All News

In an unprecedented move, Israel’s Foreign Minister, Israel Katz, has urged NATO to expel Turkey from the alliance following recent threats from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Katz’s call to action has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles, as the volatile situation between Israel and Turkey reaches a boiling point.

Katz has wasted no time in rallying international support, instructing Israeli diplomats to urgently engage with NATO members. His demands for Turkey’s condemnation and expulsion come in response to Erdoğan’s recent aggressive rhetoric and threats. “Turkey’s actions and words are unacceptable and threaten regional stability,” Katz said in a press statement. “NATO must take a stand and show that such behaviour will not be tolerated.”

The latest bout of tension was sparked by Erdoğan’s incendiary comments threatening to deploy Turkish military personnel to Gaza. The Turkish president claimed this would demonstrate strength and deter Israeli actions in the region. His statements have ignited fears of a broader regional conflict, drawing widespread condemnation from various international quarters.

Prominent global leaders have voiced their concerns about the escalating situation. Geert Wilders, a well-known and controversial figure in the Dutch House of Representatives, did not mince words, calling Erdoğan an “Islamofascist” and “totally nuts.” Wilders, who has a history of advocating for Turkey’s expulsion from NATO, seized the opportunity to reinforce his stance.

NATO, however, finds itself in a complex predicament. Turkey, a member since 1952, boasts the alliance’s second-largest army, making its expulsion a complicated and unprecedented move. NATO currently lacks a specific mechanism to suspend or expel a member, a fact reiterated by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in 2021 when he stated that creating such a mechanism “would never happen.”

Despite the gravity of Israel’s request, NATO’s leadership has remained tight-lipped, offering no immediate response to Katz’s demands. Analysts suggest that any move to expel Turkey could destabilize the alliance and significantly alter the geopolitical landscape of the region.

As tensions between Israel and Turkey continue to mount, the international community watches closely. The situation underscores the delicate balance NATO must maintain among its diverse members, each with its own strategic interests and regional challenges. Israel’s call for action, coupled with Erdoğan’s inflammatory rhetoric, highlights the fragile nature of international alliances and the ever-present risk of conflict in a volatile world.

For now, the world waits to see how NATO will navigate this diplomatic crisis, balancing the principles of the alliance with the pressing need to maintain regional peace and stability.

Newsline – Sarah Whitten

Twelve children died when a rocket, allegedly fired by Hezbollah, hit a soccer field in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights on July 27. Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Lebanese group designated as a terrorist organization by Australia and the U.S., has escalated tensions in the region.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in a joint statement with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and New Zealand President Christopher Luxon, warned of the risks of escalating hostilities. He emphasized the threat posed by Iranian-backed groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, calling for a ceasefire and peace negotiations.

The U.S. attributed the attack to Hezbollah and condemned it, reinforcing their support for Israel. Efforts are being made for a diplomatic solution along the “Blue Line” to ensure safety for civilians on both sides.

Liberal Senator Dave Sharma expressed sorrow over the loss of life and condemned Hezbollah’s continuous attacks on Israeli civilians. The prime ministers’ joint statement also condemned Iran’s actions and urged for an end to the violence, highlighting the risk to thousands of civilians in Lebanon and Israel.

Ipsos Summery

A new survey reveals that a growing number of Australians believe the shift to renewable energy is negatively affecting energy prices in the country. Ipsos, a global market research firm, has released a report offering insights into Australians’ views on the government’s and political parties’ push for an energy transition.

The survey found that 41 percent of respondents are worried about the transition’s impact on living costs, marking a 10 percent increase since 2022. Additionally, 37 percent and 36 percent of respondents feel the transition is detrimental to the affordability of household energy bills and the reliability of energy supply, up by 7 percent and 11 percent, respectively.

Moreover, the percentage of Australians who want the transition to focus on reducing energy prices and enhancing network reliability has surged by 13 percent compared to the previous survey. There has also been a decline in support for Australia taking a leading role in the energy transition, with only 58 percent of respondents now in favor, down from 64 percent in 2022.

“The current cost-of-living environment is prompting many Australians to reassess the financial impact of the energy transition on their households,” said Stuart Clark, Ipsos Australia’s Public Affairs Director. “This is dampening enthusiasm for Australia to lead the global transition.”

These concerns come amid a notable rise in electricity prices in recent years. Data from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission shows that effective prices for residential customers increased by 14 percent between September 2022 and September 2023, following a 13.1 percent rise between September 2021 and September 2022.

For instance, over two-thirds of respondents believe the transition could lead to higher household energy prices, while 58 percent think electric cars are as harmful to the environment as petrol cars. Additionally, half of the respondents feel that building more solar and wind farms is encroaching on valuable agricultural land, and more renewable energy projects could lead to increased blackouts and brownouts.

