All News

The Krakow Post

Recent intelligence reveals that Hezbollah, the Iran-backed militant group, is actively regrouping despite suffering severe setbacks from Israeli military strikes. This development poses an ongoing threat to the United States and its allies in the region.

Israel’s sustained airstrikes have reportedly halved Hezbollah’s weapons stockpiles and inflicted thousands of fighter casualties. While these losses are substantial, they are far from crippling. Hezbollah has already ramped up recruitment efforts and is exploring ways to replenish its arsenal. Arms smuggling through Syria and covert domestic production appear central to its strategy.

Analysts suggest Hezbollah might be using the current ceasefire as an opportunity to rebuild and reorganize, a concern that highlights the fragility of the pause in hostilities.

The ceasefire agreement, ostensibly aimed at halting the conflict, prohibits Hezbollah from acquiring new weapons. However, enforcement remains inconsistent. Israel continues to strike Hezbollah targets, including rocket launch sites and supply routes, maintaining pressure on the group.

Hezbollah’s operations are deeply tied to broader regional dynamics. The United States has increased pressure on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to restrict Hezbollah’s activities. Washington has hinted at easing sanctions on Syria if Assad cooperates, but his regime remains a critical ally and conduit for Hezbollah’s operations.

This tangled web of alliances underscores the difficulty of curbing Hezbollah’s influence. Its ability to leverage Syrian territory for arms and fighter movements further complicates the security landscape in the Middle East.

Despite military setbacks, Hezbollah is focusing on rebuilding damaged areas in Lebanon, particularly in Beirut’s southern suburbs and southern Lebanon. These efforts aim to solidify its support base by providing social and economic aid.

Hezbollah’s leadership has shown no sign of wavering in its commitment to resist Israel. While weakened, the group’s rebuilding initiatives and enduring regional support suggest that it remains a potent force, one that Israel and its allies must continue to monitor closely.

The question remains: will this ceasefire pave the way for stability, or is it merely a prelude to the next round of conflict?

The steady decline of Australia’s armed forces is a stark indicator of a deeper national malaise: the erosion of the social contract between leadership and citizens. As the nation pivots toward an immigration-led economy, the impact on the defence force is both direct and devastating.

At its core, the armed forces rely on a robust sense of national identity, pride, and purpose to attract and retain recruits. But why would any young Australian feel compelled to defend a country that seems indifferent, if not hostile, to their future? The current reality speaks for itself:

• Living Standards in Decline: Young Australians are expected to endure subpar housing, poor pay, and outdated barracks while leadership obsesses over “woke” agendas rather than addressing practical issues. The basics of decent living adequate pay, quality education, and liveable accommodations are denied to those who might otherwise consider service. What incentive is there to defend a nation that fails to uphold these essentials?
• The Cult of Victimhood: The growing prevalence of “woke” ideology has fostered a culture where resilience and strength are undervalued. The emphasis on victimhood over accountability and perseverance is antithetical to the demands of military life. As a result, potential recruits are more likely to wilt under stress rather than rise to the challenges inherent in defending their country.
• Foreign Recruitment as a Band-Aid Solution: With a shortfall of 4,400 workers, the government’s response is to open recruitment to permanent residents and foreign nationals from countries like the U.S., U.K., and Canada, with plans to expand further. Defence Minister Richard Marles sees this as essential to addressing security challenges, but such a strategy risk undermining cohesion within the ranks.

What happens when geopolitical tensions arise, and foreign-born soldiers find their loyalties tested? The possibility of defections or internal discord is not far-fetched in scenarios involving conflicts with nations from which these recruits hail.

• Erosion of National Pride: The reliance on immigration to fill critical defence roles underscores a larger problem Australia’s failure to invest in its own people. Instead of fostering a sense of pride and duty among young Australians, the government is effectively outsourcing national defence. This move sends a clear message: the nation is unwilling to back its own citizens to take up the mantle of its defence.

