Washington Post-Lional Thorpe
WASHINGTON: The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, now stretching over two-and-a-half years, has provided military analysts and strategists with fresh insights into the changing face of large-scale combat. From the rapid deployment of unmanned systems to the increasingly critical role of electronic warfare (EW), the war has become a testing ground for new tactics and innovations.
At the recent Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA) conference, US military officials reflected on the lessons learned from Ukraine’s defence against Russia. As Andrew Evans, director of the Army’s Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Task Force, highlighted, “The best innovators are those who must innovate to survive.” The innovation seen on the battlefield in Ukraine is, according to Evans, nothing short of unprecedented.
One key lesson came from Ukraine’s naval strategy. Despite Russia’s overwhelming naval superiority on paper, Ukraine has managed to keep the Russian Black Sea Fleet in check through the use of unmanned surface vessels and land-based strikes. Vice Adm. Karl Thomas, Director of Naval Intelligence, noted that Ukraine’s use of Neptune cruise missiles, which led to the sinking of the Russian Moskva in 2022, was a pivotal moment. This success was followed by the adoption of unmanned systems that further complicated Russia’s naval operations. Thomas emphasized that smaller, more cost-effective unmanned systems could have a disproportionate impact on traditional naval forces.
In the air, the importance of commercial remote sensing was underscored by Maj. Gen. Gregory Gagnon of the Space Force. In the months leading up to the invasion, US officials used commercial satellite imagery to convince allies of Russia’s imminent plans, allowing for the early mobilization of diplomatic and military support. Gagnon pointed out that the ability to share unclassified imagery with the public was crucial in building international consensus and support for Ukraine.
Information warfare has also emerged as a dominant feature of the conflict. Brig. Gen. William Wilburn of the National Security Agency’s Cybersecurity Directorate described the “race to control the narrative” on social media as a critical aspect of modern warfare. Both sides have used this information space to amplify their messages, often deploying misinformation to influence public perception and international opinion. Wilburn remarked that this new form of information dominance will likely be a staple in future conflicts.
The conflict has also brought to light the effectiveness of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in combat. Evans noted that inexpensive drones are frequently able to neutralize much more expensive equipment, presenting a stark contrast in return on investment. This dynamic is pushing military planners to rethink how they procure and deploy weapons systems. At the same time, the need for adaptive electronic warfare strategies has become apparent. Evans warned that the US military has underinvested in EW, leaving a gap in both defensive and offensive capabilities. The ability to rapidly reprogram EW systems to counter enemy tactics will be essential in future engagements.
As the war in Ukraine continues to unfold, it serves as a live case study in the evolution of modern warfare. The lessons learned from this conflict will shape how future wars are fought, with an emphasis on unmanned systems, electronic warfare, and the battle for information control.