INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR HEALTH

By: Arnaldo Liechtenstein, physician

Whenever I teach clinical medicine to students in the fourth year of medicine, I ask the following question:

What are the causes of mental confusion in the elderly?

Some offer: “Tumours in the head”. I answer: No!

Others suggest: “Early symptoms of Alzheimer’s”. I answer No!

With each rejection of their answers, their responses dry up.

And they are even more open-mouthed when I list the three most common causes:

– uncontrolled diabetes

– urinary infection

– dehydration

It may sound like a joke, but it isn’t. People over 60 generally stop feeling thirsty and consequently, stop drinking fluids.

When no one is around to remind them to drink fluids, they quickly dehydrate.

Dehydration is severe and affects the entire body It may cause abrupt mental confusion, a drop in blood pressure, increased heart palpitations, angina (chest pain), coma and even death.

*This habit of forgetting to drink fluids begins at age 60, when we have just over 50% of the water we should have in our bodies.

People over 60 have a lower water reserve.

This is part of the natural aging process.

But there are more complications. Although they are dehydrated, they don’t feel like drinking water, because their internal balance mechanisms don’t work very well.

People over 60 years old dehydrate easily, not only because they have a smaller water supply, but also, because they do not feel the lack of water in the body.

It’s important to drink several glasses of water daily.

Although people over 60 may look healthy, the performance of reactions and chemical functions can damage their entire body.

So here are two alerts:

1) *Get into the habit of drinking liquids*. Liquids include water, juices, teas, coconut water, milk, soups, and water-rich fruits, such as watermelon, melon, peaches and pineapple, orange and tangerine also work.

*The important thing is that every two hours, you must drink some liquid. Remember this! *

2) Alert for family members: constantly offer fluids to people over age 60.

At the same time, observe them.

If you realize that they are rejecting liquids and, from one day to the next, they are irritable, breathless or display a lack of attention,

these are almost certainly recurrent symptoms of dehydration.

Inspired to drink more water now.

 

 

Albanese’s Leadership and Broken Promises

Behind the News

Anthony Albanese entered the 2022 election with a vision of an idealistic, collaborative “new politics” that aimed to unify Australians, positioning Labor for an extended period in government. However, even then, some commentators questioned the viability of this vision, and reality has since proven far more challenging.

Today, Labor and the Liberals are neck-and-neck in the polls, with the prospect of a minority government, or worse, for Labor. Prominent figures like Gareth Evans and Bill Kelty, once key players in the Hawke/Keating era, have severely criticized Albanese’s leadership. So, how did it all go wrong?

Much of the blame lies in the unrealistic expectations that formed part of Labor’s 2022 election strategy. Albanese’s “new politics” agenda promised a collaborative approach, bringing together business, labor, Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. This approach helped counter Scott Morrison’s divisive, populist strategy. But while it worked during the campaign, it has been much harder to deliver in government, as three key failures demonstrate.

  1. Industrial Relations and Business Alienation

Albanese’s attempt to channel Bob Hawke’s strategy of uniting business and labor proved flawed. Unlike the Hawke government’s approach, which allowed businesses to offer lower wages while compensating workers with government-funded benefits, Albanese pledged to end wage stagnation and increase wages, especially for low-paid women workers. This move, although addressing deep-seated issues in enterprise bargaining, alienated key business groups. Criticism of Labor’s industrial relations reforms, including multi-employer bargaining and minimum wage increases, has been fierce, and the Liberals have aligned with business in opposition.

  1. The Voice Referendum Failure

Labor’s attempt to unite Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians through the Voice referendum ended in failure. Dutton and other populist figures ran a strong campaign, depicting the Voice as an elitist initiative that gave special privileges to Indigenous Australians at the expense of others. This narrative resonated with many voters, and Labor struggled to counter it. After the defeat, Albanese retreated further from his original commitments, abandoning key initiatives like the Makarrata Commission and LGBTQI+ protections, disappointing progressive supporters.

  1. International Affairs and Divisive Politics

The Albanese government’s efforts at fostering social cohesion have also been derailed by international events, particularly in the Middle East. Domestically, debate has become polarised, with Labor being attacked by the right for supposedly abandoning Israel, and by the left for being complicit in its alleged atrocities. This inability to maintain a coherent narrative has weakened the government’s position.

Narrative Failure and Leadership Criticism

As Labor’s vision of unity has faltered, so has its ability to craft a compelling narrative. Dutton’s simple and focused attacks have cut through, portraying Labor as weak and distracted by “woke” issues like the Voice, at the expense of tackling the cost-of-living crisis. His claims, while exaggerated, have gained traction.

