Kyiv Independent

On Friday evening, December 27, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed in his daily address that several North Korean soldiers captured in Ukraine had succumbed to their injuries. Zelensky criticized the Russian government for providing these troops with “minimal protection,” highlighting the grim realities of their deployment.

“Our soldiers managed to capture them,” Zelensky stated. “But they were very seriously wounded and could not be saved.” He went on to condemn what he described as “the madness of which dictatorships are capable,” referencing the decision to send soldiers to die “in battles in Europe.”

North Korean Troops in Kursk

According to Ukrainian intelligence, approximately 12,000 North Korean troops, including around 500 officers and three generals, have been stationed in Russia’s Kursk region. This development has raised serious concerns about the escalating internationalisation of the conflict in Ukraine, as well as the treatment and role of foreign soldiers sent to support Russia’s war efforts.

U.S. Response: “Expendable Troops”

The White House has also weighed in on the situation. John Kirby, spokesperson for the National Security Council, commented on reports of North Korean troop casualties, noting that more than a thousand North Korean soldiers had died in “hopeless” assaults in the Kursk region. Kirby condemned the apparent disregard for these soldiers’ lives, asserting that “Russian and North Korean military leaders viewed them as expendable troops.”

The U.S. government has characterized this deployment as a further indicator of the growing desperation and moral bankruptcy of the Kremlin’s strategy in Ukraine. Kirby’s remarks underscore the international community’s concern about Russia’s increasing reliance on foreign manpower, particularly from nations like North Korea that are already under heavy scrutiny for human rights violations.

Geopolitical Implications

The revelation of North Korean involvement in the conflict adds a troubling layer to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Analysts suggest that Pyongyang’s decision to send troops may be tied to a deeper strategic alliance with Moscow, potentially involving arms deals or economic support. Meanwhile, the deployment of North Korean soldiers raises ethical and humanitarian questions, particularly given their apparent use as “cannon fodder” in high-risk operations.

Global Reaction

The involvement of North Korean troops has sparked widespread condemnation from Western nations and human rights organizations. Observers fear that the participation of these soldiers will further complicate efforts to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict. The incident also highlights the broader consequences of authoritarian regimes collaborating in conflicts beyond their borders.

As the war in Ukraine drags on, the deployment of foreign troops—and their subsequent treatment—serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of geopolitical ambitions. The deaths of these North Korean soldiers, unprotected and used in perilous missions, underscore the lengths to which some regimes will go to achieve their objectives. For Ukraine and its allies, the challenge now lies in addressing these developments while continuing to defend against aggression.

ED: Be sure to click on the link within this document and read the newspaper articles of the day.

Not 2010, BUT 1828 at a blistering 53.9 °C

Back before man-made climate change was frying Australia, when CO₂ was around 300ppm, the continent savoured an ideal pre-industrial climate……. RIGHT?

This is the kind of climate we are spending $10bn per annum to get back too…. Right again?

We are told today’s climate has more records and more extremes than times gone by, but the few records we have from the early 1800’s are eye-popping.

Things were not just hotter, but so wildly hot it burst thermometers.

The earliest temperature records we have show that Australia was a land of shocking heatwaves and droughts, except for when it was bitterly cold or raging in flood.

In other words, nothing has changed, except possibly things might not be quite so hot now!

Silliggy (Lance Pidgeon) has been researching records from early explorers and from newspapers.

What he’s uncovered is fascinating!   It’s as if history is being erased!

For all that we hear about recent record-breaking climate extremes, records that are equally extreme, and sometimes even more so, are ignored.

In January 1896 a savage blast “like a furnace” stretched across Australia from east to west and lasted for weeks.

The death toll reached 437 people in the eastern states.

Newspaper reports showed that in Bourke the heat approached 120°F (48.9°C) on three days.

Links to documentary evidence (1)(2)(3)

The maximum at or above 102 degrees F (38.9°C) for 24 days straight!

