VALE: 231055 CAPT Paul William Hayton (Nicholas)

17 July 1963 – 11 October 2024

Aged 61 Years

Paul joined the Army in 1982 and originally served with RA Inf posted to 3 Bn (Para) AR.   He transferred to RACMP in 1985 and during his career served with 2 MP Coy, 4 MP Coy, MP School and 5 MP Coy (SIB).   Paul also saw service in Malaysia & Timor.

LEST WE FORGET

Rest in peace digger, you have done your job

and are no longer in pain.

Thank you for your service, you are now in God’s hands.

He will look after you.

Funeral Arrangements:   Private family arrangements.

Condolences to:   TBA

Still Travelling

Well, I hope you are all missing the full coverage on Frontline, we are still travelling and having great weather and visiting many wonderful places along the Queensland coastline. We called into Camp Gregory, a veteran’s free camp at Woodgate it was great to see the progress that has been made over the years since Roger Dwyer first started the retreat. It is totally free for veterans and first responders. If you don’t have a caravan or RV, no worries they have dongers available … I recommend Camp Gregory as a place to relax, catch some fish or crabs.

I don’t think I will be able to post to Frontline for the next three days, doubt we will have any internet.

Take care

Ray

Exposing the ABC Four Corners’ Misinformation: Nuclear Energy for Australia

Nuclear for Australia

On Monday, ABC’s Four Corners aired an episode titled “Nuclear Gamble”, exploring the use of nuclear energy in the United States and what it could mean for Australia’s energy future. In response, we conducted a live fact-check (available here) and identified several factual inaccuracies that have since prompted the ABC to make multiple corrections and concessions. However, these changes only scratch the surface of the broader issues with the program.

We’ve uncovered several fundamental errors that we believe warrant the episode’s removal from public viewing. A key narrative in the episode was the claim that the Vogtle Nuclear Plant in Georgia was the primary driver of rising power bills for Georgia residents. However, after reaching out to the Georgia Public Service Commission, which oversees electricity rates, we learned that this is a misleading oversimplification. The Commission exclusively informed us that while Plant Vogtle may be an easy target, it was not the primary source of the rate increases. Four Corners failed to mention other contributing factors, thereby presenting an inaccurate and one-sided argument to their viewers.

In addition to this, the program omitted critical details, such as the conflicts of interest of guests like Malcolm Turnbull, Simon Holmes à Court, and Peter Bradford. They also failed to thoroughly examine the CSIRO’s GenCost report, which has been the foundation of many anti-nuclear claims. Furthermore, they incorrectly suggested that nuclear plants lack operational flexibility, a point which is not supported by global data.

In light of these findings, we have submitted a formal complaint to the ABC, demanding that the episode be pulled from their platform. Our findings have already gained traction, with Ben Fordham Live, Australia’s largest talkback radio show, sharing our conclusions. More media outlets are expected to cover this critical issue in the coming days.

Adding to the growing support for nuclear energy, the U.S. Department of Energy recently released an updated Nuclear Liftoff Report, which contains several significant insights:

  1. The system cost of electricity with a combination of nuclear and renewables is approximately 30% lower than relying solely on renewables, with California as a prime example. California already has more renewable energy than Australia, making this comparison particularly relevant.
  2. Jobs in the nuclear energy sector pay roughly 50% higher than those in solar or wind industries.
  3. The GenCost report by the CSIRO drastically underestimates the potential lifespan of nuclear plants, assuming a 30-year operational life. The Department of Energy, however, estimates an 80-year lifespan, making nuclear a far more sustainable option than previously suggested.
  4. Nuclear power surpasses renewables in several key areas: it produces the lowest emissions, offers the most reliable energy, requires the least land, and uses fewer materials.

Nuclear for Australia played a key role in bringing this report to Australian media attention. Through our global networks and media partnerships, we ensured that this critical report received coverage in major outlets, including The Australian, Sky News Australia, and 2GB.

We will continue to disseminate these findings to ensure that Australians have access to the best global information on nuclear energy. We also call on anti-nuclear politicians and activists to engage with these reports and reconsider their positions based on the latest evidence.

 

VETERANS HEALTH WEEK 2024

Staying Connected: A Lifeline for Veterans’ Health Week

As veterans, we’ve all faced our fair share of challenges. Some days, we feel like we can conquer anything; on other days, it’s a struggle just to keep going. One key factor in navigating these ups and downs? Staying connected. It might seem simple, but maintaining strong social ties can be a game changer for both your mental and physical well-being.

