Milestone moment for joint pilot training

Photo: Navy pilot graduate Acting Sub Lieutenant Natika Dunn is awarded with ‘wings’ by Commander Fleet Air Arm Commodore Matthew Royals at 278 ADF Intermediate Pilots Course Graduation at 1 Flying Training School, RAAF Base East Sale. Photo: Flight Lieutenant Daina Sawade.

Acting Sub-Lieutenant Natika Dunn has made history as the first Navy trainee to graduate with wings from 1 Flying Training School at RAAF Base East Sale.

“It’s amazing to be the first Navy graduate here on the east coast,” Acting Sub-Lieutenant Dunn said.

“Being able to complete all my training on the east coast provided a quicker training pipeline, giving us continuous training throughout and support from the same instructors the whole way through.

“I am incredibly happy, it’s been a big year and a half to get here.”

The joint graduation of Navy and Air Force pilots from Course 278 ADF Intermediate Pilots Course marked a significant milestone in the progression of paralleled pilot training schools in Victoria and Western Australia.

Increased flying training capability will enable more ADF pilots to graduate across Australia this year.

Commander Fleet Air Arm Commodore Matthew Royals returned to RAAF Base East Sale to address the graduates as the Reviewing Officer.

Having spent three years of his career instructing students as the Senior Naval Officer at the School of Air Warfare in Sale, Commodore Royals was proud to return and oversee the historic graduation.

“This is not just another graduation, it is a monumental moment in our Defence Force’s history,” Commodore Royals said.

“For the first time, a Royal Australian Navy pilot has completed their entire Intermediate Flying Training here at 1 Flying Training School (FTS), something that has been traditionally shared by 1FTS and 2FTS at RAAF Base Pearce in WA.

“This significant shift underscores the growing integration between our services and demonstrates our collective commitment to a truly unified Defence Force.”

Since 1913, Australian military aviators have proudly worn the Wings badge, awarded to aircrew who have achieved the required proficiency in flying a military aircraft.

More than 100 years later, earning a pilot’s wings remains a significant accomplishment.

 

The Shift to Green Energy: Unveiling the Hidden Costs of Wind Turbines

The Independent

The shift to green energy has seen an exponential rise in the number of wind farms. Wind turbines now dot our landscapes, heralding the promise of a sustainable future. Yet, as compelling as this clean energy source is, it carries with it significant environmental challenges that are often overlooked.

Loss of Wildlife and Koala Habitat

One of the most pressing concerns associated with wind farms is the impact on wildlife. The construction of wind turbines often requires clearing vast areas of land, which leads to the destruction of natural habitats. In Australia, this has resulted in the loss of critical koala habitats. These iconic creatures, already under threat due to deforestation and urban development, now face an additional challenge from wind farm expansions. Disrupting their natural environment has a cascading effect on biodiversity, leading to a decline in various species that depend on these ecosystems.

Bird and Bat Mortality

Wind turbines are notorious for causing bird and bat mortality. The rotating blades, while a marvel of engineering, are a significant threat to avian life. Birds, particularly raptors and migratory species, often fall victim to these spinning giants. The disruption to bat populations is equally concerning, as they play a vital role in controlling insect populations and pollinating plants. The ecological imbalance caused by these fatalities can have long-term repercussions on local ecosystems.

Devastation of the Horizon

The visual impact of wind farms on the horizon is another contentious issue. In rural and coastal areas, where natural landscapes are cherished, the sight of towering wind turbines can be jarring. For many, these structures disrupt the natural beauty of the land and diminish the cultural and aesthetic value of the countryside. This visual pollution can also impact tourism, as visitors may be deterred by the industrial appearance of once-pristine landscapes.

Cost of Construction and Maintenance

The financial cost of constructing and maintaining wind turbines is substantial. Each turbine requires extensive groundwork, including the use of heavy machinery and large-scale construction operations. The ongoing maintenance, particularly in remote areas, adds to the overall cost. While proponents argue that wind energy is cost-effective in the long run, the initial investment and upkeep are significant financial burdens that cannot be ignored.

The Volume of Oil and Concrete Required

Despite being marketed as a green energy solution, wind turbines require large quantities of non-renewable resources during their construction. Each turbine contains several tonnes of steel, copper, and rare earth elements. Additionally, the volume of oil required for lubrication is significant. A typical wind turbine requires hundreds of gallons of oil annually to keep its components running smoothly. Furthermore, each turbine base is anchored by massive concrete foundations, often requiring over 1,000 tonnes of concrete per unit. The environmental footprint of producing and transporting these materials is considerable and contradicts the green narrative.