Use the several links below to read the news reports at the time for yourself ……

1. By Tuesday Jan 14, people were reported falling dead in the streets.
2. Unable to sleep, people in Brewarrina walked the streets at night for hours, thermometers recorded109F at  midnight.
3. Overnight, the temperature did not fall below 103°F.
4. On Jan 18 in Wilcannia, five deaths were recorded in one day, the hospitals were overcrowded and reports said that “more deaths are hourly expected”.
5. By January 24, in Bourke, many businesses had shut down (almost everything bar the hotels).
6. Panic stricken Australians were fleeing to the hills in climate refugee trains.

As reported at the time, the government felt the situation was so serious that to save lives and ease the suffering of its citizens they added cheaper train services:
What I found most interesting about this was the skill, dedication and length of meteorological data taken in the 1800′s. When our climate is “the most important moral challenge” why is it there is so little interest in our longest and oldest data?

Who knew that one of the most meticulous and detailed temperature records in the world from the 1800′s comes from Adelaide, largely thanks to Sir Charles Todd.

The West Terrace site in Adelaide was one of the best in the world at the time and provides accurate historic temperatures from “Australia’s first permanent weather bureau at Adelaide in 1856″.

Rainfall records even appear to go as far back as 1839.  Lance Pidgeon went delving into the National Archives and was surprised at what he found.

The media are in overdrive, making out that “the extreme heat is the new normal” in Australia.

The Great Australian Heatwave of January 2013 didn’t push the mercury above 50C at any weather station in Australia, yet it’s been 50C (122F) and hotter in many inland towns across Australia over the past century.

See how many are in the late 1800′s and early to mid 1900′s.

You can’t blame those high records on man-made global warming!

The Straits Times

The United States maintains air superiority with its two operational fifth-generation stealth fighters, the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II. China, however, is determined to match that prowess. The People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) is advancing its stealth capabilities with the J-35 and J-20 fifth-generation fighters, both designed to evade radar and challenge U.S. dominance.

A Public Debut for the J-35

The J-35 recently captured global attention with its first public display at the Zhuhai Air Show. During a five-minute flight demonstration, the aircraft impressed observers with its agility and speed. These qualities highlight China’s ambition to produce a fighter capable of rivalling the F-35 and even the F-22.

Attendees also examined a J-35 mock-up up close, fuelling speculation that the aircraft could provide the PLAAF with parity or superiority in aerial combat within the Indo-Pacific region. Military analysts see the J-35 as a testament to China’s commitment to modernizing its air force and countering Western dominance.

Carl Schuster, a military analyst and former director of operations at the U.S. Pacific Command’s joint intelligence centre, remarked, “The message [from China’s military] is that they are equal to the U.S. and the rest of the West. U.S. forces have enjoyed air supremacy in every post-World War II conflict. China’s growing air power challenges that now-traditional Western advantage.”

Similarities to the F-35

Critics note that the J-35’s design bears a striking resemblance to the F-35 Lightning II, raising suspicions of cyber-espionage. Past Chinese cyber operations allegedly targeted sensitive data on the F-35, which may have informed the development of the J-35’s avionics and other systems. This resemblance underscores concerns about intellectual property theft in the defence sector.

J-35 Specifications

The J-35 is a medium-sized stealth fighter equipped with features standard to fifth-generation aircraft. These include a twin-engine layout, twin divert-less supersonic intakes, and a single ventral internal weapons bay. Its stealth attributes—such as edge alignment, serrated panelling, smooth external surfaces, and radar-absorbing materials—reflect state-of-the-art design principles.

The aircraft is expected to use the WS-19 engine, a new powerplant distinct from the WS-15 engines of the J-20 Mighty Dragon. The WS-19 promises super cruise capability, thrust vectoring, and speeds exceeding Mach 2. Additionally, the J-35 features an electro-optic/infrared sensor and a wide-angle holographic heads-up display in its cockpit.

