Pharmaceutical Benefits for Gold Card Veterans

Here is the list of Pharmacy Medications available to Gold Card Veterans – but when you visit you doctor, make sure you take the list with you as he / she may not be aware of all these medications being available to Veterans under the RPBS scheme; if you should have any problems ask your doctor to contact DVA Pharmacy approvals on 1800 522 580 for an authority.

Pharmacy Medication List
as of 01 January 2018

(The following is a list of products, that are available on a Doctors prescription, for Gold Card Repatriation Patients)

Skin Care:
Sorbolene and Glycerine Cream, Calmurid Cream, Pinetarsol Solution, Hamilton Skin Therapy Wash, QV Bath Oil,
QV Cream — (DVA Authority required)

Hair Care:
Sebitar Shampoo, Sebi Rinse Conditioner, Selsun Nizoral Shampoo — (DVA Authority required)

Sun Care:
15+ Cream, Lotion, and Solarstick, Ego Sun Sense 50+, Aquasun

Oral Hygiene:
Savacol Aquae Spray for Dry mouth

Allergies:
Telfast, Claratyne, Zyrtec, Phenergan, Drixine Nasal Spray, Beconase Nasal Spray, Rhinocort Nasal Spray, Sudafed, Demazin Tablets

Cough Mixtures:
Senagar & Ammonia, Durotuss

Fibre Supplements & Laxatives:
Nucolox, Normacol, Metamucil, Coloxyl with Senna, Senokot, Movicol powder sachets, Glycerine Suppositories

Dressings:
Micropore Tape, Cutilfilm Plus Waterproof Dressings, Melolin Dressings, Handy Bandages, Cotton Wool, Betadine, Antiseptic, Solugels, Barrier Creams, Disposable Gloves, Prantal Powder, Bactroban Cream or Ointment

Antifungal Agents:
Lamasil cream, Canesten cream, Loceryl Nail Paint, Hydrozole cream — (DVA Authority required)

Haemorroidal Treatments:
Proctocedyl Ointment — (DVA Authority required) Suppositories, Anusol

Ear Preparations:
Ear Clear for Wax, Waxsol, Ceromol Ear Drops

Eye Drops:
Ircal Eye Ointment, Refresh Tears Plus 15ml

Vitamins & Minerals:
Calcium sup Tablets, (Caltrate), Vitamin B1 (Betamin), Magnesium Tablets (Mag-MIn), Accomin Liquid Tonic, Oste Vit-D — (Vitamin D) — (DVA Authority required)
Multivitamins — (DVA Authority required)

Joint Pain & Arthritis:
Metsal Cream or Liniment, Arthro-Aid (Glucosamine) Osteomol 665 Paracetamol (replaces Panadol Osteo Tablets) Voltaren Emulgel — (DVA Authority required) Fish Oil Capsules 1000mg — (DVA Authority required)

Sexual Health:
Viagara, Cialis, Caverject

Pain:
Asprins – Cartia, Astrix Capsules, Cardiprin, Paracetamol, Ibuprofen, Panamax Co, Panadeine Forte

Weight Loss:
Optifast, Xenical

Various:
Nicorette Patches (Quit Smoking), Vermox, Imodium, Gastro-Stop, Ural Sachets (Urinary Alkalinizer)

*NOTE:
Always check with your GP, as this list changes from time to time. (You could have been paying full price for any of these items without realising you could have them on a prescription, thereby reaching the Safety Net sooner.  Once you reach the Safety Net your prescriptions are free.)

Some Pharmacies are charging discounted scripts.  Be aware; if you take the discounted price, you will reach the Safety Net much later.

Missile Strikes in Egypt’s Red Sea Towns Linked to Yemen.

A recent missile strike in the Red Sea town of Taba, Egypt, has been traced back to “the Red Sea area.” This lends credence to suspicions that Yemen might have been the launch point.

Speaking on the matter, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari stated, “In the last few hours, we’ve identified an aerial threat emanating from the Red Sea region. Our fighter jets were promptly dispatched to monitor the situation, and a full investigation is currently underway.” He further commented on the situation in Egypt, saying, “Based on our preliminary findings by Egypt, the missile that struck Taba is likely linked to this aerial threat. Israel is committed to bolstering its defences and will collaborate with Egypt and the US to reinforce security against such threats originating from the Red Sea region.”