Meanwhile, Albanese’s government has struggled to defend itself. It has pointed to relief measures like tax cuts, cheaper medicines, and reduced childcare costs. But inflation, high interest rates, and a housing crisis have largely overshadowed these efforts. Labor is also being squeezed between a hostile Coalition and Greens opposition, making it difficult to pass meaningful reforms.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has found it difficult to sell the government’s economic achievements, despite claiming that current spending has been necessary to stave off recession. The Reserve Bank has noted international factors driving inflation, but Labor remains the target of attacks accusing it of fuelling inflation through excessive spending.

Conclusion: The Failure of “New Politics”

Albanese promised a “new politics” that would unite Australians, but instead finds himself mired in divisive, populist battles that resemble the old politics he sought to transcend. Dutton’s portrayal of him as a weak leader, incapable of addressing the nation’s challenges, has stuck. This terrain, far from the idealistic vision Albanese presented, has left Labor struggling to deliver on its promises and maintain its grip on government.

 

Australia should be the richest nation on earth

Leith van Onselen

For a while, Australia was a great place to live and we had manufacturing, for example, as a substantial portion of the GDP of this country. We made cars, we made a bunch of different things. We had whole supply chains for various things. And then we just went into this path of just easy relentless growth where it was just house prices drifting up and shipping iron ore, coal, gas and gold overseas.

A Year Ago Today: The Hamas Cross-Border Raid that Ignited Conflict

A year ago, Hamas launched an unprecedented and brutal cross-border raid into southern Israel, leading to one of the most significant escalations in the region’s recent history. This highly coordinated and violent attack saw Hamas militants infiltrating Israel via tunnels, by land, and by sea, targeting both military and civilian areas. The atrocities committed, including the rape of young Israeli women, shocked the world due to their brutality and the scale of the assault. The raid left 1,700 dead and many more injured, leaving an indelible scar on Israeli society.

Israel’s response to such aggression, including its continuing efforts to locate and rescue hostages taken by Hamas, is rooted in the natural duty of any nation to protect its people and sovereignty. The nature of the attack, which deliberately targeted civilians and soldiers alike, violated international norms, and spurred Israel’s retaliatory measures. Many hostages have already been murdered in captivity, further intensifying the crisis.

Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization by many countries, including the United States and the European Union, aims to destabilize the region and eliminate the State of Israel. In light of such actions, Israel’s military response is seen as a defensive and necessary action to restore security and safeguard the lives of its citizens. The brutal nature of the attack left Israel with no choice but to respond forcefully to dismantle the threat posed by Hamas, while also working tirelessly to recover the prisoners still held in captivity.

This cycle of violence has placed Israel in a position where it must defend its population from future atrocities while also addressing the humanitarian crises that unfold from such prolonged conflicts. The ongoing efforts to locate hostages reflect the broader moral and ethical dimensions of this conflict, emphasizing the importance of human life amidst the horrors of war.

MEN ARE JUST HAPPY PEOPLE

This needs no explanation – and is a fun read, no matter your gender. Men Are Just Happier People! What do you expect from such simple creatures? Your last name stays put. The garage is all yours. Wedding plans take care of themselves. Chocolate is just another snack. You can never be pregnant. You can wear a white T-shirt to a water park. You can wear NO shirt to a water park.

Car mechanics tell you the truth. The world is your urinal. You never have to drive to another gas station restroom because this one is just too icky. You don’t have to stop and think of which way to turn a nut on a bolt. Wrinkles add character. Wedding dress – $5,000. Tux rental – $100. People never stare at your chest when you’re talking to them.

New shoes don’t cut, blister, or mangle your feet. One mood all the time. Phone conversations are over in 30 seconds flat. You know stuff about tanks. A five-day vacation requires only one suitcase. You can open all your own jars.

You get extra credit for the slightest act of thoughtfulness. If someone forgets to invite you, he or she can still be your friend. Your underwear is $8.95 for a three-pack. Two pairs of shoes are more than enough. You almost never have strap problems in public. You are unable to see wrinkles in your clothes.

Everything on your face stays its original colour. The same hairstyle lasts for years, maybe decades. You only have to shave your face and neck. You can play with toys all your life. One wallet and one pair of shoes – one colour for all seasons. You can wear shorts no matter how your legs look.

You can ‘do’ your nails with a pocketknife. You have freedom of choice concerning growing a moustache… You can do Christmas shopping for 25 relatives on December 24 in 25 minutes. No wonder men are happier!