Sky News

Earlier this week, the Ministry for Defence confirmed that a decision regarding the fate of those accused of war crimes in Afghanistan would be made “before the election” and “soon.” Although the date for the next federal election remains unconfirmed, it is anticipated to occur before May of next year.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles affirmed that a decision on whether to strip medals from Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel would be made prior to the upcoming election. This announcement follows the 2020 Brereton inquiry’s findings, which investigated alleged war crimes committed by ADF members during the Afghanistan war between 2005 and 2016.

Former Chief of the ADF, Angus Campbell, had previously informed current and former ADF members that honours for distinguished and conspicuous service in warlike operations might be rescinded.

“I will be making the decision before the election; I can tell you that. I’ll be making that decision soon,” Deputy PM Marles stated in an interview with Sky News on July 28.

He clarified, “Just to be clear, this is a decision not in relation to the person (Ben Roberts-Smith) that you mentioned, but in relation to those who had command authority. That is a process that I’ve wanted to go through thoroughly to make sure that we get the answers to this right.”

Marles emphasized the thoroughness of the review process, saying, “It is one that has been on my desk and we’ve been going through in an enormous amount of detail, but it won’t be long before we are able to make those decisions and certainly, they’ll be made before the election.”

The United States’ shipbuilding capabilities are significantly behind those of China, highlighting the urgent need for the US Navy to bolster its preparations for a potential conflict in the Indo-Pacific region. This warning was issued by a senior State Department official during a congressional hearing today.

Kurt Campbell, Deputy Secretary of State and former National Security Council senior official, addressed the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, emphasizing the critical gap in shipbuilding between the US and China. “The disparity in shipbuilding is alarming. We must improve in this area to maintain our status as a leading naval power in the 21st century,” Campbell stated.

Having played a key role in developing AUKUS during his tenure at the NSC, Campbell acknowledged the workforce challenges facing American industry and the complexities of collaborating with allies. He noted that the focus on ground forces over the past two decades, due to conflicts in the Middle East, was justified. However, he stressed that any future conflict in the Indo-Pacific would shift the emphasis back to the Navy and Air Force.

“It is now the time for the Navy and Air Force,” Campbell declared. “They must increase investment, innovate, and adopt a more daring approach. The Indo-Pacific demands the most advanced naval and long-range air capabilities the United States has ever required.”

During the same hearing, Campbell was questioned about China’s growing relationship with Russia. He echoed concerns from Pentagon officials regarding Chinese support for Russia in its ongoing war in Ukraine and assistance in accessing Arctic resources. However, Campbell urged lawmakers not to underestimate Russia’s role in this partnership, despite the perception that Moscow is becoming increasingly dependent on Beijing.

“China and Russia are vying for influence in North Korea. China is uneasy about some of Russia’s actions there,” he explained. “They are also competing in the Arctic. While this doesn’t signify a rift, it highlights the complex diplomacy at play among these nations.”

Admiral David Johnston’s First International Visit as Chief of the Defence Force

Chief of the Defence Force Admiral David Johnston AC RAN visited Fiji and Vanuatu from July 26 to 29. This marked his inaugural international trip in his new role, highlighting the significance the Defence Force places on relationships with Pacific partners.

“I was proud to visit two of our key Pacific partners for my first overseas visit as Chief of the Defence Force,” said Admiral Johnston. “I looked forward to engaging with leaders in Fiji and Vanuatu to discuss our strong bilateral relationships and deepen our cooperation.”

In Fiji, Admiral Johnston oversaw the formal handover of 14 Bushmaster Protected Mobility Vehicles purchased by the Fijian government and delivered by HMAS Choules in June. “Australian Bushmasters provide world-class protection and adaptability. They will support the development of Fiji’s peacekeeping capabilities and demonstrate our commitment to closer ties under the enhanced Vuvale partnership,” he said.

During his time in Vanuatu, Admiral Johnston participated in the commissioning ceremony of RVS Sokomanu, Vanuatu’s new landing craft. This vessel’s delivery underscored Australia’s dedication to enhancing Vanuatu’s sovereign humanitarian assistance and disaster relief capabilities.

“Australia and Vanuatu’s bilateral relationship is founded on our shared values and vision for a secure and prosperous Blue Pacific,” Admiral Johnston remarked. “We recognise the impact of natural disasters across the Pacific and are committed to working with Pacific partners to respond when disasters occur, build disaster resilience, and support communities in recovery. Australia continues to work with Pacific partners to maintain a peaceful, stable, and prosperous region.”

An artist’s rendering of IAI’s Wind Demon missile, unveiled at the Farnborough Air Show on July 23, 2024. (IAI)

FARNBOROUGH AIR SHOW 2024

Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) has introduced the Wind Demon, a new lightweight and cost-effective air-to-surface cruise missile designed to meet the increasing market demand for mass-attack capabilities.

