Australia Prepares for MQ-28 Ghost Bat Weapons Test

Media Release

AVALON AIR SHOW — Australia is set to conduct its first live weapon test from the MQ-28 Ghost Bat drone before the end of the year. This marks a significant milestone for the Australian-designed and built unmanned aircraft, which has been in development for several years.

The upcoming test will focus on an air-to-air weapon, with future trials expected to explore air-to-ground capabilities. The Ghost Bat program has gained international attention, particularly from the United States, which signed a data-sharing agreement with Australia in 2023. At least one Ghost Bat has been observed operating in the US.

Boeing has announced that the MQ-28 recently completed its 100th test flight, demonstrating progress in the program. Currently, eight Block 1 Ghost Bats are undergoing flight tests, while two Block 2 aircraft are in production. By the end of the year, 11 units are expected to be engaged in live testing.

The transition from Block 1 to Block 2 focuses on enhancing the drone’s survivability in contested environments. Key upgrades include improved navigation systems to prevent interference and structural modifications to facilitate maintenance and production efficiency.

Additionally, the MQ-28 is expected to participate in “operationally relevant missions” alongside the E-7 Wedgetail and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. These collaborations aim to refine the drone’s capabilities in a combat environment. Future demonstrations are also planned with platforms such as the F-15EX.

The Ghost Bat program is regarded as a potential boost for Australia’s defence industry, with aspirations for large-scale exports. With continued testing and development, it is expected to play a crucial role in modern aerial warfare strategies.

Photo: An MQ-28 Ghost Bat drone flies in tests for the Royal Australian Air Force. (Australian Department of Defence)

Protests Against Hamas Erupt in Gaza: A Sign of Change or Desperation?

Pulse of Israel blog

A growing number of protests are breaking out against Hamas in Gaza. This would have been unthinkable in the past, but with the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) steadily gaining control over the Gaza Strip and Hamas seemingly collapsing above ground, more and more “civilians” now feel safe enough to voice their dissent.

Many social media commentators are quick to claim that the people of Gaza have been unwilling victims of Hamas’ rule, largely controlled by fear. But is this the full story?

The reality is that protests against Hamas are not new. They have occurred periodically since Hamas violently ousted Fatah in 2006 after winning the Palestinian elections. During that takeover, Hamas terrorists threw Fatah members off buildings, engaged in gunfights, and expelled the faction’s leadership from Gaza.

Some argue that these latest protests indicate a shift in the attitudes of Gazans towards Israel. However, this is a misinterpretation. What these protests reveal is that when under pressure, the so-called civilians of Gaza will turn against Hamas—but only when they have no other choice. Notably, despite a $5 million reward offered for assistance in rescuing Israeli hostages, not a single Gazan has come forward to help the IDF. Those now protesting against Hamas would, under different circumstances, eagerly take part in another violent campaign against Jews.

As Hamas continues to collapse, there will be an increasing effort to portray the Gazan population as peaceful. But this ignores the fact that the overwhelming majority supported the October 7th attacks and are only speaking out now because they know they are losing.

True peace will only come when the Arabs of Gaza—many of whom trace their roots to Egypt—are resettled elsewhere, and the land is repopulated by Jews, who have an ancient historical connection to the region. Any other solution is based on delusion and is doomed to fail.

Our Services Guide is now available wherever you deal with DVA

25 March 2025

Hard copies of DVA’s Veteran Support and Services Guide are now available everywhere in Australia where you’ll physically engage with DVA. These include our Veterans Access Network offices, Veterans’ and Families’ Hubs’, Open Arms clinics, Services Australia shopfronts and Veteran Support Officers.

The 60-page booklet is a comprehensive guide to the wide variety of services and support we offer members of the Defence and veteran community, from the moment you join the ADF, during your transition and throughout civilian life.

The Guide can help you understand how DVA can assist you and your family to live well and age well, with information about how to access DVA services and support or how to find out more information. Whatever your circumstances, it helps to know the services and support available to you and your family that we provide.

DVA provides a range of transition services from education and training, assistance finding a job after leaving the military, to establishing social connections.