NICKNAME · If Laura, Kate, and Sarah go out for lunch, they will call each other Laura, Kate and Sarah. If Mike, Dave and John go out, they will affectionately refer to each other as Fat Boy, Snow, and Macca.

EATING OUT · When the bill arrives, Mike, Dave and John will each throw in $20, even though it’s only for $32.50. None of them will have anything smaller and none will actually admit they want change back. When the girls get their bill, outcome the pocket calculators.

MONEY. A man will pay $2 for a $1 item he needs   A woman will pay $1 for a $2 item that she doesn’t need but it’s on sale.

BATHROOMS · A man has six items in his bathroom: toothbrush and toothpaste, shaving cream, razor, a bar of soap, and a towel   The average number of items in the typical woman’s bathroom is 337. A man would not be able to identify more than 20 of these items.

ARGUMENTS · A woman has the last word in any argument.   Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.

FUTURE · A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband   A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife.

MARRIAGE · A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn’t. A man marries a woman expecting that she won’t change, but she does.

DRESSING UP · A woman will dress up to go shopping, water the plants, empty the trash, answer the phone, read a book, and get the mail. · A man will dress up for weddings and funerals.

NATURAL · Men wake up as good-looking as they went to bed · Women somehow deteriorate during the night.

OFFSPRING · Ah, children. A woman knows all about her children. She knows about dentist appointments and romances, best friends, favourite foods, secret fears, and hopes and dreams. · A man is vaguely aware of some short people living in the house.

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY. A married man should forget his mistakes. There’s no use in two people remembering the same thing!

 

Royal Navy Submarine Service report uncovers misogyny, bullying and other unacceptable behaviours

Forces News – Navy

The head of the Royal Navy has apologised after an investigation found misogyny, bullying and other unacceptable behaviours had taken place in the Submarine Service.

The First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir Ben Key, said he had accepted all 37 recommendations of the investigation in full.

Adm Sir Ben apologised to the whistleblower who raised the alarm about alleged sexual harassment and abuse on board the UK’s submarines.

He ordered an internal inquiry into the claims made in a newspaper interview in October 2022 by Sophie Brook, a former naval officer, and other women about their treatment while serving in the elite Submarine Service.

Adm Sir Ben confirmed that misogyny, bullying and other unacceptable behaviours did happen and described it as intolerable.

He accepted all of the recommendations in the report including the formation of a new Head of Culture team and a review of submariner leadership training.

The First Sea Lord also commended the courage of Ms Brook in coming forward.

‘We must be better’

Adm Sir Ben said: “As the Head of the Royal Navy, today I also offer a public apology, both to Ms Brook and to any personnel – past or present – that have been subject to any form of unacceptable behaviour during their time in service.

“I am truly sorry.”

The Royal Navy chief alluded to how the service would go forward to improve the experiences of personnel in the Royal Navy while understanding “there is more to be done”.

He added: “Poor practices and behaviours in the past that may have been normalised in some quarters should never have been considered acceptable, and they have no place today.

“We must institute a culture that does not allow space for this behaviour to exist, and we must deal with perpetrators swiftly, without fear or favour, which I can confirm we have now done.

“Internal action has been taken against a number of individuals, up to and including discharge from the service.”

Adm Sir Ben concluded his statement by saying: “We must be better than this and do better than we have.”

The allegations

BFBS Forces News understands some of the allegations were reported to the MOD’s serious crime unit, but there was insufficient evidence to bring prosecutions. However, it is also understood that three people were discharged as a result of the investigation.

The investigation’s report has now been published, but much of it is heavily redacted.

The allegations included several reports of sexual misconduct, including the assault of a woman in her bed by a man of higher rank who tried to kiss her. She was then discouraged by the XO from reporting it.

Another of the allegations made was that a “crush depth rape list” is common across the service in which women and men are marked in the order they would be raped in a catastrophic event.

The specific allegation made to the investigation, their consideration of the evidence and their conclusion on the balance of probabilities were all redacted.

But the report does say the allegation led to several recommendations, one of them being administrative action as a result of the findings.

Another allegation was that bras were stolen from the laundry, leading to a recommendation that personnel be given the resources to wash their own underwear.

Telling the Truth about Pre-Contact Aboriginal Society

William D. Rubinstein – QUADRANT – Aug 29, 2024

” The total failure of pre-contact Aboriginal society to advance in nearly all significant areas of the economy and technology is indicative of what Aboriginal society was actually like. To put the matter bluntly, pre-contact Aboriginal society consisted of 65,000 years of murderous, barbaric.”