A strong defence force cannot be built on empty rhetoric or outsourced loyalty. It requires a government that invests in its people, values their contributions, and ensures they have a stake in the country’s future. Sadly, the current trajectory is one of systemic neglect:

• The failure to address basic living standards for servicemen and women.
• The adoption of divisive ideologies that undermine unity and morale.
• The reliance on foreign nationals to fill critical defence gaps.

These trends do not inspire confidence in young Australians, nor do they fortify the nation’s defences. Instead, they reflect a leadership more focused on managing the symptoms of a broken system than addressing its root causes.

If Australia continues down this path, the consequences will be far-reaching. An army without loyalty, unity, and pride in its mission is no army at all. The defence force’s decline is symptomatic of a broader societal shift a move away from national cohesion and toward fractured, transient solutions.

The question remains: what kind of country are we building, and who will defend it when the time comes?

Retired RAAF Wing Commander, Bob Redman, talks us through some of No. 9 Squadron’s operations in Vietnam.

Two Australian army battalions have been reunited in Darwin. It comes as Australia’s Defence Force pivots towards the country’s north. The Seventh Battalion has been moved from Adelaide following a recommendation from the defence strategic review.

Recently, #garysinise was honoured to dedicate a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home to U.S. #Army #veteran Dennet Oregon who lost both legs below the knee in an IED explosion in Afghanistan. To find out more about the Gary Sinise Foundation’s programs for the severely wounded and its support to the military, veterans, first responders, their families and those in need, please visit www.garysinisefoundation.org

ED: Truly a thank you for your service

AUSA RELEASE

WASHINGTON: The US Army is advancing plans to develop a fifth variant of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), designed for autonomous launchers to target distances beyond 1,000 kilometres. This development was revealed by senior Army leaders during the Association of the US Army (AUSA) event.

Maj. Gen. Winston Brook, commanding general of the Fires Centre of Excellence, shared a slide at the event showcasing the proposed PrSM Increment 5 as a future capability. Meanwhile, Brig. Gen. Rory Crooks, director of the Long-Range Precision Fires Cross-Functional Team, elaborated on early efforts for the project, which is set to enter the science and technology development phase in fiscal year 2026.

Crooks emphasized that the envisioned missile would be designed to launch from an autonomous vehicle, potentially enabling greater range and payload. “If you’re familiar with an [M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System] MLRS pod, it’s about 13 feet long,” Crooks explained. “With an autonomous platform that eliminates the need for a cab, you could deploy something larger, extending range capabilities beyond what currently seems feasible.”

The PrSM Increment 5 concept remains in its preliminary stages, with no formal development timeline. Funding for science and technology exploration is in place, but a full-scale competitive process for its development is yet to be scheduled.

Evolving PrSM Capabilities

Over recent years, the Army has been enhancing its missile arsenal to replace the MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS). The PrSM family is designed for deployment from both the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) and the M270A2 MLRS.

Increment 1, now being fielded by Lockheed Martin, is capable of striking targets over 500 kilometres away. Future PrSM versions aim to broaden functionality, including:

• Increment 2: Featuring a multimode Land-Based Anti-Ship Missile (LBASM) seeker.
• Increment 3: Integrating enhanced lethality payloads.
• Increment 4: In development by teams from Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies-Northrop Grumman, aiming to double the current missile range to exceed 1,000 kilometres.

Enhanced Command and Control

To support these advancements, the Army is outfitting vehicles with large 24- to 32-inch displays for integrated battlefield awareness, offering manoeuvre forces a comprehensive operational picture by aggregating multiple data sources.

The potential for a long-range autonomous missile system marks a significant leap forward in precision strike capabilities, signalling the Army’s commitment to maintaining technological superiority on the modern battlefield.

Human evolution is still a puzzle, with new pieces constantly being uncovered to change what we thought we knew.

The latest discovery in China adds an exciting new chapter to the story.

CLICK LINK to read article

A New Human Species Discovered in China, Rewrites Evolution

ED: This article was in my inbox this morning, apparently it was posted on Facebook.

When we went back to the Battalion in 2015, it really struck me how the diggers’ perception of the unit was vastly different from ours.
The Army wasn’t just our job; it was our life.
The Battalion wasn’t just our unit; it was our home. The Company was our family, and the Platoon were like siblings you learned to live with every minute of every day.