Egyptian media outlets reported that the Taba missile strike resulted in six civilian injuries. Furthermore, another rocket attack was reported in the Egyptian town of Nuweiba, according to Reuters. The strategic positioning of Taba, which is adjacent to Eilat—a city recently hit by rockets from Gaza and Nuweiba, approximately 50 kilometres to the south, raises concerns regarding the extended range of these missile threats. Nuweiba’s location, notably distant from Gaza, suggests it’s unlikely that the missile came from Hamas’s known weaponry.

This alarming development follows closely on the heels of an incident the previous week. Houthi rebels in Yemen, believed to be backed by Iran, attempted to launch missile attacks against Israel using the Red Sea as a conduit. However, a coordinated defence response by the US and Saudi Arabia successfully intercepted and neutralized those missiles.

 

 

Military pedants have much on their plate.

THE Oxford Dictionary describes a pedant as “one who insists on strict adherence to formal rules”.

The ADF takes pedantry seriously, with formal officer training at command and staff colleges, and more informal discussions, most usually in sergeants’ messes during Friday happy hour drinks.

Since pedantry has enjoyed a resurgence in recent years, particularly among the Fort Zinderneuf senior command, such training may have lost its relevance.

The concurrent resurgence in military teetotalitarianism has forced senior NCO pedantry training to go clandestine.

CLICK LINK to continue reading

Military pedants have much on their plate | Australian Defence History, Policy and Veterans Issues (targetsdown.blogspot.com)

Halfhearted reaction by PM

In recent developments, South Israel experienced a tragic incident which has sparked international debate. This event, orchestrated by Hamas, has intensified the tensions between the militant group and the Israeli government. Some suggest that the motive behind such acts is to push Israel to the brink of war.

One of the most disturbing reports from this event is the account of a pregnant woman and her unborn child being brutally killed by beheading. These kinds of incidents provoke strong emotions globally and raise questions about humanity, politics, and the ethical considerations surrounding the conflict.

Globally, reactions to this event have varied. Some segments of the Australian left, as well as other international groups, appear to downplay or excuse the severity of the incident, while others condemn it vehemently. Such divergent reactions underscore the polarized views surrounding the Israel-Palestine issue.

Australian Prime Minister Albanese, known for his strong support of Palestine throughout his political career, has given what some describe as a lukewarm condemnation of the incident. His responses are closely watched and critiqued by both supporters and detractors. In the backdrop of these tensions, there are Australians facing economic hardships, and critics argue that domestic issues should be prioritized.

It’s also noteworthy that many world leaders have met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss this and other matters. However, PM Albanese’s interactions with Netanyahu seem limited. Leaders from Germany, Britain, the USA, France, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Italy, and Latvia, as well as representatives from the European Union, have reportedly met with Netanyahu. Yet, there’s no confirmed meeting between Albanese and the Israeli leader.

PM Albanese’s frequent international visits, often referred to with the moniker ‘AirBus ALBO’ by some, have raised eyebrows given the absence of a trip to Israel since his election. The reason for this remains a topic of speculation among political commentators.

In conclusion, the incident in South Israel and the ensuing global reactions serve as a grim reminder of the complexities of the Middle East conflict. With the world watching, leaders and nations grapple with their positions, trying to balance diplomacy with moral responsibility.

 

 

No Shit Sherlock.

They’re not happy in Gaza ..
They’re not happy in Egypt ..
They’re not happy in Libya ..
They’re not happy in Morocco ..
They’re not happy in Iran ..
They’re not happy in Iraq ..
They’re not happy in Yemen …
They’re not happy in Afghanistan …
They’re not happy in Pakistan ..
They’re not happy in Syria ..
They’re not happy in Lebanon ….

????

SO.. WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?

They’re happy in Australia & New Zealand ..
They’re happy in Canada ..
They’re happy in England, Scotland & Ireland ..
They’re happy in France ..
They’re happy in Italy ..
They’re happy in Germany ..
They’re happy in Sweden ..
They’re happy in the USA ..
They’re happy in Norway ..
They’re happy in Holland ..
They’re happy in Denmark ..
????

Basically, they’re happy in every country that is not Muslim and unhappy in every country that is!

AND WHO DO THEY BLAME?

Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN !

AND THEN- They want to change those countries to be like, THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!
Excuse me, but I can’t help wondering…
How frigging dumb can you get?
Everyone seems to be wondering why Muslim Terrorists are so quick to commit suicide so lets have a look at the evidence:

– No Christmas
– No television
– No nude women
– No football
– No pork chops
– No hot dogs
– No burgers
– No beer
– No bacon
– Rags for clothes
– Towels for hats
– Constant wailing from some bloke in a tower
– More than one wife
– More than one mother-in-law
– You can’t shave
– Your wife can’t shave
– You can’t wash off the smell of donkeys
– You cook over burning camel shit
– Your wife is picked by someone else for you
– and your wife smells worse than your donkey
– Then they tell them that “when they die, it all gets better”???

Well, No Sh1t Sherlock!….
It’s not like it could get much worse!
Graeme Edwards

A postscript to 5RAR’s 1969 Battle of Binh Ba

By Ernie Chamberlain

“Australian official history accounts of the Battle of Bình Ba in early June 1969 omit that – apart from occupying the village of Binh Ba on Route 2 north of the 1 ATF Núi Đất base, the communist forces (ie 33rd NVA Regiment, D440 Local Force Battalion), planned to ambush the expected 1 ATF relief force as it moved north up Route 2 to Bình Ba.

According to a 33rd Regiment history monograph, the initial plan was for the “33rd Regiment to conduct an ambush battle on Australian forces lured north from their Núi Đất base – in the area of Route 2 from the Sông Cầu hamlet up to Đức Mỹ hamlet”.

Several Vietnamese accounts relate however that their planned ambush was not initiated ie: as the Australian relief force was “spread out in groups of two-and-three vehicles and did not fall into the Regiment’s ambush – so the (33rd NVA) Regiment’s tactical headquarters decided not to attack.” … and: “At 6am on 6 June 1969 – just as we had planned, the Australian forces from Núi Đất sent their tanks north to relieve Bình Ba. However, as the enemy was spread out in groups of two-and-three vehicles, and did not fall into the Regiment’s ambush formation, the headquarters of the Regiment decided not to initiate the ambush attack.” And: ““the Australians did not enter our ambush formation as planned.”
During a briefing at the 33rd NVA Regiment’s 50th Anniversary reunion in Hanoi in 2019, the Battle of Bình Ba was depicted on a “mounted” marked map – that also noted the site of the “un-initiated/”unsprung” Route 2 ambush.

A few years ago, I acquired a colour photograph of a 33rd NVA Regiment veteran – Hoàng Đình Chiến, giving a briefing off that map to fellow NVA veterans in Hanoi on the 33rd Regiment’s special ambush planned to destroy 5RAR south of Bình Ba. Chiến was purportedly the last living of the NVA combatants at that Battle.”

Regards, Ernie

[email protected]

The Battle at Binh Ba – 1969

The Battle of Binh Ba was a pivotal engagement involving Australian troops during the Vietnam War. Prior to this conflict, the 1st Australian Task Force (1ATF) primarily engaged in combat in open fields or dense jungles. The clash at Binh Ba, located in Phuoc Tuy Province, South Vietnam, was against a formidable and well-equipped communist force.

In the initial days of June 1969, the 6th Battalion, the Royal Australian Regiment/New Zealand (ANZAC), newly stationed north of the 1ATF base at Nui Dat for Operation Lavarack, began facing significant numbers of North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and Viet Cong (VC) soldiers. This led to several intense firefights. By the evening of June 5, 1969, Binh Ba village was taken over by a combined communist force comprising determined and well-equipped troops.

On the morning of June 6th, a rocket-propelled grenade struck an Australian Centurion tank passing north of the village around 8 am, causing damage and injuring at least one crew member. By 10:30 am, the 1ATF initiated Operation Hammer, deploying a reduced company of 5RAR, backed by armored units and artillery, to the village. Over the next 48 hours, intense urban warfare ensued as Australian forces sought to evict the NVA and VC troops from Binh Ba.

