF Base East Sale. Photo: Flight Lieutenant Daina Sawade.
Acting Sub-Lieutenant Natika Dunn has made history as the first Navy trainee to graduate with wings from 1 Flying Training School at RAAF Base East Sale.
“It’s amazing to be the first Navy graduate here on the east coast,” Acting Sub-Lieutenant Dunn said.
“Being able to complete all my training on the east coast provided a quicker training pipeline, giving us continuous training throughout and support from the same instructors the whole way through.
“I am incredibly happy, it’s been a big year and a half to get here.”
The joint graduation of Navy and Air Force pilots from Course 278 ADF Intermediate Pilots Course marked a significant milestone in the progression of paralleled pilot training schools in Victoria and Western Australia.
Increased flying training capability will enable more ADF pilots to graduate across Australia this year.
Commander Fleet Air Arm Commodore Matthew Royals returned to RAAF Base East Sale to address the graduates as the Reviewing Officer.
Having spent three years of his career instructing students as the Senior Naval Officer at the School of Air Warfare in Sale, Commodore Royals was proud to return and oversee the historic graduation.
“This is not just another graduation, it is a monumental moment in our Defence Force’s history,” Commodore Royals said.
“For the first time, a Royal Australian Navy pilot has completed their entire Intermediate Flying Training here at 1 Flying Training School (FTS), something that has been traditionally shared by 1FTS and 2FTS at RAAF Base Pearce in WA.
“This significant shift underscores the growing integration between our services and demonstrates our collective commitment to a truly unified Defence Force.”
Since 1913, Australian military aviators have proudly worn the Wings badge, awarded to aircrew who have achieved the required proficiency in flying a military aircraft.
More than 100 years later, earning a pilot’s wings remains a significant accomplishment.
The Independent
The shift to green energy has seen an exponential rise in the number of wind farms. Wind turbines now dot our landscapes, heralding the promise of a sustainable future. Yet, as compelling as this clean energy source is, it carries with it significant environmental challenges that are often overlooked.
Loss of Wildlife and Koala Habitat
One of the most pressing concerns associated with wind farms is the impact on wildlife. The construction of wind turbines often requires clearing vast areas of land, which leads to the destruction of natural habitats. In Australia, this has resulted in the loss of critical koala habitats. These iconic creatures, already under threat due to deforestation and urban development, now face an additional challenge from wind farm expansions. Disrupting their natural environment has a cascading effect on biodiversity, leading to a decline in various species that depend on these ecosystems.
Bird and Bat Mortality
Wind turbines are notorious for causing bird and bat mortality. The rotating blades, while a marvel of engineering, are a significant threat to avian life. Birds, particularly raptors and migratory species, often fall victim to these spinning giants. The disruption to bat populations is equally concerning, as they play a vital role in controlling insect populations and pollinating plants. The ecological imbalance caused by these fatalities can have long-term repercussions on local ecosystems.
Devastation of the Horizon
The visual impact of wind farms on the horizon is another contentious issue. In rural and coastal areas, where natural landscapes are cherished, the sight of towering wind turbines can be jarring. For many, these structures disrupt the natural beauty of the land and diminish the cultural and aesthetic value of the countryside. This visual pollution can also impact tourism, as visitors may be deterred by the industrial appearance of once-pristine landscapes.
Cost of Construction and Maintenance
The financial cost of constructing and maintaining wind turbines is substantial. Each turbine requires extensive groundwork, including the use of heavy machinery and large-scale construction operations. The ongoing maintenance, particularly in remote areas, adds to the overall cost. While proponents argue that wind energy is cost-effective in the long run, the initial investment and upkeep are significant financial burdens that cannot be ignored.
The Volume of Oil and Concrete Required
Despite being marketed as a green energy solution, wind turbines require large quantities of non-renewable resources during their construction. Each turbine contains several tonnes of steel, copper, and rare earth elements. Additionally, the volume of oil required for lubrication is significant. A typical wind turbine requires hundreds of gallons of oil annually to keep its components running smoothly. Furthermore, each turbine base is anchored by massive concrete foundations, often requiring over 1,000 tonnes of concrete per unit. The environmental footprint of producing and transporting these materials is considerable and contradicts the green narrative.
Reliance on Wind to Generate Power
The effectiveness of wind turbines is inherently tied to the availability of wind. While some regions experience consistent wind patterns, others do not, leading to intermittent energy generation. This reliance on weather conditions makes wind energy less reliable compared to traditional energy sources. To compensate for periods of low wind, backup energy solutions, often fossil-fuel-based, are required to maintain a steady power supply. This dependency undermines the goal of reducing carbon emissions and highlights the limitations of wind energy as a standalone solution.