It’s more than just firing off a quick text or liking a post on social media. True connection means having meaningful conversations, sharing experiences, and knowing that when things get tough, someone’s got your back. Research shows that a solid support network can improve your mood, boost your immune system, and help stave off feelings of loneliness. In fact, it can even reduce the risk of developing mental health conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why Connection Matters

Whether it’s catching up for a BBQ, attending local events, or just checking in with a mate, staying connected directly impacts how you feel day to day. Here’s why it’s so important:

  1. Emotional Support: We all have moments when life feels overwhelming. Reaching out to others can pull you out of those tough spots. Simply knowing someone’s there makes a world of difference.
  2. Physical Health Benefits: Your social connections can have a profound effect on your physical health, too. Studies show that veterans who stay engaged with others tend to have lower blood pressure, healthier hearts, and even live longer.
  3. Sense of Belonging: During service, being part of a team was ingrained in us. Finding that sense of community in civilian life is just as crucial, whether it’s through veteran groups, social clubs, or reconnecting with family.

Preventing Isolation Through Online Veteran Networks

In today’s digital age, staying connected isn’t limited to face-to-face meetups. Online communities and veteran information services offer a wealth of resources to help veterans stay informed and engaged. Platforms like DVA’s Veteran Services Online, RSL’s Connect or Frontline Veterans Network not only provide valuable news and updates but also give veterans an easy way to find support networks, mental health resources, and local veteran-friendly events. This digital connection helps bridge the gap for those who may feel isolated or unable to physically connect.

Take Action During Veteran Health Week

Veteran life doesn’t have to be a solo mission. We’ve all been through a lot, and sometimes just knowing there’s someone who truly understands can make all the difference. As Veteran Health Week approaches, take the opportunity to reach out—whether it’s reconnecting with an old mate or exploring a new online veteran group. Staying connected is good for the mind, body, and spirit. It’s a vital part of maintaining health, and it’s something we all deserve.

Remember, you’re not alone—there’s a community out there, waiting to welcome you.

Death Notice 215825 Maurice Malcolm Pearce – RAA

We have been advised of the death on 9 October 2024 of Maurice Malcolm
Pearce. Known as Mal, he was 79. Mal served in Vietnam with 1st Field
Regiment from September 1966 until June 1967 as a Section Commander. He
returned to Vietnam from May to December 1971 as a Forward Observer working
with the Kiwi’s. Mal died not long after surgery. There will not be a
funeral however a memorial service will be held on a date to be advised.

RIP Maurice Malcolm Pearce

Peter Bruce, OAM
Obituary Resource Officer
RAAHC
[email protected]

Autonomous Systems: A New Frontier for Military Safety and Efficiency

Remotely Operated Ground Unit for Expeditionary (ROGUE) – Fires vehicle with Forterra’s self-driving system called AutoDrive navigates off-road terrain. (Photo courtesy of Forterra)

Manned missile batteries face significant risks in modern warfare. Once fired, these systems become highly visible to enemy sensors, making them vulnerable to counter-battery fire. Autonomous, unmanned systems offer a solution by mitigating these risks. The use of such systems allows for faster, safer operations, keeping human operators at a safe distance.

For example, an enemy warship can detect an anti-ship ballistic missile’s launch and rapidly return fire. Even small quadcopters can transmit a missile battery’s position to adversaries, increasing the threat to human operators. Scott Sanders, former Marine Special Operations Officer, emphasized the danger: “If you don’t move fast enough, you risk losing both equipment and personnel.” This highlights the urgent need for systems that can fire and relocate autonomously, reducing the exposure of soldiers and marines.

Currently, field artillery teams operate quickly, but advanced enemy capabilities in the electromagnetic spectrum make them vulnerable before they can retreat. Autonomous systems, like Forterra’s Remotely Operated Ground Unit for Expeditionary (ROGUE) Fires under the Navy Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System (NMESIS), provide a critical advantage. These unmanned platforms can manoeuvre and fire faster than crewed systems, allowing for quick response while reducing the risk to human life.

The benefits of autonomous systems extend beyond just missile operations. These systems can support counterterrorism, logistics, reconnaissance, and infrastructure protection. Autonomous platforms minimize the risk to soldiers in hazardous environments like urban warfare or areas with chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threats. By operating without humans onboard, these systems allow for greater firepower projection and sensor deployment without risking personnel.

Forterra, a leader in ground-based autonomy, has been at the forefront of developing these systems. Their technology has been integrated into various defence vehicles, providing unmatched reliability and scalability. Forterra’s unmanned systems, like the ROGUE Fires, allow the Marine Corps and Army to enhance their logistics and combat capabilities without putting additional personnel in harm’s way.

As military forces continue to evolve, autonomy will play an essential role in keeping soldiers safe while maintaining operational effectiveness. These systems are not only functional but are already being deployed, proving that autonomous technology is ready to transform modern warfare.

 

The Game-Changing Impact of Commercial Drones on Modern Warfare

An award-winning essay by an RAAF corporal lays out the significant challenges posed by commercially available drones in the military sphere.