Reliance on Wind to Generate Power

The effectiveness of wind turbines is inherently tied to the availability of wind. While some regions experience consistent wind patterns, others do not, leading to intermittent energy generation. This reliance on weather conditions makes wind energy less reliable compared to traditional energy sources. To compensate for periods of low wind, backup energy solutions, often fossil-fuel-based, are required to maintain a steady power supply. This dependency undermines the goal of reducing carbon emissions and highlights the limitations of wind energy as a standalone solution.

Conclusion

While wind energy presents an opportunity to move away from fossil fuels, it is essential to acknowledge its environmental and economic drawbacks. The loss of wildlife habitats, bird mortality, visual impact, high construction costs, and reliance on non-renewable resources challenge the perception of wind turbines as a wholly green solution. As we transition towards a more sustainable future, it is crucial to balance renewable energy initiatives with the protection of our natural environment. A comprehensive approach that includes careful site selection, wildlife protection measures, and diversified energy sources will be necessary to achieve truly sustainable energy solutions.

 

Ukraine Intensifies Cross-Border Offensive in Kursk Region as Peace Talks Loom

Ukraine has launched a renewed cross-border offensive in Russia’s Kursk region, aiming to bolster its territorial gains ahead of potential peace negotiations. This escalation comes as U.S. President-elect Donald Trump reiterates his intention to end the conflict swiftly once he takes office.

Reports of the offensive began circulating over the weekend, with unverified footage shared by Russian military bloggers showing a convoy of Ukrainian tanks and armoured vehicles advancing toward the village of Berdin. This village lies just beyond the territory currently controlled by Ukraine in the Kursk region.

Kyiv has not officially confirmed the new operation. However, Andriy Yermak, head of the Ukrainian presidential office, hinted at progress, stating, “Kursk region, good news. Russia is getting what it deserves.” Meanwhile, Andrii Kovalenko, head of Ukraine’s Centre for Countering Disinformation, confirmed that Ukrainian forces had launched coordinated attacks on multiple fronts within Kursk.

Russian military bloggers, often privy to frontline realities, acknowledged the Ukrainian offensive with concern. Yuri Podolyaka, a prominent blogger, wrote on Telegram, “The morning in the Kursk region starts worryingly again. Yesterday’s failure won’t deter the enemy from trying again today.”

The U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) confirmed that Ukrainian forces had advanced into the southern outskirts of Berdin. The village lies northeast of Sudzha, the largest area captured by Ukraine during its initial incursion five months ago. The ISW reported that Ukraine’s forces were attacking in at least three areas: toward Berdin, toward Pushkarnoye to the east, and around Korenevo to the west.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in his nightly address on Saturday, highlighted the heavy casualties inflicted on Russian and North Korean forces near the village of Makhnovka, southeast of Sudzha. Citing General Oleksandr Syrskyi, he stated that hundreds of Russian and allied troops had been killed in the battle.

Other reports from Russian military sources indicated that Ukraine’s offensive involved hundreds of troops in a heavily mechanized assault. Analysts suggest that Kyiv’s actions could be aimed at diverting Russian forces from their gradual advance in eastern Ukraine, particularly in Donetsk. On Monday, Russia’s defence ministry announced its capture of Kurakhove in Donetsk after prolonged fighting.

Ukraine’s ability to maintain control over parts of Kursk is seen as a strategic advantage in upcoming peace talks. Russia still holds about 20% of Ukrainian territory after nearly three years of conflict. Securing a foothold in Russian territory strengthens Kyiv’s negotiating position as both sides prepare for diplomacy.

Both nations are racing to secure battlefield advantages before Trump’s inauguration on January 20. The incoming U.S. president has repeatedly pledged to end the war within 24 hours of taking office, though he has yet to outline his specific plan.

Since Ukraine’s daring cross-border assault on August 6 last year, Russian forces, aided by approximately 11,000 North Korean troops, have steadily pushed back Kyiv’s gains in Kursk. However, recent Ukrainian advancements suggest a renewed effort to solidify control over the contested region.

During a visit to South Korea over the weekend, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken emphasized the strategic importance of Ukraine’s hold on parts of Kursk. “The positions of Ukraine’s armed forces in the Kursk region are crucial for any future negotiations,” Blinken stated, underscoring the significance of Kyiv’s territorial gains ahead of diplomatic discussions.

As the conflict intensifies, both Ukraine and Russia appear focused on shaping the battlefield in their favour, setting the stage for high-stakes negotiations in the coming months.

 

VALE – 215309 William Michael (Bill) HALL – 1RAR 1965-66

Bill Hall served in 7PL C COY 1RAR in Vietnam and was awarded a Commendation for Gallantry, he was a very popular member of the company and will be greatly missed.