Conclusion
While wind energy presents an opportunity to move away from fossil fuels, it is essential to acknowledge its environmental and economic drawbacks. The loss of wildlife habitats, bird mortality, visual impact, high construction costs, and reliance on non-renewable resources challenge the perception of wind turbines as a wholly green solution. As we transition towards a more sustainable future, it is crucial to balance renewable energy initiatives with the protection of our natural environment. A comprehensive approach that includes careful site selection, wildlife protection measures, and diversified energy sources will be necessary to achieve truly sustainable energy solutions.
Ukraine has launched a renewed cross-border offensive in Russia’s Kursk region, aiming to bolster its territorial gains ahead of potential peace negotiations. This escalation comes as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump reiterates his intention to end the conflict swiftly once he takes office.
Reports of the offensive began circulating over the weekend, with unverified footage shared by Russian military bloggers showing a convoy of Ukrainian tanks and armoured vehicles advancing toward the village of Berdin. This village lies just beyond the territory currently controlled by Ukraine in the Kursk region.
Kyiv has not officially confirmed the new operation. However, Andriy Yermak, head of the Ukrainian presidential office, hinted at progress, stating, “Kursk region, good news. Russia is getting what it deserves.” Meanwhile, Andrii Kovalenko, head of Ukraine’s Centre for Countering Disinformation, confirmed that Ukrainian forces had launched coordinated attacks on multiple fronts within Kursk.
Russian military bloggers, often privy to frontline realities, acknowledged the Ukrainian offensive with concern. Yuri Podolyaka, a prominent blogger, wrote on Telegram, “The morning in the Kursk region starts worryingly again. Yesterday’s failure won’t deter the enemy from trying again today.”
The U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) confirmed that Ukrainian forces had advanced into the southern outskirts of Berdin. The village lies northeast of Sudzha, the largest area captured by Ukraine during its initial incursion five months ago. The ISW reported that Ukraine’s forces were attacking in at least three areas: toward Berdin, toward Pushkarnoye to the east, and around Korenevo to the west.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in his nightly address on Saturday, highlighted the heavy casualties inflicted on Russian and North Korean forces near the village of Makhnovka, southeast of Sudzha. Citing General Oleksandr Syrskyi, he stated that hundreds of Russian and allied troops had been killed in the battle.
Other reports from Russian military sources indicated that Ukraine’s offensive involved hundreds of troops in a heavily mechanized assault. Analysts suggest that Kyiv’s actions could be aimed at diverting Russian forces from their gradual advance in eastern Ukraine, particularly in Donetsk. On Monday, Russia’s defence ministry announced its capture of Kurakhove in Donetsk after prolonged fighting.
Ukraine’s ability to maintain control over parts of Kursk is seen as a strategic advantage in upcoming peace talks. Russia still holds about 20% of Ukrainian territory after nearly three years of conflict. Securing a foothold in Russian territory strengthens Kyiv’s negotiating position as both sides prepare for diplomacy.
Both nations are racing to secure battlefield advantages before Trump’s inauguration on January 20. The incoming U.S. president has repeatedly pledged to end the war within 24 hours of taking office, though he has yet to outline his specific plan.
Since Ukraine’s daring cross-border assault on August 6 last year, Russian forces, aided by approximately 11,000 North Korean troops, have steadily pushed back Kyiv’s gains in Kursk. However, recent Ukrainian advancements suggest a renewed effort to solidify control over the contested region.
During a visit to South Korea over the weekend, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasized the strategic importance of Ukraine’s hold on parts of Kursk. “The positions of Ukraine’s armed forces in the Kursk region are crucial for any future negotiations,” Blinken stated, underscoring the significance of Kyiv’s territorial gains ahead of diplomatic discussions.
As the conflict intensifies, both Ukraine and Russia appear focused on shaping the battlefield in their favour, setting the stage for high-stakes negotiations in the coming months.
Bill Hall served in 7PL C COY 1RAR in Vietnam and was awarded a Commendation for Gallantry, he was a very popular member of the company and will be greatly missed.
Late of Granadilla Drive, Earlville FNQLD, aged 80 years. Most dearly loved husband of Kath, loved father and father-in-law of Michael, Trevor, Darren and Devon, loved grandfather of Nirvana, Tina, Tyler, Jack and Layla, loved brother of Robyn, Brian and Joan (dec’d), Loved brother-in-Law and Uncle of their families.
All family, relatives and friends of Bill are respectfully invited to attend his funeral service, which will be held on TUESDAY AFTERNOON 7th January 2025, commencing at 1:00pm in the Chaple of Heritage Brady Funeral Directors Crematorium, 76 Maher Rd, Gordonvale.