The publication of the guide reflects DVA’s commitment to improving the way we communicate with veterans and families.

This is the first edition of the Guide, which will be updated regularly with the latest information.

To download a digital copy of the Guide, head to the Services Guide page on the DVA website

Budget 2025-26 supports DVA to deliver services to the veteran community

The Australian Government handed down the 2025-26 Federal Budget on 25 March 2025.

The 2025–26 Budget builds on previous investments that have seen the demand for the Department’s services increase.

$47.6 million in 2025–26 has been provided to increase resourcing in key service delivery areas of the Department. This includes funding for up to 120 service delivery staff in the following areas:

  • the Veteran Access Network
  • Veteran Support Officers
  • Complex Case Management teams
  • Information Access teams, and
  • mental health support teams.

A further $11.9 million in 2025-26 has been provided to support continued access to key health and support programs for veterans and families, including:

  • extension of the Military and Veteran Psychiatry Training Program
  • extension of the Veterans’ Chaplaincy Pilot Program
  • supporting the delivery of the Veteran Employment Program
  • extension of the Veterans – volunteer training in suicide recognition and intervention program
  • supporting Invictus Australia
  • supporting Kookaburra Kids.

This additional funding builds on significant investments into the Department via the 2024–25 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) process, which included $34.9 million to provide DVA with additional resourcing as well as funding to support the Department’s implementation of the Government’s response to the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.

To find out more about the 2025–26 Budget measures, please visit the 2025–26 Budget page on the DVA website.

ED: This budget includes some positive steps in improving veteran services, particularly in mental health, case management, and employment support. However, will this funding be enough to address the backlog of claims and long wait times veterans currently face? Additional staff is welcome, but systemic issues within the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) require long-term structural reform, not just short-term budget increases. Veterans need streamlined, efficient services, not just more bureaucracy. Will these measures lead to tangible improvements for veterans, or are they just another

DVA Home Care and Community Nursing – Tweed & Gold Coast

If you live in the Tweed Heads or Gold Coast area and require high-quality home care, I strongly recommend reaching out to Stable Home Care. Founded by two of my grandchildren, Josh and Lachlan, both highly qualified and experienced nurses, the company is built on a foundation of professionalism, compassion, and excellence in care.

Their dedicated team of skilled nurses provides personalised home care services to support your needs, ensuring you or your loved ones receive the highest standard of assistance. Whether you are looking for a reliable provider or are dissatisfied with your current service, I encourage you to contact Stable Home Care and discover how they can make a difference in your life.

Cheers Ray

CLICK LINK

DVA Home Care and Community Nursing

DroneShield Reaffirms Strong Support for the ADF Drone Racing Team at Avalon Airshow 2025

Media Release – DroneShield

DroneShield, a global leader in counter-drone solutions, proudly reaffirms its support for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) Drone Racing Team at the upcoming Avalon Australian International Airshow 2025. This continued collaboration further strengthens the partnership between DroneShield and Australia’s foremost military drone operators, fostering innovation in both drone and counter-drone technologies.

Building on the successful engagement with the ADF Drone Racing Association, DroneShield’s sponsorship at Avalon 2025 will go beyond traditional support. This year, the focus will be on hands-on collaboration, with DroneShield drone pilots actively participating in the ADF Drone Racing Team’s activities at the Airshow. This initiative aims to enhance cross-domain expertise and drive innovation in real-time drone engagements.

“The ADF Drone Racing Team represents the pinnacle of high-performance drone operations, and we are excited to continue our support at Avalon 2025,” said Oleg Vornik, CEO and Managing Director of DroneShield. “This partnership is more than just sponsorship; it’s about shaping the future of drone warfare by merging expertise from both offensive and defensive drone technologies.”

Wing Commander Keirin Joyce, President of the ADF Drone Racing Association, welcomed the continued collaboration. “The partnership between the ADF Drone Racing Team and DroneShield is invaluable in pushing the boundaries of what drones can do – both in competition and on the battlefield. By testing cutting-edge counter-drone technologies against some of the most skilled drone operators in Defence, we create a unique development loop that strengthens Australia’s overall defence capabilities.”

