Australia, UK, and US Successfully Trial AI-Enabled UAVs and Autonomous Capabilities Under AUKUS

DSTL Media

Picture: AUKUS AI enabled drones to reduce enemy target identification time (US DoD)

Australia, alongside the UK and the US, has successfully trialled advanced artificial intelligence (AI) enabled uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other autonomous technologies, aiming to reduce the time needed to identify enemy targets. This collaborative effort marks a significant step forward in the AUKUS partnership’s focus on enhancing military capabilities through cutting-edge technology.

The trial is part of the broader AUKUS Resilient and Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Technologies (RAAIT) initiative, a key component of the trilateral security pact. The UK’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) announced today that the exercise represented “the first use of autonomy and AI sensing systems in a real-time military environment,” highlighting its significance in modern warfare.

Although the announcement was made today, the trial took place earlier this year during the US-hosted multinational Project Convergence Capstone 4 technology experimentation exercise. During this exercise, drones from Australia, the UK, and the US operated together in the same airspace, guided by an AUKUS AI team that retrained and deployed AI onto these platforms. The AI-enabled UAVs demonstrated their potential by allowing human operators to efficiently “locate, disable, and destroy targets on the ground.”

The successful trial underscored the progress made by the AUKUS partners in integrating AI and autonomous systems, showcasing the “seamless exchange of data and control” across technologies from the three nations. This development aligns with the broader objectives of AUKUS Pillar II, which focuses on advanced technologies such as AI, hypersonic missiles, and quantum computing, separate from the primary focus of Pillar I on nuclear-powered submarines for Australia.

As these AI and autonomous capabilities continue to be refined, they are expected to be incorporated into national platforms, providing the military with a quicker response to current and future threats. Although no specific timeframe has been provided, the trial builds on previous demonstrations, including a successful AI swarm test in Wiltshire, England, last year. During that test, a collection of AUKUS “AI-enabled assets” worked together as a swarm to detect and track targets, paving the way for future advancements in autonomous military technologies.

COMMENT – LONG TAN AUSTRALIA’S VIETNAM STORY

ED: For those of you who haven’t read the comments on the website, the following was written by Ernie Chamberlain

Readers will have noted several errors in this 22-minute video. In particular, five times the narrator refers to the enemy force at the Battle of Long Tân as: “NVA,” “North Vietnamese troops/forces.” However, the principal enemy force elements were the 275th VC Main Force Regiment and the D445 VC Local Force Battalion.

Data on the strength and composition of the 275th VC Regiment at the Battle can be determined from the detailed notebook of the 275th VC Regiment quartermaster, Đào Thanh Xuân. This document, captured in early February 1968 by 2RAR/NZ (ANZAC) during Operation Coburg, was only recently translated and analyzed. The notebook’s entries can probably be regarded as far more factual than accounts published in post-war Vietnamese histories, such as those of the 5th VC Division (2005), the 275th VC Main Force Regiment (2015), and the D445 Local Force Battalion (1991 and 2004).

The quartermaster’s notebook records his detailed strength-reckoning of the Regiment on 20 August (i.e., two days after the Long Tân battle). This list totaled “852,” which is 159 less than the Regiment’s strength figure of 1,011 that he had recorded on 9 August. On the D445 VC Battalion’s strength, the biannual reports of its commanding officer, Bùi Quang Chánh, and its political officer, Đỗ Văn Liên, dated July and early August 1966, respectively, show that the Battalion’s strength was “403” and “392.”

Of course, any enemy KIA or WIA figures for the Long Tân battle would also have to include probably quite small numbers from HQ 5th VC Division elements, the HQ Bà Rịa-Long Khánh-Biên Hòa Province Unit, the Võ Thị Sáu Civil Labour Company, C.12-65 Bình Giã Assault Youth Unit, the “Surgery Element,” reconnaissance elements (5th VC Division; and C.982), and possibly a Z39 artillery element.