The Battalion was our home. We knew every part of it. We either ran or marched across pretty much every inch of the unit—an area 500m x 400m housing 800 men at full strength.
Within 12 months of marching into the unit, you were pretty much known by everyone. There were no secrets.

Every unit had its own Other Ranks Mess (ORs Mess), where the soldiers and NCOs ate. The ORs Mess fed all personnel living in: breakfast, lunch, and dinner. In the early ’80s, the unit normally had 250–400 personnel living in the lines and eating at the Mess. Married soldiers lived in Married Quarters, and after 18 months, soldiers could be approved to live off base. Soldiers living out didn’t pay Rations and Quarters (R&Q) for their meals and accommodation, nor did married personnel. That meant they weren’t entitled to meals unless it was a range day or an exercise.

Of course, that didn’t stop those bastards from trying to sneak past the duty staff for a free feed.

In 2015, many of the guys from the ’80s went back to the Battalion for the 70th Birthday on 12 Oct 2015. What stood out after a decade of operational tempo was the change in the Unit.

Diggers no longer lived in Unit lines. If they lived in, which most did for 18 months, they stayed in Brigade Area Accommodation in single rooms. After 18 months, they received a Rental Allowance to move out and find a flat or house, alone or with other personnel. There were no Platoon lines as we knew them. Sections and platoons no longer lived on the same floor in the same barracks.

Now, let me be clear—this is not a conversation that starts with “In My Day.” This is an observation about one of the strengths of a unit in the 1980s.

We lived together as one extended, outcast family.
We slept in our lines.
We ate at the Mess.
We watched bands at the Boozer.
We watched Rugby Test Matches at the Boozer.
We watched movies at the Area Theatre or in a digger’s Jack Room.
We went for runs together after hours or hit the Gym to play squash or box. We played sports after hours on the unit sports fields or company parade grounds.
And if we went for a haircut or meal in town, we did it with a mate and caught up afterward with guys from our platoon, company, or battalion.

We had mates in other units from training or sport, but we were always 1 RAR diggers first. 1 RAR was our home and our family.

Our memories of service life are intertwined with the memories of mates and the experiences we shared while living on base. For soldiers who were never deployed, those memories are our strongest reminders of service life.

A somewhat disjointed family, sure but a family, nonetheless.

ED: Reflecting on Today: If we could go back to those days of shared living and close bonds, perhaps we might see fewer of the struggles’ soldiers face today, including the devastating toll of suicides. When your unit is your home, your company is your family, and your platoon is your brotherhood, the sense of belonging and purpose can anchor you through life’s toughest storms.

Defence Release

Ten brigade commanders, nine brigade regimental sergeant majors, hundreds of headquarters staff and countless deployments, activities and exercises enabled 6th Brigade to live up to its mantra ‘Enable the Force, Disable the Foe’ over the past 14 years.

Its proud and diverse history, however, pre-dates its re-raising in 2010, going back to the Gallipoli and Western Front campaigns of the First World War.

As Army reorganises its structures and fundamentally changes how it operates in order to enhance its contribution to the integrated force, 6th Brigade will once again be disestablished.

Regimental Sergeant Major of the re-raised 6th Brigade from 2010 to 2012, Warrant Officer Class One (retd) Ken Morris compiled a concise history of the brigade to help unify the 11 legacy units the brigade inherited when it was re-raised in Sydney on March 1, 2010.

At the time, 6th Brigade brought together Army’s combat support, intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance (ISTAR) units, which were geographically dispersed across Australia and in Malaysia:

•    1st Ground Liaison Group
•    1st Intelligence Battalion
•    2nd/30th Training Group
•    6th Engineer Support Regiment
•    7th Signal Regiment
•    16th Air Defence Regiment
•    19th Chief Engineer Works
•    20th Surveillance and Target Acquisition Regiment
•    51st Far North Queensland Regiment
•    The North-West Mobile Force
•    Pilbara Regiment.

“We were very busy and did a lot of travelling because the brigade was so dispersed,” Mr Morris said.