The Avalon Australian International Airshow 2025 will provide a premier platform to showcase the latest advancements in drone and counter-drone technologies, further cementing Australia’s position as a leader in military drone innovation.

 

ADF Refocuses Language Training on Regional Partnerships

eWise Blog – Contributor

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) is shifting its approach to language training, prioritising cultural intelligence and strategic linguistic interoperability within the Indo-Pacific region. This transition moves away from an outdated focus on Middle Eastern languages, aligning training efforts with Australia’s evolving strategic interests.

A key step in this realignment is the introduction of Tok Pisin, the most widely spoken language in Papua New Guinea (PNG), into ADF language programs. With PNG’s close geographic proximity and historical ties to Australia, a structured defence treaty is long overdue. However, trust remains a complex issue shaped by colonial legacies, security interventions, and perceptions of ADF personnel. To foster genuine, sustainable partnerships, Australia must go beyond formal agreements and earn trust through cultural and linguistic engagement.

For years, ADF language training has prioritised Arabic, Urdu, Pashto, and Farsi—reflecting past operational commitments. With Australia’s focus now firmly on the Indo-Pacific, its military language training must follow suit. Resources are still allocated to European languages, despite English being the standard for NATO operations. Redirecting this focus to regional languages will improve operational effectiveness with minimal investment.

PNG presents unique linguistic challenges, with over 840 living languages. Tok Pisin, an English-based creole, is a practical choice due to its accessibility and broad use across military, governmental, and community contexts. Another strategic addition to ADF language training would be Bahasa, covering both its Malay and Indonesian variants. Though distinct, these forms remain mutually intelligible, facilitating communication with over 300 million people across Indonesia and Malaysia.

The success of Australia’s partnership with PNG will be determined by the strength of relationships built on the ground. To make this engagement meaningful, Australia must invest in language and cultural capability, ensuring ADF personnel can operate as trusted partners rather than external enforcers. Prioritising Tok Pisin and, where possible, Bahasa, will be a decisive step towards achieving this goal.

AGING

ED: These thoughts on aging comes to you from Ted Chitham

 

A distraught senior citizen phoned her doctor’s office. “Is it true,” she wanted to know, “that the medication you prescribed has to be taken for the rest of my life?” “‘Yes, I’m afraid so,”‘ the doctor told her. There was a moment of silence before the senior lady replied, “I’m wondering, then, just how serious is my condition because this prescription is marked ‘NO REPEATS’

 

An older gentleman was on the operating table awaiting surgery and he insisted that his son, a renowned surgeon, perform the operation. As he was about to get the anaesthesia, he asked to speak to his son. “Yes, Dad, what is it?” “Don’t be nervous, son; do your best, and just remember, if it doesn’t go well, if something happens to me, your mother is going to come and live with you and your wife….”

(I LOVE IT!)

 

Ageing: Eventually you will reach a point when you stop lying about your age and start bragging about it. This is so true. I love to hear them say “you don’t look that old.”

 

The older we get; the fewer things seem worth waiting in line for.

(Mostly because we forgot why we were waiting in line in the first place!!)

 

Some people try to turn back their odometers. Not me! I want people to know why I look this way. I’ve travelled a long way and some of the roads weren’t paved.

 

When you are dissatisfied and would like to go back to youth, think of Algebra.

 

One of the many things no one tells you about ageing is that it is such a nice change from being young.

 

Ah, being young is beautiful, but being old is comfortable.

 

First you forget names, then you forget faces. Then you forget to pull up your zipper… it’s worse when you forget to pull it down.

 

Now, if you feel this doesn’t apply to you … stick around awhile … it will!

 

Australia’s Budget Blowout: The Cost of Green Energy and Wasteful Spending

eWise Blog – Contributor

On Tuesday evening, Treasurer Jim Chalmers will deliver his fourth budget, an event that serves not only as an economic roadmap but also as a strategic launchpad for the Albanese government’s re-election campaign. However, as the government celebrates certain fiscal achievements, a closer look reveals a concerning trend: a return to deficits, ballooning public expenditure, and a continued waste of taxpayers’ money—particularly in the name of green energy.