The seemingly macabre and petty “accounting” related above is perhaps not particularly relevant to the main story of that fierce battle in August 1966. On claims of “North Vietnamese” at the Battle, while the enemy force at Long Tân was almost solely “Viet Cong,” the 3rd Battalion/275th VC Main Force Regiment was originally the D605 NVA Battalion (of the Bắc Sơn Regiment). This battalion infiltrated into the South in late 1965 (about 2,000 km/112 days) and was incorporated into the 275th VC Regiment in April 1966 following the 275th Regiment’s earlier heavy losses in attacks on Vỏ Đắt and Vỏ Su posts in Bình Tuy Province.

In summary, I have assessed the VC troop strength at the Battle of Long Tân as numbering about 1,750 and believe that 210 were killed on the battlefield.

Detail is included in Chamberlain, E.P., The Viet Cong 275th Regiment, 2022 (220,500 words); and The Viet Cong D445 Battalion, Their Story and the Battle of Long Tân, 2016 (348,200 words) – and in several multi-page Research Notes.

Today’s smile come from my inbox

#1           A taxi passenger tapped the driver on the shoulder to ask him a question.
The driver screamed, lost control of the car, nearly hit a bus, went up on the footpath, and stopped inches from a shop window.
For a second, everything was quiet in the cab. Then the driver said, “Look, mate, don’t ever do that again. You scared the living daylights out of me!”
The passenger apologized and said, “I didn’t realize that a little tap would scare you so much.”
The driver replied, “Sorry, it’s not really your fault. Today is my first day as a cab driver — I’ve been driving a funeral van for the last 25 years.”

#2           A wife got so mad at her husband she packed his bags and told him to get out. As he walked to the door she yelled, “I hope you die a long, slow, painful death.”
He turned around and said, “So, you want me to stay?”

#3           Putin is held hostage by a terrorist. A Russian truckdriver stops at the back of a long queue on the motorway. He sees a policeman walking down the line of stopped cars to briefly talk to the drivers. As the policeman approaches the truck, the truckdriver rolls down his window and asks, “What’s going on?”
Policeman: “A terrorist is holding Putin hostage in a car. He’s demanding 10 million rubles, or he’ll douse Putin in petrol and set him on fire. So we’re asking drivers for donations.”
Driver: “Oh, ok. How much do people donate on average.”
Policeman: “About a gallon.”

#4           A New York attorney representing a wealthy art collector called his client and said to him, “Saul, I have some good news and I have some bad news.”
The art collector replied, “I’ve had an awful day; let’s hear the good news first.”
The attorney said, “Well, I met with your wife today, and she informed me that she invested $5,000 in two pictures that she thinks will bring a minimum of $15-20 million. I think she could be right.”
Saul replied enthusiastically, “Well done! My wife is a brilliant businesswoman! You’ve just made my day. Now I know I can handle the bad news. What is it?”
The attorney replied, “The pictures are of you with your secretary.”

#5           A man was driving down the road when a policeman stopped him. The officer looked in the back of the man’s truck and said, “Why are these penguins in your truck?”
The man replied, “These are my penguins. They belong to me.”
“You need to take them to the zoo,” the policeman said.
The next day, the officer saw the same guy driving down the road. He pulled him over again. He saw the penguins were still in the truck, but they were wearing sunglasses this time. “I thought I told you to take these penguins to the zoo!”, the officer said.
“I did,” the man replied. “And today I’m taking them to the beach.”

Dutton Warns Against Accepting Palestinians from Gaza Due to Security Risks

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton strongly opposes the idea of Australia accepting Palestinians from the Gaza war zone, citing significant national security concerns. Amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict, Dutton has raised alarm over the potential arrival of individuals with possible ties to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.

Dutton firmly stated, “I don’t think people should be coming in from that war zone at all at the moment. It’s not prudent to do so, and I think it puts our national security at risk.” He emphasized that bringing in people from a conflict area without thorough checks by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) could expose Australia to heightened risks.

He questioned the government’s approach, expressing disbelief that they would consider allowing individuals from such a volatile region without robust verification processes in place. “Hamas is a listed terrorist organization,” Dutton pointed out, “and they’ve just committed an atrocity against the Jewish people—the biggest attack on people of Jewish faith since the Holocaust.”