Implications for Naval Warfare

The J-35 and J-20 are anticipated to carry advanced weaponry, potentially including anti-ship and air-to-surface capabilities. These features could pose a significant threat to U.S. Navy carrier strike groups. While developing two stealth fighters simultaneously may strain resources and inflate costs, the PLAAF appears committed to maintaining production momentum for both aircraft.

Aerial Combat Prospects

Though the J-35 may not achieve the same level of stealth as the F-35 or F-22, it could still excel in specific scenarios. For instance, it may outperform Taiwanese fighters and older fourth-generation jets like the PLAAF’s J-10 Vigorous Dragon. The real test will be its performance in combat against the world’s premier fifth-generation aircraft.

China’s dual stealth fighter initiative signals its determination to challenge U.S. air supremacy. As the J-35 edges closer to operational deployment, the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific could shift, raising new questions about the future of aerial warfare.

Look at the range of events and support provided to Aboriginal people every year in this country. Yet, when we suggest celebrating one day as a united Australia, we’re accused of being racist and offensive to their culture.

• Funding for Indigenous Communities: The Australian taxpayer contributes over $30 billion annually to Indigenous programs and initiatives. According to the 2021 census, the Indigenous population represents 8% (983,700 people) of the country’s total population, which includes a substantial number of affluent, urban Aboriginal Australians. This is a significant investment, yet we are made to feel guilty for simply wanting a National Day of Unity.
• Rewriting History: I am tired of the constant rhetoric claiming we “invaded” this country. Historical perspectives are complex, but to continually frame our shared history in these terms creates division, not reconciliation.
• Shared Ownership: Politicians and the media often state, “This is their country,” as if the other 96% of Australians don’t also have a right to call this place home. What would Australia be without the millions of people from diverse backgrounds who have contributed to building it into the nation it is today?
• Early Settlers Ignored: I am offended by the lack of recognition for the early settlers who worked tirelessly to establish infrastructure and develop this country. Their contributions have provided the foundation for the quality of life enjoyed by everyone living here today.
• Welcome to Country Ceremonies: While acknowledging culture is important, I am frustrated by the frequency and cost of Welcome to Country ceremonies, which are often taxpayer-funded. This is our shared country—we shouldn’t feel the need to be “welcomed” to it constantly.
• ANZAC Day: It is especially concerning that Welcome to Country has been integrated into ANZAC Day ceremonies. This day should remain focused on honouring all Australians who served and sacrificed for our freedoms.
• Policing and Accountability: Across Australia, police are placed in a difficult position, often vilified by media and politicians when dealing with Aboriginal offenders, regardless of the circumstances.
• Celebrations and Cultural Events: We celebrate Halloween, Chinese New Year, and many other cultural events without controversy. Yet, Australia Day is under attack from left-wing politicians, the media, and woke activists. It’s disheartening to see emotional blackmail being used to pressure Australians into abandoning this important day of national pride and unity.

If this continues, the next steps may include changing the Australian flag or even renaming the country with an Aboriginal name. We must stand firm to preserve our national identity and shared heritage.

Dear Frontline members,

As we welcome the first day of the New Year, Julie and I want to extend our warmest wishes to each one of you. May 2025 bring you good health, happiness, and countless opportunities to enjoy every day.

We truly appreciate all the support you give Frontline, to help maintain my dedication, and passion. You are the heart and soul of Frontline, and we’re grateful to have such a wonderful following.

Here’s to a year filled with exciting adventures, cherished memories, and shared success. Let’s make 2025 a remarkable year together!

With our warmest regards,
Ray and Julie

To any of our members who may be members of the NRMA please be careful of the following scam.

You are required to fill out an official looking SURVEY and fill in your details, and for $3.00 you have to fill in your bank details so they can post you a Tool Kit.

Have checked with the NRMA and it is a scam.

