All News

A seismic shift in public opinion has solidified January 26 as Australia’s national day, with a significant majority of Australians now voicing support for keeping the date unchanged. The latest Resolve Political Monitor data reveals that 61 per cent of Australians want to retain January 26 as Australia Day, a substantial increase from 47 per cent just two years ago. Simultaneously, support for moving the holiday has plummeted from 39 per cent in January 2023 to a mere 24 per cent.

The Voice Referendum and Changing Sentiments

The marked shift in sentiment coincides with the aftermath of the Voice to Parliament referendum, a polarising debate that appears to have reshaped national perspectives on Indigenous issues and broader questions of identity. The referendum’s decisive rejection underscored a growing resistance to policies perceived as granting undue entitlements to Indigenous Australians, reflecting a desire for a more unified national approach.

Many Australians are reconsidering long-standing narratives around Australia Day, viewing January 26 as a unifying occasion to celebrate the achievements and resilience of a modern, multicultural nation rather than a date defined solely by its colonial origins. While some Indigenous Australians and their supporters continue to argue that the date represents pain and dispossession, the broader public’s stance suggests a diminishing appetite for symbolic gestures that divide rather than unite.

Key Demographics Reveal Diverging Views

Support for Australia Day’s current date varies sharply by age and political affiliation. Younger Australians aged 18 to 34 remain the most hesitant, with only 35 per cent backing January 26. In contrast, 63 per cent of those aged 35-54 and an overwhelming 79 per cent of Australians over 55 support the date.

The divide is also evident along political lines. Among Coalition voters, a resounding 78 per cent support keeping January 26, compared to a slimmer majority of 51 per cent of Labor voters. These figures suggest that traditional values and national pride resonate more strongly with older and more conservative demographics, while younger Australians remain more open to reconsidering the date, albeit in declining numbers.

The Broader Implications

This trend signals a broader cultural shift, where Australians are increasingly skeptical of campaigns centered on historical grievances. Many argue that the focus should instead be on practical measures to improve the lives of Indigenous Australians, such as education, health, and economic opportunities, rather than symbolic actions like changing Australia Day.

The debate around Australia Day is emblematic of a wider move away from what some perceive as divisive identity politics. As Australia continues to grapple with its history, the growing support for January 26 reflects a public yearning for cohesion and pride in shared achievements.

A Turning Point for National Identity

As the nation approaches another Australia Day, the message from the public is clear: Australians overwhelmingly prefer to celebrate their national day on January 26. This date, while complex in its historical context, has become a cornerstone of national identity—a day to reflect, celebrate, and look forward as one people.

Rather than focusing on divisive debates, there is an opportunity to reframe the narrative of Australia Day, emphasizing unity and progress while acknowledging the past. With support for the date at a record high, Australia stands at a pivotal moment to strengthen its sense of national identity, ensuring that January 26 remains a day for all Australians.

In recent years, the United Kingdom has witnessed a surge in illegal immigration, with thousands of individuals arriving on its shores by small boats. This issue has raised significant concerns, particularly when analysing the demographics of those arriving. Alarmingly, the number of military-age males entering the country illegally appears to have surpassed the total strength of the British Army.

According to reports, the British Army’s strength currently stands at approximately 76,000 active personnel, a number that has been steadily declining due to budget cuts and recruitment challenges. In contrast, figures from the UK Home Office and border authorities indicate that tens of thousands of individuals, predominantly military-age men, have crossed the English Channel in small boats in the past few years.

For instance, in 2023 alone, over 45,000 illegal migrants arrived in the UK via small boats. While precise data on the demographics is scarce, estimates suggest that a significant majority are young men between the ages of 18 and 35—the same age bracket typically associated with military service.

The disproportionate presence of military-age males among the arrivals has sparked debates about national security and the potential risks associated with such an influx. Critics argue that this demographic could pose a security threat if proper vetting and integration measures are not implemented. While the majority of these individuals may be fleeing conflict or seeking better economic opportunities, the lack of adequate checks raises concerns about the possibility of criminal elements or extremist ideologies entering the country undetected.

Beyond security concerns, the sheer number of arrivals has placed immense pressure on the UK’s infrastructure and public services. Accommodation facilities are overwhelmed, with many migrants housed in hotels at significant taxpayer expense. Health services, education, and local authorities are also struggling to cope with the additional demand.

The UK government has implemented various measures to curb illegal immigration, including agreements with France to increase patrols and surveillance in the Channel, as well as proposals to deport illegal migrants to third countries like Rwanda. However, these measures have faced legal and logistical challenges, limiting their effectiveness.