Late of Granadilla Drive, Earlville FNQLD, aged 80 years. Most dearly loved husband of Kath, loved father and father-in-law of Michael, Trevor, Darren and Devon, loved grandfather of Nirvana, Tina, Tyler, Jack and Layla, loved brother of Robyn, Brian and Joan (dec’d), Loved brother-in-Law and Uncle of their families.

All family, relatives and friends of Bill are respectfully invited to attend his funeral service, which will be held on TUESDAY AFTERNOON 7th January 2025, commencing at 1:00pm in the Chaple of Heritage Brady Funeral Directors Crematorium, 76 Maher Rd, Gordonvale.

LIVE STREAM – heritagebradyfunerals.com.au

 

AUSTRALIA DAY IS ABOUT PATRIOTISM.

By Ray Payne OAM – Frontline

Australia Day has become a deeply debated topic, but understanding its true purpose, value, and place in the nation’s identity requires recognising both its historical origins and its evolving meaning in contemporary society. The day, celebrated on January 26, marks the arrival of the First Fleet at Port Jackson in 1788, led by Captain Arthur Phillip. The day originally symbolised the establishment of British sovereignty over the land, which laid the foundations for the modern nation of Australia.

However, in modern times, Australia Day has evolved into a celebration of the nation’s achievements, values, and diverse people. It is a day to reflect on the nation’s history, both the highs and lows, and to recognise the multicultural fabric of Australian society, as well as the freedoms, opportunities, and quality of life Australians enjoy today.

Australia Day is more than just a public holiday; it serves several important purposes. It provides a moment for national pride and unity, offering Australians a chance to reflect on what it means to be Australian, from early settlers to modern immigrants and Indigenous communities. It celebrates the values of freedom, democracy, and equality, recognises Australia’s rich history of migration and multiculturalism, and acknowledges the sacrifices made by past generations to build a prosperous nation.

Beyond its symbolic significance, Australia Day has economic and social value. The day boosts the economy through celebrations, events, and tourism. Local councils, businesses, and community groups host public events that bring people together, fostering social cohesion and promoting a sense of belonging.

Patriotism is essential to maintaining a strong national identity and shared purpose. Countries like the United States and France celebrate their national days with pride, enthusiasm, and unity, reinforcing their citizens’ sense of belonging and national loyalty. Australia, too, needs to embrace patriotism without apology. Patriotism unites a nation, reminding Australians that, despite differences in background or beliefs, they share a common identity and future. It instils pride in the nation’s achievements and ensures Australians defend their core values, such as freedom of speech, democracy, and the rule of law. A strong patriotic culture on Australia Day sends a message that Australians are proud of their history and confident in their future.

The truth of Australia’s history is complex and cannot be ignored. The arrival of the First Fleet in 1788 marked the beginning of colonisation, which had devastating impacts on Indigenous Australians. However, erasing or undermining Australia Day does not change history. Instead, the day should be an opportunity to reflect on the entire history of the nation, both good and bad, and commit to a shared future of reconciliation and unity.

The historical facts surrounding Australia’s development must be acknowledged on Australia Day. This includes recognising the achievements of Indigenous Australians, who have lived on the continent for over 65,000 years; the sacrifices of convicts, settlers, and pioneers who built the modern nation; the contributions of migrants who have made Australia one of the world’s most multicultural societies; and the military sacrifices of Australians who fought to defend the nation’s freedoms. By acknowledging all aspects of history, Australia Day can become a genuine celebration of unity, resilience, and progress.

Political leaders must recognize the importance of Australia Day and offer it total support as a national celebration. The day represents the establishment of the modern Australian state and serves as a symbol of sovereignty and national identity. Attempts to abolish or change the date risk dividing the nation. Political leaders must promote inclusive celebrations that acknowledge Australia’s past while focusing on the future. Supporting Australia Day prevents divisiveness, promotes social cohesion, and ensures the day remains a positive celebration of unity.

Political leaders have a responsibility to defend Australia Day as a unifying event. Without strong political support, the day risks becoming a political battleground rather than a national celebration. Leaders must ensure all Australians feel included in the celebrations and reject efforts to cancel or alter the date in ways that alienate the majority of Australians.

While total political support is essential, so too is the need to make Australia Day more inclusive for all Australians. This can be achieved through education about the true history of Australia, including the stories of both Indigenous Australians and settlers. The focus should be on unity and shared values, highlighting the progress Australia has made as a nation and celebrating the future.

Australia Day should not be seen as a day of division or guilt. It should be a day of national pride, unity, and reflection, a time to acknowledge history, celebrate achievements, and look to the future with optimism. The truth about Australia Day is that it represents the birth of modern Australia, the resilience and achievements of its people, and a commitment to reconciliation and unity.