A Return to Deficit Spending

Chalmers has benefited from a period of back-to-back surpluses, thanks largely to booming commodity prices and a strong labour market. Those days, however, appear to be over. The budget is set to confirm a return to deficit, with December’s mid-year update projecting a $26.9 billion shortfall in 2024-25, escalating to $46.9 billion in 2025-26. Despite Labor’s claims of reducing gross debt, federal borrowing will still amount to $940 billion in 2024-25—an astronomical figure that weighs heavily on future generations.

While the government has found $2.1 billion in savings, including $720 million from cutting back on consultants, these reductions pale in comparison to the reckless spending being poured into questionable projects.

The Hidden Costs of Green Energy Subsidies

One of the most significant drains on taxpayer funds is the continued subsidisation of wind and solar projects. Climate and Energy Minister Chris Bowen’s renewables push remains a financial black hole, with spending on wind and solar projects kept largely off-budget. While official figures acknowledge that at least $24 billion has been spent, the true costs are likely much higher and shrouded in secrecy.

Despite these massive investments, Australian households and businesses continue to struggle with soaring energy prices. In a pre-budget announcement, the government pledged a further $150 off energy bills from 1 July, extending last year’s $1.8 billion rebate scheme. However, this short-term relief does little to address the underlying problem: an unreliable and expensive electricity grid increasingly dependent on intermittent renewables.

Ballooning Government Expenditure

The Albanese government has also announced an $8.5 billion boost to Medicare, aiming for a bulk-billing rate of nine out of ten GP visits by 2030. While improving healthcare is commendable, history has shown that such broad commitments often lead to inefficiencies, cost blowouts, and a higher tax burden.

Similarly, Labor’s commitment to cap Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) medicine prices at $25 per script will cost an additional $689 million, with another $573 million earmarked for women’s health. Meanwhile, the defence budget has been adjusted, with $1 billion in military spending brought forward, part of a larger $50 billion defence strategy over the next decade.

Infrastructure spending continues unabated, with $7.2 billion committed to Queensland’s Bruce Highway upgrades, $2.4 billion allocated to saving South Australia’s Whyalla steelworks, and $125 million pledged for Melbourne intersection upgrades. While infrastructure investment is necessary, the commonwealth’s eagerness to fund these projects at a disproportionate rate compared to the states raises concerns about fiscal responsibility.

A Nation Held Hostage by Green Ideology

Beyond the official budget announcements, one of the most troubling aspects remains the unchecked cost of the renewables agenda. The push for a rapid transition to wind and solar has left taxpayers on the hook for billions, yet the federal government refuses to disclose the full economic impact of its policies. Australians are paying the price for an unreliable energy grid, increasing power bills, and continued dependence on government handouts to offset rising costs.

The Albanese government’s budget may be dressed up as fiscally responsible, but the reality is clear: reckless spending, a return to deficits, and an ideological obsession with green energy are placing an unsustainable burden on the nation’s finances. Without greater transparency and a more responsible fiscal approach, taxpayers will continue to foot the bill for the government’s costly ambitions.

 

Most May Not Know This, So I Will Try and Explain It the Best I Can

eNewsletter – David Belmont

Australia’s future has been shaped by a series of international agreements, many of which were signed without widespread public consultation. These agreements have had profound consequences on the nation’s manufacturing sector, agriculture, energy policies, and sovereignty. Understanding their impact is crucial to comprehending the broader economic and political landscape that Australia faces today.

The Lima Declaration (1975)

In 1975, the Australian Labor Party (ALP) government, led by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, signed the United Nations-inspired Lima Declaration. This agreement required Australia to reduce its manufacturing capabilities by approximately 30% while committing to import that same proportion from other preferred countries. The declaration was presented under the guise of creating a more balanced global economy, redistributing wealth, and providing all nations a “fair share” of industrial production.