Critics argue that the UK’s asylum system is being exploited and that a more robust approach is needed. This includes stricter border controls, expedited processing of asylum claims, and deportation of those whose claims are unfounded. Additionally, there have been calls for increased investment in the British Army to ensure national security and address recruitment shortfalls.

The comparison between the number of illegal arrivals and the size of the British Army highlights broader issues facing the UK, including declining military strength and challenges in immigration policy. It underscores the need for a comprehensive strategy to address illegal immigration while bolstering the nation’s defence capabilities.

As the debate continues, it is clear that the UK must strike a balance between providing refuge to those in genuine need and safeguarding its borders and national interests. Failure to address these challenges effectively could have long-term implications for the country’s security, economy, and social cohesion.

It is an extremely iconic building, known for its massive size, importance, and especially its shape. Have you ever wondered why it has 5 sides?

ED: This email from Tim Britten was in my in box this morning.

Good morning guys

I just wanted to draw your attention to the plight of law-abiding licenced gun owners of Western Australia.

By now many of you would be aware of the dictatorship that the West Australian community is living under after the landslide election win of the state Labor Party and almost complete destruction of

the state opposition.

Translation – WA Labor can do whatever they want when enforcing their over the top leftist green ideology.

How does this effect the ADF and its ability to recruit new Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen?

Current new laws in West Australia relating to the new Firearms Act is all but out lawing firearm ownership in this state. This has been done by making it so incredibly hard to own a firearm, to harvest your own meat or assist the state through destruction of feral animals. The new laws have been designed to make it so difficult that the average Firearm owner gives up and leaves the sport completely. (this is the exact plan of the current state labor government) in WA

Part of the new laws prohibit anyone under the age of 18 from firing a rifle even if they are under the supervision of a Licenced firearm owner. This means a father can no longer legally take his kids out and teach them to shoot.

The effect is the lack of ability for a father to instil in his sons and daughters the love of the outdoors the enjoyment of shooting and hunting and the skills of marksmanship, tracking, stalking and bushcraft.

Young men and women will now have to rely on “Call of duty” or other games on play station/X box to give them the idea that they may like a career in the defence force due to their love of the outdoors.

I proudly served in the ADF both as part of 1RAR and then also 11/28 RWAR over a 10-year period and I owe it all to the interest and love of the outdoors hunting and shooting instilled in me at an early age by my grandfather.

Labor both nationally and state have completely lost their way and are only interested in keeping the Left and woke or green portion of society happy. So, I call on all our members and readers to help by making their vote count when the time presents this year.

send the message through your vote to Labour that enough is enough.

Kind regards

Tim Britten

ED: This would be classed as a truism and because of that it’s worth a smile.

CLICK LINK

coyote (1)

20 January 2025

Veterans with service-related hearing loss and complex hearing needs will soon have improved, more timely access to hearing support through the new Veteran Hearing Services Framework.

This Framework will simplify the process for veterans to receive funding for appropriate hearing devices, ensuring fair and consistent decisions.

It will also make it easier for veterans to request hearing aids by helping them to better understand the services available and steps involved, resulting in a more positive, straightforward experience.

The Framework includes updated request forms to expedite complex hearing requests, updated internal DVA review processes, and enhanced resources and communication with veterans, families and service providers.

Each year, up to 10,000 veterans receive partially subsidised hearing devices through the Department of Health and Aged Care Hearing Services Program.

For further information on hearing services and the Framework, please visit www.dva.gov.au or email [email protected].

When Australian Lieutenant-General Sir John Monash was put in charge of almost all of the Australians in France in World War 1, he immediately set about to win a local victory at Le Hamel, but ended up helping all of the Allies win the war. This video goes into detail about Australia’s own John Monash, the architect who saved lives by developing tactics that are still followed today. Even British King George V honoured him for his efforts with a field knighthood, something that hadn’t happened in over 200 years up to that point. How did Monash do this? Watch the video and find out! Note to the viewer: In one part of the video, it’s mentioned that the Mark V tank is faster and the Whippet tank is mentioned right before this. I meant that the Mark V was faster than the Mark IV, not the Whippet tank. Just wanted you to know that in advance!

As the UK government considers its decision on purchasing new combat aircraft for the Royal Air Force, the debate intensifies over whether to prioritize Eurofighter Typhoon jets or F-35A Lightning II. Unite union urges the Ministry of Defence to choose Typhoon for national security and economic reasons, highlighting its versatility, proven performance, and role in preserving UK aerospace expertise. This decision is crucial for the future of the UK’s defence industry, which will support thousands of jobs and play a key role in upcoming fighter programs like Tempest. Discover why the Typhoon may be the better long-term investment for Britain’s airpower and industrial strength.