“One of our units was in Malaysia and we have a lot of real estate between the units across the north of Australia.

“Being a newly re-established brigade we thought some reach back to the history might help consolidate the units and bring together a sense of belonging as they were very different capabilities that had not previously worked together in the ISTAR realm.”

‘6th Brigade took part in some amazing actions in Bullecourt and Hamel.’

Mr Morris documented the brigade’s history from its formation in Victoria as part of Australia’s 2nd Division in February 1915.

Embarking for Egypt in May 1915, 6th Brigade landed at Gallipoli’s Anzac Cove four months later and found that the fighting was so exhausting and dangerous that their battalions had to be rotated on an almost daily basis.

After withdrawal from Gallipoli, 6th Brigade was forged into what many considered one of Australia’s finest fighting formations and became one of the first Australian formations to commence active operations on the Western Front.

In 1918, 6th Brigade fought in the pivotal battle of Hamel where Australian and American troops fought side by side for the first time. The synchronisation of the combat support forces with manoeuvre formations set new benchmarks for the delivery of battlefield effects.

“6th Brigade took part in some amazing actions in Bullecourt and Hamel,” Mr Morris said.

“By then they were certainly pretty good at what they did.”

The battle of Montbrehain in October 1918 marked the final achievement of the AIF in the First World War, in which four members of 6th Brigade were awarded a Victoria Cross:

•    Sergeant William Ruthven, VC
•    Private Robert Mactier, VC
•    Sergeant Albert David Lowerson, VC
•    Lieutenant George Ingram, VC, MM.

At the start of the Second World War, 6th Brigade, then part of Australia’s 4th Division, was sent to Darwin before being placed under the 3rd Division in New Guinea and then under the 5th Division in New Britain.

As the war in the Pacific wound down, 6th Brigade and a number of its units were disestablished in July 1945 before being re-raised in 1948 under the 3rd Division.

In 1960, when the Army briefly adopted the Pentropic divisional structure, all brigade formations were discontinued until being re-raised as ‘task forces’ in 1965.

In early 1982, 6th Task Force once again became 6th Brigade and in 1991, when the Ready Reserve Scheme was established, the brigade formed a combined arms element with full- and part-time members.

‘It was a long project that was only going to happen over a number of years.’

When the Ready Reserve Scheme was discontinued in 1996, 6th Brigade was once again disestablished and its units were brought under the command of other brigades.

Following a review of Army’s command and control structures in 2007, 6th Brigade was re-raised on March 1, 2010, bringing together the 11 ISTAR units.

“We had our own experience in deploying elements to Afghanistan,” Mr Morris said.

“There was always that tension between trying to form an identity and allowing units to do their thing, but it was starting to come together while I was RSM.

“It was a long project that was only going to happen over a number of years.”

In recent years, 6th Brigade continued to deliver specialist capabilities to integrated forces, including intelligence, electronic warfare, military policing, ground-based air defence, engineering design and force-level engineering.

The Brisbane-based brigade once again prepared to lower the flag, place its memorabilia in storage and commemorate its history at the annual Montbrehain dining-in night on November 20.

Guests included Chief of Army Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, former commanders and RSMs, including Mr Morris.

From early December, 6th Brigade’s seven units will transition to other brigades, and from mid-January 2025, Headquarters 6th Brigade will be disestablished.

1st Military Police Battalion (Brisbane), 6th Engineer Support Regiment (Ipswich), 12th Chief Engineer Works (Brisbane) and 19th Chief Engineer Works (Sydney) will transfer to 17th Sustainment Brigade, with its headquarters based in Sydney.

16th Regiment, Royal Australian Artillery (Adelaide), will transition to 10th Brigade, consolidating the integrated air and defence missile systems with new long-range fires capabilities.

As an interim measure, 1st Intelligence Battalion and 7th Signal Regiment will be employed as Direct Command Units of 1st (Australian) Division in 2025 before transferring to 10th Brigade to support the delivery of fires through a Land Targeting Enterprise, in addition to maintaining critical intelligence fusion, electronic warfare and signals intelligence capabilities.