Beyond manufacturing, the Lima Declaration also mandated that Australia import as much primary produce as possible, including essential food items such as meat and fruit. These obligations were agreed to without any public referendum or significant parliamentary debate. The economic ramifications were immediate and long-lasting, as Australian industries faced increasing competition from international markets while government policy actively discouraged domestic production.

Shortly after committing Australia to the Lima Declaration, Whitlam was dismissed by the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, on 11 November 1975. While his sacking was primarily due to a constitutional crisis over budget deadlock, the legacy of the Lima Declaration remains. The policies enshrined in this agreement are still felt today, as Australia continues to struggle with manufacturing decline and dependence on imports.

The Kyoto Protocol (2007) and the Paris Agreement (2016)

In 2007, newly elected Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd ratified the Kyoto Protocol immediately upon taking office. This agreement legally bound Australia to reduce its carbon emissions, imposing strict environmental regulations on businesses. While framed as an essential step in combating climate change, the agreement placed a heavy burden on Australian industries, forcing many to either shut down or outsource operations to countries with more lenient environmental policies.

Nine years later, in 2016, Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull signed Australia into the Paris Agreement, further tightening environmental restrictions. This agreement required even greater reductions in carbon emissions, directly impacting not just manufacturing but also agriculture, mining, and energy production. Australian businesses were forced to comply with increasingly stringent regulations, often at great economic cost, while major competitors such as China and India were given more flexible targets.

The consequences of these agreements have been profound. Australia, once a thriving manufacturing hub with a strong industrial base, has seen significant deindustrialisation. Energy prices have soared as traditional power sources were phased out in favour of renewable energy, often without adequate infrastructure in place to support the transition. While environmental concerns are legitimate, these policies have disproportionately harmed Australian businesses and workers.

The Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework (2022)

The trend of signing international agreements with far-reaching implications continued with the 2022 Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework. Under this agreement, signed by the current Labor Prime Minister, Australia has committed to locking up 30% of its land and water (commonly referred to as the 30×30 initiative). This commitment was made under the presidency of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), raising concerns about external influence over Australian land and resources.

The implications of this agreement are significant. By restricting access to vast portions of Australian territory, the government is further limiting opportunities for agriculture, mining, and infrastructure development. Given that Australia is already facing housing shortages, rising costs of living, and increasing dependence on foreign imports, the decision to impose further land-use restrictions raises questions about the government’s priorities.

The Role of the United Nations and Global Governance

A common thread among these agreements is their origin: all have been orchestrated by the United Nations (UN) or other international bodies. While these organisations promote their initiatives as efforts to foster global equality, the reality is that Australia has consistently sacrificed its own economic prosperity in the process.

By adhering to these agreements, successive Australian governments have prioritised globalist policies over national interests. Australian innovation, industry, and wealth are being systematically redirected to benefit other nations while local businesses struggle under heavy regulatory burdens. Meanwhile, the UN remains an unelected body with no direct accountability to the Australian electorate, yet it continues to exert significant influence over domestic policy decisions.

The Consequences for Australia’s Future

The cumulative impact of these agreements is clear: Australian self-sufficiency has been undermined, economic opportunities have been lost, and national sovereignty has been eroded. Manufacturing, once a pillar of the Australian economy, has been decimated. Agriculture, a sector vital to both the economy and food security, has been constrained by regulations and foreign competition. Energy policies have driven up costs, impacting both households and businesses.

Unless future governments take decisive action to reclaim national decision-making power, Australia will remain at the mercy of international agreements that prioritise global redistribution over domestic prosperity. The focus must shift towards rebuilding local industry, securing energy independence, and ensuring that future agreements serve Australian interests first and foremost.

Conclusion

The decisions made by Australian governments over the past five decades have placed the country on a trajectory of economic decline and external dependence. While global cooperation is essential, it should not come at the cost of national prosperity. Australians must remain vigilant, demand accountability from their leaders, and push for policies that prioritise the nation’s long-term interests over international obligations. Only through informed debate and strong leadership can Australia secure its future in an increasingly uncertain world.