Australia is in the throes of a sharp increase in antisemitic incidents, with violent threats and attacks targeting Jewish communities in Sydney and Melbourne. Yet, the Albanese government’s response has been lethargic at best, exposing a troubling lack of urgency and support for the nation’s Jewish population and Israel.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has promised that legislation introducing criminal penalties for hate speech will be a top priority when parliament resumes next month. The proposed federal law would criminalise threats of violence against racial or religious groups, as well as those motivated by gender identity or sexual orientation. However, it stops short of addressing vilification and ridicule—a glaring omission that undermines its effectiveness.

Meanwhile, Israeli politicians and local Jewish leaders have criticised the Albanese government for policies they believe have fuelled antisemitism. Their concerns are not unwarranted. Despite the escalating threats, the government has adopted a wait-and-see approach, choosing to defer decisive action until parliament reconvenes. This delay signals a lack of political will to confront antisemitism head-on and protect a vulnerable community under siege.

Dreyfus’s proposed legislation is narrow in scope, addressing only threats of violence and omitting provisions against vilification. This omission leaves a gaping hole in the fight against hate speech. It is particularly concerning given that hate often starts with words before escalating to violence. Comprehensive laws are needed to prevent hate speech from taking root, not just to punish its most extreme manifestations.

Further complicating matters is the revelation that the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and ASIO are investigating whether overseas criminal groups or foreign governments have paid Australians to commit antisemitic attacks. This suggests a deeper, more coordinated effort to spread hatred and fear within Australian borders. Yet, the government’s response remains piecemeal and reactive.

At the state level, responses have been uneven. In New South Wales, Premier Chris Minns has proposed reforms to hate speech laws, including a specific criminal offence for vilification. While this is a step in the right direction, legal experts warn that such measures may be ineffective without robust enforcement mechanisms. The NSW Police recently arrested a man who allegedly attempted to burn down a synagogue in Newtown—a significant breakthrough—but they are still searching for a second suspect and investigating other incidents, including the firebombing of a childcare centre in Maroubra.

These state efforts, while commendable, highlight the absence of a coordinated national strategy. The lack of leadership from the federal government has left states to shoulder the burden of responding to a crisis that demands a unified approach.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government has been slow to act, and this inaction has been perceived as tacit complacency. Waiting for parliament to resume next month is simply not good enough. The Jewish community needs immediate reassurance that their safety is a national priority. Concrete actions, such as expedited legislation and increased funding for security measures, should have been announced weeks ago.

Israeli politicians have been vocal in their criticism, arguing that the Albanese government’s policies on Israel—including a perceived lack of support in international forums—have emboldened antisemitic sentiment. These claims, coupled with the surge in antisemitic incidents, demand a thorough reassessment of Australia’s stance on Israel and its implications for domestic harmony.

The Albanese government must act decisively to address the root causes of antisemitism and demonstrate unequivocal support for the Jewish community. This includes:

1. Expanding Hate Speech Laws: The proposed legislation must go beyond threats of violence to include provisions against vilification and ridicule.
2. Immediate Measures: The government should implement interim measures, such as increased police presence around Jewish institutions, while awaiting parliamentary approval of new laws.
3. National Coordination: A unified national strategy, developed in consultation with state governments and Jewish leaders, is essential to combat antisemitism effectively.
4. Support for Israel: Clear and consistent support for Israel would send a strong message against antisemitism and counter claims that Australia’s foreign policy fuels hatred.

Anything less is a dereliction of duty. The Albanese government must recognise that words and delays will not suffice. Leadership demands action, and Australia’s Jewish community deserves nothing less.

21 January 2025

The new year is the perfect time to get organised and take control of your DVA business. MyService provides a convenient way to manage your claims and access key services. 

Whether it’s lodging and tracking claims, applying for DVA-funded mental health treatments, or booking transport for medical appointments, MyService has you covered. You can also request a decision review, update your personal details, and access your digital Veteran Card MyService all in one place.

It’s still January, so why not make registering for MyService a new year’s resolution?

If you haven’t signed up yet, it’s quick and easy to get started. Watch our How to register with MyService instructional video for a step-by-step guide on how to register, and you’ll be set up in no time. Just like that, your resolution is ticked off!

Already registered?

Great! Take a moment to explore all the features MyService has to offer. You might discover tools and services you haven’t used before, like helpful tutorials or options to streamline your DVA interactions.

MyService has been designed with veterans in mind to save you time and effort. For a detailed overview of how MyService can support your DVA experience, including video tutorials and step-by-step instructions, visit the MyService page.