Highlighting the potential dangers, Dutton argued that even a small percentage of individuals with sympathies towards Hamas could pose a serious threat to Australia’s safety. “You bring 3,000 people in, let’s say 99 percent are good. If 1 percent, 30 people, are questionable or sympathisers with a listed terrorist organisation, how on earth is that in our country’s best interests?” he asked.

Dutton insisted that Australia should halt the intake of individuals from war zones until proper security checks are ensured, emphasizing that the current approach by the government is irresponsible and risks the nation’s security. He stressed the importance of conducting thorough checks, akin to those done in the past with extensive intelligence support, which he believes are lacking in the current situation.

Long Tan – Australia’s Vietnam Story

The Battle of Long Tan, fought on August 18, 1966, was a significant engagement during the Vietnam War, involving the Australian Army. It occurred in a rubber plantation near Long Tan, South Vietnam, and pitted 108 soldiers of Delta Company, 6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (6RAR), against a vastly superior force of Viet Cong and North Vietnamese troops, estimated at 2,000 to 2,500.

The battle began when Delta Company was ambushed while patrolling the plantation. Despite being outnumbered and surrounded, the Australians held their ground, relying on artillery support and their discipline. The weather added to the chaos, as torrential rain reduced visibility and made communication difficult.

The Australians suffered 18 dead and 24 wounded but managed to inflict heavy casualties on the enemy, with over 245 Viet Cong bodies found in the aftermath. The victory at Long Tan became a defining moment for Australia in the Vietnam War, symbolizing the bravery and resilience of its soldiers.

The battle is commemorated annually in Australia on Vietnam Veterans Day, serving as a reminder of the sacrifices made by those who served in the conflict and the harsh realities of war.

Taliban hold ‘humiliating’ parade three years after returning to power in Afghanistan

Taliban’s Parade Marks Anniversary of US Withdrawal

Three years after the chaotic withdrawal of American forces from Afghanistan, the Taliban marked the occasion with a grand parade at Bagram Airfield, a former US military base. The event featured Taliban soldiers marching with American-made machine guns and vehicles, including a vast array of military equipment estimated to be worth around $7 billion, left behind during the hasty US exit.

The parade, a stark display of the Taliban’s newfound power, saw pickup trucks filled with armed men driving through the streets of Kabul. Senior Taliban officials attended the celebration, though the group’s Supreme Leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, was notably absent.

 

The Controversial US Withdrawal

The Biden administration’s decision to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan in August 2021 faced intense global criticism. The rapid collapse of the Afghan government and the swift takeover by the Taliban sparked chaos and despair, leading to a hurried and dangerous evacuation. During the evacuation process, a suicide bombing at the Kabul airport claimed the lives of 183 people, including 13 US service members, adding to the tragedy.

The withdrawal also left behind hundreds of American citizens and thousands of Afghan allies, many of whom had supported US efforts during the 20-year conflict. The decision to withdraw under such circumstances continues to be a point of contention in the US and abroad.

Taliban’s Bold Claims of Governance

During the parade and subsequent speeches, Taliban leaders made bold claims regarding their governance and achievements over the past three years. They boasted of their success in strengthening Islamic law across Afghanistan and providing “peace and security” to the war-torn nation. Deputy Prime Minister Maulvi Abdul Kabir emphasized the Taliban’s commitment to unity and non-interference in Afghanistan’s internal affairs.

However, these claims have been met with skepticism and criticism. US Army veteran Bill Roggio, among others, dismissed the Taliban’s assertions as mere propaganda, highlighting the ongoing issues and hardships faced by the Afghan population under Taliban rule.

Afghanistan’s Struggles Under Taliban Rule

Despite the celebratory parade, Afghanistan remains in a dire state. Millions of people are teetering on the brink of starvation, with the country’s economy in shambles. Unemployment is rampant, and the Taliban’s oppressive policies, including banning girls and women from attending school beyond the sixth grade, have drawn widespread condemnation.