Political leaders, communities, and individuals alike must embrace the day as an opportunity to strengthen the nation and ensure Australia’s legacy endures for generations to come. As a proud Aussie tradition, Australia Day must be celebrated with vigour, respect, and patriotism, for it reminds us of where we’ve been, who we are, and where we’re going.

 

Lord Mountbatten’s Shocking Secrets Revealed

Uncover the shocking secrets of Lord Mountbatten in this revealing video. Learn more about Louis Mountbatten and the tragic assassination that shocked the world. The assassination of Louis Mountbatten was described as one of the most tragic deaths in British history. As the years passed, this man became one of the royal family’s most notable characters. His brilliance, decisiveness and hard work set him in a formidable light. But he also had a darker side, ending sadly with an untimed departure when the IRA killed him in 1979. Join me now as we discover the resilient story of Lord Louis Mountbatten.

The Bruce Highway is Set for Major Safety Upgrades

Photo: The Bruce Highway is notorious for the bad condition of its road surface. (ABC News: Russel Talbot/Facebook)

The Albanese government has announced a $7.2 billion investment to improve safety and resilience along the Bruce Highway, which connects key regional centres such as Bundaberg, Rockhampton, Mackay, and Townsville. This critical route supports around 62 per cent of Queensland’s population and underpins the state’s economic and social connectivity.

The federal government says the funds will ensure priority sections of the highway meet a minimum three-star safety rating under the international road assessment system. Currently, nearly half the highway is rated at just two stars, posing significant safety risks to motorists.

Key sections targeted for upgrades include Maryborough to Benaraby, Rockhampton to St Lawrence, Bowen to Townsville, and Ingham to Innisfail. The funding will focus on installing safety barriers, widening road shoulders, creating additional overtaking lanes, and improving rest areas. Audible tactile line markings and wider centre lines will also be introduced to reduce head-on collisions by providing drivers with immediate feedback if they veer out of their lane.

In response to Queensland’s harsh weather conditions, the project will also prioritise resealing and rehabilitating sections of the highway damaged by floods and storms. These upgrades aim to make the Bruce Highway more resilient to future weather events and reduce costly disruptions.

Federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King highlighted the importance of the project, stating, “This historic investment answers the call of Queenslanders to bring the Bruce Highway up to a three-star safety rating, so Australians stop losing their loved ones on this road.”

Critics have pointed out that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is using taxpayer-funded infrastructure projects to bolster his political campaign in Queensland, where road safety is a key issue. Despite earlier calls from the federal government for a 50:50 funding split, Labor will cover 80 per cent of the costs for these upgrades.

“Queensland deserves a long-term plan, and that is what my government is delivering,” Mr Albanese said, framing the investment as a critical step toward modernising one of the state’s most vital transport routes. While the upgrades are expected to save lives, the political debate over funding arrangements continues.

Government Waste: Welcome to Country Costs Soar.

Aussie taxpayers have shelled out more than $450,000 over the past two years for government departments to host Welcome to Country ceremonies — an expenditure that raises serious questions about priorities. With Aboriginal health outcomes still lagging significantly behind non-Indigenous Australians, it’s time to ask if these funds are being spent wisely.

Freedom of Information requests reveal that the Infrastructure Department spent $35,618 on Welcomes, while the Industry, Science, and Resources Department allocated $30,896. In total, 33 ceremonies from various agencies drained hundreds of thousands of dollars from the public purse. Opposition waste reduction spokesman James Stevens called the amount “staggering.”

It’s essential to respect and acknowledge Indigenous culture, but has Welcome to Country become more about optics than outcomes? Critics, including Shadow Indigenous Australians Minister Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, argue that the ceremonies have evolved into a commercial product rather than a genuine cultural expression. Ms. Price has pointed out that some individuals make their entire livelihood from delivering these ceremonies, turning cultural acknowledgment into a money-making enterprise.

Meanwhile, pressing issues in Indigenous communities remain unaddressed. Poor health outcomes, limited access to education, and inadequate housing continue to plague remote areas. The money spent on Welcome to Country ceremonies could be better directed toward real solutions that improve lives and close the gap.

Even within Indigenous communities, discontent is growing. The Juru people of north Queensland recently banned Welcome to Country ceremonies on their ancestral land, citing overuse and misuse by individuals with little connection to the area. Juru spokesperson Randall Ross labelled the practice an “insult” to traditional owners.

Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country. What they need is accountability for how taxpayer money is spent. Let’s prioritise practical, lasting change over symbolic gestures.

Why is Australia Preparing for War with China?

Is an invasion of Australia by China possible? Rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific, military buildups, and fears over Taiwan have Australians on edge. Experts warn Australia could be dragged into a U.S.-China conflict—or face direct threats from Beijing. This video dives into the risks, military comparisons, and the strategic stakes for both nations. Is Australia ready for such a challenge?