Please be careful so you don’t get caught.

Happy New Year to everyone.

Mal Thiele OAM

I received the following message from Holger Koblitz, should anyone be of assistance could you please send me a message.

I would like to make contact with John Robert (Bob) Goldsmith SN: 214005 ex 1RAR

Bob and I went through Kapooka together. We were very close throughout recruit training and corps training Bob joined 1RAR and I went to 3RAR. Bob went to Vietnam with 1RAR (1st tour) 1965-6 and I followed with 5RAR 1966-7. After our tours we lost touch, and I did not want to see anyone from my past for many decades. Bob did come to visit me, but I was still a bit of a recluse at the time; unfortunately. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards

Holger

CONTACT

Andrew Clinkaberry

1RAR Association

[email protected]

As you may know, I am currently on holiday. While I’ve been able to post to the site occasionally, you might have noticed that the site has been experiencing intermittent outages. Our son Glenn, who designed the site, is working on resolving the issue. However, if the problem cannot be fixed immediately, the site may remain offline until a suitable solution is found. Thank you for your understanding and patience. Let’s hope it’s an easy fix.

Ray

ED: This was sent to me by Ernie Chamberlain – Thanks once again Ernie

The inauguration of the Memorial Park and D445 Battalion Monument in Bà Rịa was celebrated on 22 November 2024.

“The Victory Public Park in Bà Rịa – Vũng Tàu of about 2.5 hectares and costing more than 110 million đồng, has just been inaugurated.

The highlight of the public park is the memorial, and a relief of the victories of the heroic 445 Battalion.” The central granite statue is 25 metres high.

445 Battalion Victory Monument (November 2024)

“445 Battalion (Tiểu đoàn 445) was established on 19 May 1965 in Đất Đỏ District of Bà Rịa – Vũng Tàu Province.

Both sides of the monument formally memorialize the names of 762 ((sic – see footnote^[1])) of the 445 Battalion’s martyrs who died. 1,500 were wounded.”

Former soldiers visited the victory park on its inauguration day, commemorating the Bình Giả Victory on 2 December 1964, and the 80^th anniversary of the establishment of the Vietnam People’s Armed Forces – 22 December 1944 – 22 December 2024.

“… 445 Battalion directly confronted the American forces, their lackeys and vassals (see footnote 2), and the puppet forces in hundreds of battles killing and wounding thousands of the enemy. …  445 Battalion achieved many excellent victories, participating in 1,000 battles, and defeating many strategies and tactics of the enemy. In April 1975, the 445 Battalion coordinated closely with the 3^rd Yellow Star Division to attack and liberate Bà Rịa – Vũng Tàu, contributing significantly to the Spring Victory of 1975. With its excellent special achievements in the Resistance War against the Americans, the 445 Battalion was honoured by the Party and the Nation by the confirmation of the title of Heroic People’s Armed Forces in June 1976.”

Footnote 1: ^[1] The official 2004 Vietnamese-language “History of the D445 Battalion” includes at Attachment II : List of the 445 Battalion’s 539 named Battalion martyrs with date-of-birth,

home village, rank/position, date of death – noting that the list is incomplete and continues to be reviewed.”

Footnote 2: “Australians” – or “Úc”, do not seem to get a specific mention on the memorial/monument or the announcement, but the Vietnamese communists’ “euphemism” for the Australian military was “lackeys/vassals” of the Americans  (see: Chamberlain, E.P., 2016 ; 348,200 words – with maps, photographs – free-to-read on the Internet at:

:  https://www.scribd.com/doc/306536690/The-Viet-Cong-D445-Battalion-Their-Story-and-the-Battle-of-Long-Tan 

^[1] The official 2004 Vietnamese-language “History of the D445 Battalion” includes at Attachment II : List of the Battalion’s 539 named D445 martyrs with date-of-birth, home village, rank/position, date of death – noting that the list is incomplete and continues to be reviewed.