One of the most significant shifts in modern warfare has been the rise of commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) drones. These inexpensive, readily available systems have transformed battlefields from Ukraine to the Middle East, posing new threats that military forces around the world must address. Corporal Ryan Hodson, in his essay for the Air Force Writing Competition, highlights the profound implications these drones hold for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and broader defence strategies.

The COTS Drone Threat

While larger, military-grade drones have captured attention for their capabilities, it’s the smaller, commercial drones that are making a particularly game-changing impact. Sold for civilian use, these drones are fast, agile, and can be easily weaponized. Corporal Hodson’s essay, titled The Weaponisation of Toys and Implications for the Air Force, delves into the real-world challenges these drones pose to defence forces.

One of the most alarming aspects of COTS drones is their speed. Even hobbyist drones can reach speeds of up to 80 km/h, while racing drones can exceed 120 km/h. Despite their small size, these drones pose a ballistic threat, simply due to their velocity. When paired with weapons such as an RPG warhead, their versatility becomes clear—they can approach targets quickly and silently, avoiding detection by traditional methods. Unlike conventional anti-tank missiles, drones do not emit an infrared (IR) plume, meaning they can strike from above with little warning.

Detection and Countermeasures

One of the most significant challenges posed by COTS drones is their detection. Unlike military drones, which often have distinctive features, commercial drones come in a variety of shapes and sizes. Their small size and ability to manoeuvre through urban environments make them difficult to detect using traditional radar systems. This has forced militaries to consider integrating a combination of optical, thermal, and acoustic sensors to improve detection accuracy.

However, as Hodson explains, integrating these systems creates another problem—more data is added to the decision-making loop, which can slow response times. Furthermore, the interconnected nature of these detection platforms exposes new vulnerabilities. By linking sensors to central nodes for real-time data sharing, the risk of cyberattacks increases. In essence, these drones not only pose a physical threat but also become a vector for cyber warfare, expanding the attack surface for adversaries.

Counter-Drone Operations and Complications

Countering drones is more complex than it seems. While jamming systems may disable enemy drones, they can also disrupt friendly forces’ operations. This “fratricide” has been observed in the Ukraine conflict, where jamming efforts have impacted both enemy and allied drones, as well as critical radar and communication systems. In urban areas, jamming signals can inadvertently affect civilian infrastructure, such as GPS systems used by commercial air traffic.

More aggressive, hard-kill options, like close-in weapon systems (CIWS), present their own challenges. While they may effectively neutralize a drone, using such force in civilian areas could cause collateral damage, making them unsuitable in many situations.

The Need for Education and Speed

Trust is another key factor when dealing with the drone threat. With the speed at which drones can approach a target and the challenges of positively identifying whether a drone is a threat, military personnel must be well-trained to respond appropriately. For Hodson, education is essential to help pilots and operators understand how detection systems work and how to counter drone threats quickly and effectively.

The speed of innovation is a crucial point that Hodson raises. Not only are drones themselves fast, but the technology behind them is evolving rapidly. Defence forces must keep up with this pace to ensure they can adapt to new challenges and remain effective.

Navigating Legal and Operational Challenges

One of the trickiest aspects of COTS drone warfare is the overlap between civilian and military use. Drones already present problems in restricted airspaces, often due to hobbyists flying too close to sensitive areas. This raises difficult questions—how does one differentiate between an innocent mistake and a deliberate threat? Additionally, the increasing use of 5G and 6G networks complicates matters further, as these congested spectrums must now accommodate both civilian and military uses.

Hodson warns that while the threat of COTS drones is not immediate, it is significant. Drones have already been used to complement first strikes, as seen in Hamas’ use of them to overwhelm air defences. While they may not represent a complete paradigm shift, drones are nonetheless an evolving threat that demands attention.

Conclusion

CPL Hodson’s essay underscores the growing need for the RAAF and other defence organizations to recognize the implications of commercial drone technology. As drones become more accessible and versatile, defence forces must adapt their strategies to detect, counter, and defend against them. By educating personnel, investing in advanced detection systems, and addressing the legal and operational challenges posed by COTS drones, militaries can better prepare for the future of warfare.

You can read the full Corporal Margaret Clarke Award-winning essay, The Weaponisation of Toys and Implications for the Air Forcehere.

 

Support ADF Pride: Embrace Uniforms for National Unity

Over recent decades, an unofficial rule has emerged within the Australian Defence Force (ADF) discouraging personnel from wearing their uniforms in public. Concerns about eliciting negative reactions from civilians, internal perceptions of public uniform display as “cringeworthy,” and fears of intense media scrutiny have contributed to this trend. While these concerns are valid, they have hindered the positive promotion of the ADF’s image—at a time when such visibility is sorely needed.