The Aftermath: When the 1st Australian Civil Affairs Unit (1ACAU) entered Binh Ba on June 8, they were confronted with widespread destruction. One-fifth of the residences were completely ruined, and the rest bore varying damage levels. The 1ACAU was instrumental in distributing essential supplies like food and water to the locals. Additionally, they spearheaded the village’s repair and rebuilding. The bulk of this reconstruction work, carried out mainly by Australian engineers, spanned a month. Notably, B Squadron, 1 Armoured Regiment took the initiative to reconstruct and reopen the village school by November.

The cost of Operation Hammer for the Australians was the tragic loss of one soldier and ten injuries. In contrast, the NVA and Viet Cong suffered significantly with 99 fatalities, a majority from the 33 NVA Regiment. Post-Operation Hammer, Australian forces, who had previously faced security threats in Binh Ba, could now traverse the village without hindrance. Their rebuilding efforts garnered appreciation from numerous villagers.

Operation Lavarack wrapped up by June 30, 1969. The 6RAR/NZ, during this operation, neutralized 102 enemy combatants. The Australian and New Zealand forces saw casualties of one and two soldiers respectively, with 29 injured.

Australia’s Quest to Ease Nuclear Submarine Fears

Picture: Russell Groth CPO

Australia’s journey to introduce nuclear-powered submarines has reignited decades-long concerns over nuclear weapons and associated technologies. The Australian Submarine Agency (ASA) is proactively addressing these concerns with engaging informational campaigns. A recently released “Introduction to Nuclear-Powered Submarines” video as part of Nuclear Science Week highlighted the advantages and safety of these submarines.

Established earlier this year, ASA is responsible for the acquisition and governance of Australia’s nuclear-powered submarine capability, facilitated by the AUKUS partnership involving the UK and the US. This trilateral agreement reinforces the narrative that the Indo-Pacific has become a strategic hotspot, and nuclear submarines will offer Australia a competitive edge.

Australia’s submarine transition aligns with increasing geo-political tensions, especially in the South China Sea. As part of this change, Australia will receive the first SSN-AUKUS from the UK in the late 2030s, followed by domestically built versions in the 2040s. Additionally, a deal for the US to sell nuclear-powered Virginia Class submarines to Australia is in the pipeline.

Why the move to nuclear? The ASA highlights several advantages: nuclear-powered submarines do not need frequent recharges like their diesel counterparts, boast unlimited range and faster speeds, and derive energy from controlled nuclear fission reactions. These submarines also emphasize safety with four layers of protection, and the radiation exposure to crews is minimal – less than that of long-haul pilots.

Despite the ASA’s confidence, a generational aversion to nuclear power stemming from the Cold War era and opposition to domestic nuclear energy projects remain. Recent polls indicate a dip in the number of Australians “strongly” supporting the nuclear submarine acquisition. While some believe the submarines will boost regional stability, others are unsure or believe they could raise military tensions.

The historical anti-nuclear sentiment, influenced by concerns over nuclear energy production and weapons testing, might be a challenge. However, with global nuclear advancements, it’s hoped that public trust in nuclear technology will grow as Australia progresses with its submarine program.

ADF Recruiting Shortfall

ED: From my inbox.

Dear Andrew Hastie,

I watched your segment on the Bolt Report where you discussed the possible causes for the major shortfall to recruiting targets.

What was missing from your argument, whether inadvertently or deliberately was the “Wokeness” direction in which our military is being driven.

You did allude to the fact that recruits might be too far from home and thus disinclined to join.

You didn’t mention the progressive reduction in entry standards applied to new recruits especially women, nor the disparity in the qualifying period.

You didn’t address the pursuit of the LGBTIA agenda (fingernails, high heeled shoes and rainbow military badges) that seem to take centre stage.

You didn’t mention the requirement for a significant proportion of ADF food to be “Halal” certified to comply with and appease a minority group.

You didn’t talk to the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion quota being imposed at the expense of the Masculine Anglo-Saxon majority from which you historically recruited.

But worst of all you didn’t refute the current Tall Poppy syndrome that seeks to denigrate the very essence for which the ADF once stood.

To the contrary you failed to stand up for the courageous men like Ben Robert Smith and Heston Russell and many others who put their lives on the line for Australia.

Instead, you allowed the court of public opinion lead by the MSM to smear them.

Instead of obfuscating Andrew – Address the real issues – lest you be remembered as the unworthy successor to Stephen Smith who started the ADF demise.

ED: Feel free to add your comments.