LIVE STREAM – heritagebradyfunerals.com.au
By Ray Payne OAM – Frontline
Australia Day has become a deeply debated topic, but understanding its true purpose, value, and place in the nation’s identity requires recognising both its historical origins and its evolving meaning in contemporary society. The day, celebrated on January 26, marks the arrival of the First Fleet at Port Jackson in 1788, led by Captain Arthur Phillip. The day originally symbolised the establishment of British sovereignty over the land, which laid the foundations for the modern nation of Australia.
However, in modern times, Australia Day has evolved into a celebration of the nation’s achievements, values, and diverse people. It is a day to reflect on the nation’s history, both the highs and lows, and to recognise the multicultural fabric of Australian society, as well as the freedoms, opportunities, and quality of life Australians enjoy today.
Australia Day is more than just a public holiday; it serves several important purposes. It provides a moment for national pride and unity, offering Australians a chance to reflect on what it means to be Australian, from early settlers to modern immigrants and Indigenous communities. It celebrates the values of freedom, democracy, and equality, recognises Australia’s rich history of migration and multiculturalism, and acknowledges the sacrifices made by past generations to build a prosperous nation.
Beyond its symbolic significance, Australia Day has economic and social value. The day boosts the economy through celebrations, events, and tourism. Local councils, businesses, and community groups host public events that bring people together, fostering social cohesion and promoting a sense of belonging.
Patriotism is essential to maintaining a strong national identity and shared purpose. Countries like the United States and France celebrate their national days with pride, enthusiasm, and unity, reinforcing their citizens’ sense of belonging and national loyalty. Australia, too, needs to embrace patriotism without apology. Patriotism unites a nation, reminding Australians that, despite differences in background or beliefs, they share a common identity and future. It instils pride in the nation’s achievements and ensures Australians defend their core values, such as freedom of speech, democracy, and the rule of law. A strong patriotic culture on Australia Day sends a message that Australians are proud of their history and confident in their future.
The truth of Australia’s history is complex and cannot be ignored. The arrival of the First Fleet in 1788 marked the beginning of colonisation, which had devastating impacts on Indigenous Australians. However, erasing or undermining Australia Day does not change history. Instead, the day should be an opportunity to reflect on the entire history of the nation, both good and bad, and commit to a shared future of reconciliation and unity.
The historical facts surrounding Australia’s development must be acknowledged on Australia Day. This includes recognising the achievements of Indigenous Australians, who have lived on the continent for over 65,000 years; the sacrifices of convicts, settlers, and pioneers who built the modern nation; the contributions of migrants who have made Australia one of the world’s most multicultural societies; and the military sacrifices of Australians who fought to defend the nation’s freedoms. By acknowledging all aspects of history, Australia Day can become a genuine celebration of unity, resilience, and progress.
Political leaders must recognize the importance of Australia Day and offer it total support as a national celebration. The day represents the establishment of the modern Australian state and serves as a symbol of sovereignty and national identity. Attempts to abolish or change the date risk dividing the nation. Political leaders must promote inclusive celebrations that acknowledge Australia’s past while focusing on the future. Supporting Australia Day prevents divisiveness, promotes social cohesion, and ensures the day remains a positive celebration of unity.
Political leaders have a responsibility to defend Australia Day as a unifying event. Without strong political support, the day risks becoming a political battleground rather than a national celebration. Leaders must ensure all Australians feel included in the celebrations and reject efforts to cancel or alter the date in ways that alienate the majority of Australians.
While total political support is essential, so too is the need to make Australia Day more inclusive for all Australians. This can be achieved through education about the true history of Australia, including the stories of both Indigenous Australians and settlers. The focus should be on unity and shared values, highlighting the progress Australia has made as a nation and celebrating the future.
Australia Day should not be seen as a day of division or guilt. It should be a day of national pride, unity, and reflection, a time to acknowledge history, celebrate achievements, and look to the future with optimism. The truth about Australia Day is that it represents the birth of modern Australia, the resilience and achievements of its people, and a commitment to reconciliation and unity.
Political leaders, communities, and individuals alike must embrace the day as an opportunity to strengthen the nation and ensure Australia’s legacy endures for generations to come. As a proud Aussie tradition, Australia Day must be celebrated with vigour, respect, and patriotism, for it reminds us of where we’ve been, who we are, and where we’re going.
Uncover the shocking secrets of Lord Mountbatten in this revealing video. Learn more about Louis Mountbatten and the tragic assassination that shocked the world. The assassination of Louis Mountbatten was described as one of the most tragic deaths in British history. As the years passed, this man became one of the royal family’s most notable characters. His brilliance, decisiveness and hard work set him in a formidable light. But he also had a darker side, ending sadly with an untimed departure when the IRA killed him in 1979. Join me now as we discover the resilient story of Lord Louis Mountbatten.