Guy Bar Lev, Executive Vice President and General Manager of IAI’s Systems Missiles and Space Group, emphasized the significance of affordability in modern warfare. “We see a growing market demand for effective and affordable systems that will offer attacks in mass,” Bar Lev stated.

Describing the Wind Demon as a new generation missile, Bar Lev highlighted its advanced capabilities, which are a culmination of years of experience in missile and loitering munition development. The missile is intended to provide an accurate and economical response to the evolving nature of warfare.

The Wind Demon weighs 140 kilograms (308 pounds) and has a range exceeding 200 kilometres (124 miles). It can be launched from various aerial platforms, including helicopters and warplanes. The system is equipped with laser-homing seekers and electro-optics, enabling day or night operations, as well as automatic target recognition.

IAI also pointed out the missile’s enhanced connectivity features, which include real-time video transmission, person-in-the-loop control, and low altitude hold throughout the mission. Its selectable fast/slow/fast speed profile allows for rapid reactions and controlled slow approaches at critical points.

The missile’s warhead, weighing over 20 kilograms (44 pounds), is versatile and can be adapted for blast, fragmentation, and penetration effects. Despite being smaller than other notable Israeli missiles such as the Popeye and Gabriel systems, the Wind Demon stands out for its affordability and capability to be deployed in large numbers.

IAI underscored the importance of affordable mass munitions, referencing the current conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, which have demonstrated the necessity for large quantities of diverse munitions. The Wind Demon aims to offer a cost-effective solution to this need, capable of targeting air defence systems, radars, and moving targets on the ground.

In conclusion, the Wind Demon represents a significant advancement in affordable and effective air-to-surface cruise missile technology, promising to reshape the landscape of modern warfare with its mass deployment capabilities.

By David White –  Titular News

In the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, armed drones have become a significant force multiplier for Ukrainian forces, causing most Russian casualties. Unlike the Russians, who continue to rely on large bombs and missiles to target Ukrainian positions, the Ukrainians employ reusable quadcopters to devastating effect against Russian infantry.

These drones, often commercial DJI models modified to carry small explosive payloads equivalent to hand grenades, are used with lethal precision. Dropping explosives from above, these drones inflict fatal damage on Russian soldiers, who have become increasingly terrified of their presence. The mere sound of a DJI drone sends Russian troops scrambling for cover, knowing that evasion is their best chance of survival.

The small size of these quadcopters makes them difficult to shoot down, adding to their menace.

Veteran soldiers warn their comrades to remain vigilant for these drones and to seek immediate shelter if one is detected. These drones pose a threat not only to infantry but also to armoured vehicles, as they can drop explosives into open hatches or onto vulnerable engine compartments without risking the lives of their operators.

In response, Russia has deployed electronic jammers to disrupt the control signals between Ukrainian operators and their drones. However, the Ukrainians quickly adapted by equipping their drones with home-on-jammer capabilities and fire-and-forget technology, allowing drones to home in on targets even if the target moves, ensuring a lethal strike. The few tank crews that survive such attacks are left deeply traumatized.

The shift towards drones and missiles signifies a transformation in modern warfare, rendering large, expensive platforms like planes, tanks, and surface ships increasingly obsolete. Instead, the future of defence lies in the mass production of a diverse array of drones and missiles, with a focus on domestic manufacturing to ensure sustainability during extended conflicts or blockades.

In this new era, engineers are the vanguards of military strategy, while traditional air force generals and admirals, clinging to outdated paradigms, may hinder progress. The dominance of drones and missiles, potentially deployed in swarms, underscores the need for innovative and adaptive defence strategies.

A computer-generated rendering of the Australian-designed Landing Craft Light to be built by The Whiskey Project Group for the Royal Australian Navy. Credit: The Whiskey Project Group

Naval News – Ben Felton

Sydney-based The Whiskey Project Group will build two new Light Landing Craft, known officially as Landing Craft Lights (LCL), for the Royal Australian Navy (RAN).

The two craft, which will start construction next month in Yamba, south of Brisbane, will equip the RAN’s Pacific Support Vessel ADV Reliant from next year.

Reliant is formally based at HMAS Moreton in Brisbane, Queensland and regularly deploys to the South Pacific for regional presence, logistics support, and transport missions. In 2023, its combined crew of commercial seafarers from Teekay Shipping, as well as Australian Army and RAN personnel spent more than 200 days deployed to the region.

After acquiring it in 2022, the RAN quickly equipped ADV Reliant with two Landing Craft Vehicle and Personnel (LCVP) taken from reserve. These will be replaced by the two new Whiskey Project LCLs next year.

In total, the RAN has four LCVPS which were originally built in the 1990s for operations from the Navy’s now-retired amphibious ship HMAS Tobruk (L 50). They’ve also seen service from HMAS Choules (L 100).