The ADF faces significant recruitment challenges, with its personnel numbers well below target. The Defence Strategic Review (DSR) in 2023 called for a faster recruitment process and a strategic overhaul, including a review of the Reserves. Yet, with Australia seeking to grow its forces to 80,000 uniformed personnel by 2040, achieving this goal will require more than just policy shifts. A national culture shift is needed to reframe how Australians view their military.

Historically, Australia’s treatment of uniformed personnel has been mixed. Vietnam veterans were instructed to hide their service due to public hostility. More recently, ADF personnel have been discouraged from wearing uniforms in public during the Afghanistan conflict, out of fear of terrorist targeting. However, as those threats have waned, so too should the reluctance to allow uniformed presence in everyday life.

In contrast to this cautious approach, other nations proudly showcase their military. The US, for example, has long embraced the sight of uniformed soldiers in public, promoting a sense of unity and patriotism. For Australia, allowing and encouraging ADF personnel to wear their uniforms outside of strictly controlled environments could foster similar national pride and inspire future recruits.

With recruitment numbers falling, it’s essential that Australians see their military as part of the community, not just on Anzac Day. The ADF has an opportunity to lead a national reset, allowing soldiers to wear their uniforms with pride, reflecting the honour of their service. It’s time to embrace a new era where military service is celebrated and normalised, fostering both recruitment and a stronger, more united nation.

 

Betrayed by the System: The Heartbreaking Story of Jo Tarnawsky

ABC NEWS

The conduct of the Deputy Prime Minister’s office has left many feeling deeply disappointed. Jo Tarnawsky, a respected career public servant and chief of staff to Richard Marles, has come forward with troubling claims that she was pushed out of her job after raising concerns of bullying among her colleagues. Despite remaining officially employed, Tarnawsky says she has been denied access to her office since June and has had no communication with the Deputy Prime Minister for months.

While she does not accuse Mr. Marles of directly bullying her, Tarnawsky feels she has been systematically “bullied out of her job.” In a rare public statement, she expressed her frustration at being frozen out, saying, “No fair process has been followed. I continue to be employed officially as the deputy prime minister’s chief of staff, but I have been prevented from doing my job.” Tarnawsky made these comments at a media conference, where she declined to take any questions.

Accompanied by her lawyer, Michael Bradley, Tarnawsky explained that she had privately raised concerns about bullying in the office while returning from a trip to Ukraine with Marles. She claims that, instead of addressing the issues, the Deputy Prime Minister suggested she start looking for other employment and forced her to take several weeks of leave. Upon trying to return to work in June, she was informed she could not return to her role or office, further deepening her sense of betrayal.

Tarnawsky has been outspoken about the emotional toll of the past months, detailing how she has suffered from depression, anxiety, panic attacks, and suicidal thoughts. “I had none of these symptoms before May 2024,” she shared. “The way I have been treated has been cowardly, cruel, and completely unnecessary.”

Despite these harrowing revelations, neither Tarnawsky nor her lawyer provided details about the original bullying allegations, leaving the public in the dark about the specific concerns she raised. The Deputy Prime Minister’s office, while contesting parts of Tarnawsky’s account, insists that she has been treated with “respect and courtesy” and that the Albanese government is committed to improving workplace culture.

However, the failure of the Minister to engage directly with his chief of staff during these tumultuous months raises serious questions about the Department’s commitment to fairness, transparency, and the well-being of its employees. While Marles expressed his sadness over the situation, his statements lack any real sense of accountability or willingness to address the deeper cultural issues at play.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has called Tarnawsky “incredibly brave” for coming forward, adding to the growing sentiment that her claims warrant serious scrutiny. Tarnawsky’s heartbreaking account has left many asking if this is yet another example of power being wielded unjustly in Parliament, leaving those most vulnerable without recourse or protection. The lack of clear action and transparency is deeply disappointing, casting a shadow over those who are supposed to lead by example.

 

Giving sad news to the troops

The Captain called the Sergeant in. “Sarge, I just got a telegram that Private Jones’ mother died yesterday. Better go tell him and send him in to see me.”

So, the Sergeant calls for his morning formation and lines up all the troops. “Listen up, men,” says the Sergeant. “Johnson, report to the mess hall for KP. Smith, report to Personnel to sign some papers. The rest of you men report to the Motor Pool for maintenance. Oh by the way, Jones, your mother died, report to the commander.

Later that day the Captain called the Sergeant into his office. “Hey, Sarge, that was a pretty cold way to inform Jones his mother died. Couldn’t you be a bit more tactful, next time?”

“Yes, sir,” answered the Sarge.

A few months later, the Captain called the Sergeant in again with, “Sarge, I just got a telegram that Private McGrath’s mother died. You’d better go tell him and send him in to see me. This time be more tactful.”

So, the Sergeant calls for his morning formation. “Ok, men, fall in and listen up.” “Everybody with a mother alive, take two steps forward.” “Not so fast, McGrath!”