CLICK LINK to read the Quadrant article – 10min read

Telling the Truth about Pre-Contact Aboriginal Society – Quadrant

When Australians Completely Changed WW2 Without Realising

It’s August 1942. On the night of the 30th Japanese forces made their move on number 3 airstrip at Milne Bay. The heavy rain and muddy trails being the first enemy they faced. Defending the airstrip are the men of the 25th and 61st Battalions of the Australian 7th Infantry Brigade. A militia unit, with little training and even less combat experience.

Having never before experienced this style of combat, the inexperienced Australian units adapt quickly to jungle warfare. Developing genius, yet simple tactics that not only decimates the Japanese forces at Milne Bay but will become the catalyst of the tide finally turning against Japan in the Pacific War.

Why Changing Australian Place Names to Indigenous Names Is Unnecessary and Problematic

Australia Askes – Andrew McDowell

Australia’s place names carry a rich legacy of history, culture, and development, reflecting the nation’s complex and multi-layered heritage. While recognizing and honouring Indigenous cultures is important, there are several compelling reasons why the wholesale renaming of places based on Aboriginal claims—particularly when no written record exists and languages differ—is unnecessary and can pose challenges for cultural cohesion.

1. Lack of Written Records and Linguistic Variance

A significant challenge in changing place names to those claimed by Indigenous groups is the absence of written records. Indigenous Australians, prior to European colonization, relied on oral traditions. Oral histories are valuable, but they are inherently fluid, with names, meanings, and interpretations evolving over time and varying across different regions and tribes. Additionally, there was no single common Indigenous language; Australia was home to over 250 distinct languages, many of which had multiple dialects. As a result, the names given by different groups to the same geographical features can vary, making it difficult to determine which names are historically accurate.

The current system of place names, established during colonization, provides clarity and consistency across Australia’s vast landscape. Altering these names based on unverifiable claims would create confusion and fragmentation, especially when there is no clear consensus even among Indigenous groups about what those names should be.

2. Written History and Continuity

The current names of many Australian places were documented in writing during European exploration, settlement, and subsequent development of the nation. These names are part of Australia’s written history, tied to navigational charts, official records, maps, and legal documents that have stood the test of time. While some of these names may have been imposed by colonizers, they reflect Australia’s historical narrative, including the growth of towns, infrastructure, and governance. Changing these names would not only disrupt this continuity but also risk diminishing the value of the nation’s written historical legacy.

This is not to argue that Indigenous cultures should be overlooked, but there are other ways to honour them, such as through cultural preservation efforts, heritage sites, and education, without erasing established names with historical significance.

3. Lack of Necessity and Practical Concerns

Renaming places is not a necessity for reconciliation or cultural recognition. Efforts to preserve and promote Indigenous languages, stories, and heritage can coexist alongside Australia’s established place names. Furthermore, renaming could lead to a range of practical problems, from legal and administrative costs to logistical challenges. Signage, maps, and official documentation would need to be altered, which would be an expensive and time-consuming endeavour with little tangible benefit.

Moreover, forcing name changes could alienate portions of the population who feel connected to the current names, particularly those in rural and remote areas where places are named after local settlers or significant events in Australia’s post-colonial history.

4. Verifiability and Authenticity

Given the lack of written records from Indigenous cultures, many of the names proposed for change cannot be verified with certainty. In cases where the original Indigenous name is known and documented, there may be grounds for dual naming, but in many instances, the names are based on oral traditions that have been passed down through generations, making it difficult to determine their authenticity.

Changing names based on potentially incomplete or disputed histories risks undermining the integrity of place naming, as it opens the door to subjective interpretation rather than objective, evidence-based decisions. When names cannot be definitively verified, it becomes problematic to justify widespread changes.

Conclusion: Respect for All Aspects of Australia’s Heritage

Australia’s place names, whether derived from Indigenous, European, or other origins, form an integral part of the nation’s identity. Changing them en masse based on unverifiable claims could diminish the country’s historical continuity and cause confusion. Honouring Indigenous culture should not require the erasure of existing names that hold their own historical significance. Instead, efforts should focus on broader recognition and respect for the diversity of Australia’s past, ensuring that all facets of its heritage are acknowledged and preserved.

While Indigenous names and culture deserve to be remembered, the current place names have their own established significance, and change should be approached with caution, considering both the written history and the challenges of verifiability.