While the order from The Whiskey Project Group won’t replace the remaining two LCVPs, the contractual way that they were ordered keeps the door open to that happening in the future.

Naval News understands that the new vessels were ordered through the first contract of a new panel set up by Australia’s Department of Defence called the Defence Marine Support Services Assurance Program (DMAP) Panel.

A panel is a group of companies selected by an Australian government entity, such as Defence, from which products or services can be acquired more directly and faster than through an open tender.

The new LCLs will be 15.4 metres long compared to 13.2 metres for the legacy LCVP. The LCL also has improved seakeeping and is also significantly faster than the LCVP, being capable of 26 knots in a fully loaded configuration. It can carry 4.5 tonnes of cargo, including a light vehicle, containerised stores or up to 30 personnel.

The LCL design is from The Whiskey Project Group’s proven ‘Pioneer’ family of multi-purpose utility craft which is in service with various Australian state government agencies.

The order for LCLs is separate from the Army’s much larger Landing Craft Medium program.

Lawrence Pickering

18/10/1942 – 19/11/2018

Pickering was awarded two Walkley Awards with The Canberra Times for his work, one in 1971 and a second the following year in 1972. Pickering went on to win the award a further two times, in 1973 with The National Times, and in 1974 with The Sydney Morning Herald.

ED: From my inbox

Many of us came from convict backgrounds, sent into exile for stealing a coat or a loaf of bread or a silver spoon.

Some came for murder and robbery or prostitution. Tough people.

Many came from China to work on the Gold Fields.

Some came from Italy to work on the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electricity scheme.

Some came from Hungary during the Revolution.

Some came from Vietnam during the Vietnam War.

But they came for a chance to work and start a new life.

And they worked hard!!

The Greeks, Poles, Ukrainians, Italians, Russians, Latvians, Dutch, Serbs and Irish, so many more that it would be impossible to name.

There were no hand-outs, no privileges offered.

These people were given a chance to start a new life, in Australia, to become Australians. And Australians they became.

They learned English and embraced our country while offering the gift of their food and culture and music.

We accepted that gift and sat together at the same table and laughed and drank their wine, ate their food, danced to their music and married and loved their people.

As they did us.

I have spoken with friends from Hungarian, Italian etc., backgrounds and while they embrace and celebrate their roots, they consider themselves Australian.

The common denominator with this terrible situation that we find ourselves in is that our current immigrant population do not want to embrace our culture but to destroy it.

They do not want to learn our language, but to annihilate it. They do not want to work but to get us to work for them.

When our feminists ignore the genital mutilation, oppression of women, rape of little children of both sexes, we have a problem.

When our Politicians condemn an elected member of the Dutch Parliament for coming to Australia to speak his views, we have a problem.

When Australians are callously murdered in cold blood by immigrants of any Nationality, Religion or Race and our Government offers sympathy to the family of the perpetrator of the crime before offering sympathy to the family of the victim, then we have a problem.

When Australians are living below the poverty line and have nowhere to live while immigrants of any Nationality, Religion or Race are prioritised, then we have a problem.

When 16,000 English-speaking skilled-professional workers are refused visas and 12,000 uneducated, non-English speaking refugees are accepted, then guess what, we have a problem!

When Australians are called racists and bigots for speaking out about their concerns about the above, then again, we as a Nation have a problem.

When people prefer to debate the best bachelor or best contestant on X Factor to debating our Nation’s future, our children’s future and our grandchildren’s future, well you got it, we have a problem.

When our news is censored and we have to delve in to the internet to find out what is happening in the world and in our own country, dare I say, we have a problem.

The one thing that sets Australia apart from almost any other Nation on Earth is the Aussie spirit. It can be seen as a ‘she’ll be right mate’ attitude that suggests apathy; or ‘she’ll be right mate’ because we will take care of it.

I went and saw “Bridge of Lies” yesterday and it is well worth the watch.

The Berlin Wall was put up to separate two different Political views. It was a physical wall.

Today, we have a wall being built in Australia. It is not made of bricks and mortar. It is made of censorship, Political Correctness and insidious manipulation through media control, Acts of Parliament and Social media trolls. There is no razor wire, no watch towers. Just the ability to call someone a racist.

I am reminded of the words in the old childhood saying: “Sticks and Stones may break my bones – but words will never hurt me.”

Well today, apparently words can hurt you, but only if you live on the side of the wall that our Government and Politicians have elected as the ‘right’ side of the wall.

No longer are people in Australia even able to scale a wall. Bullets are not needed. To shoot us down, all that is needed is to call us racists or bigots.

I am hoping that the Aussie ‘she’ll be right mate’ translates to ‘don’t worry, we will take care of it’ and rise up and say that this is our country.

Friends, this is not a Refugee crisis.  This is an Australia Crisis.

I fear that it will be too late if something does not happen while we still have enough Aussies left.