The Taliban’s primary focus appears to be on maintaining their control over the country and enforcing a strict interpretation of Sharia law, rather than addressing the humanitarian and economic crises plaguing Afghanistan. As the Taliban celebrates their hold on power, the future of Afghanistan remains uncertain, with its people bearing the brunt of the ongoing challenges.

 

AUKUS Partners Overhaul Defence Technology Sharing in Historic Move

Australia, the United States, and Britain have significantly reduced barriers to sharing defence technologies, marking a major advancement for the AUKUS alliance. This move accelerates the approval process for sensitive defence exports and supports Australia’s goal of acquiring nuclear-powered submarines.

The removal of red tape is also expected to speed up the development and production of advanced military technologies such as undersea drones, hypersonic missiles, and quantum technologies among the AUKUS partners. Despite being Australia’s closest military ally, the US had previously restricted the sharing of highly sensitive defence technology under the International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Starting next month, 70% of US defence exports to Australia that were previously governed by ITAR will be licence-free.

Defence Minister Richard Marles hailed the reforms as a major enhancement to Australia’s security, emphasizing that they will revolutionize defence trade, innovation, and cooperation at the pace and scale necessary to address current strategic challenges.

The historic AUKUS agreement, signed in March of last year, is divided into two pillars. Under the first pillar, Australia will invest up to $368 billion by 2055 to build a fleet of eight nuclear-propelled submarines in Adelaide, with the first entering service in the 2040s. The second pillar focuses on the sharing and development of advanced military technologies, including hypersonic missiles, undersea capabilities, and artificial intelligence, with an emphasis on countering Chinese assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region.

 

A duty to entertain: the musicians who serve in the Australian Army Band Corps

Making a living as a musician is no easy gig. It’s prompted some performers to turn to the defence force, for stability, and opportunity. Once they secure a competitive place in Australia’s army band, musicians must balance their craft with being a soldier.

CLICK LINK to view this article

A duty to entertain: the musicians who serve in the Australian Army Band Corps | Watch (msn.com)

79 years ago today, the Second World War ended

Today we commemorate Victory in The Pacific Day. 

Victory in the Pacific Day, observed on August 15th, is a solemn and significant occasion in Australia’s history, marking the end of World War II in the Pacific theatre. It was on this day, 79 years ago, that Prime Minister Ben Chifley made the historic announcement that the war had ended, bringing relief and a complex mix of emotions to a war-weary nation.

As Chifley addressed the Australian public, his words resonated deeply: “Let us remember those whose lives were given that we may enjoy this glorious moment and may look forward to a peace which they have won for us.” His message was a call to remember the sacrifices made by countless Australians in the pursuit of peace and freedom. It was a moment that underscored both the joy of victory and the heavy cost of war.

Across Australia, the news sparked spontaneous celebrations. In cities and towns, people flooded the streets, embracing, singing, and dancing, their exuberance a release after years of anxiety and hardship. Yet, for many others, especially those who had served in distant lands, the news was met with a quieter, more reflective response. The war had changed them, and the transition back to civilian life seemed daunting.

Sergeant Thomas Arthur Guy Hungerford, a member of the 2/8 Cavalry Commando Squadron, was stationed in Bougainville when Japan surrendered. His reaction captures the uncertainty faced by many returning soldiers. “Suddenly we were unemployed,” he recalled. “We had to begin thinking about returning to civvy life, and I don’t think there were many who had a very clear idea of what that meant. I know I didn’t.”

The impact of World War II on Australia was profound. Almost one million Australians served, with more than 39,000 losing their lives, and around 30,000 taken as prisoners of war. The scars of the conflict were both physical and emotional, leaving a lasting legacy on the nation.

Today, as we commemorate Victory in the Pacific Day, we pause to honour and remember all who served our nation during this defining chapter of history. We reflect on their bravery, their sacrifices, and the freedoms they secured for future generations. Their legacy is a reminder of the resilience and strength of the Australian spirit.

Lest we forget.