Learning from Ukraine: The Importance of Mass in Modern Warfare

The Ukraine conflict is showcasing the significance of new warfare technologies and tactics for the 21st century, underscoring a timeless principle – the importance of mass in warfare.

Russia’s incursion into Ukraine debunked several post-Cold War beliefs. These include the unchallenged spread of liberal democracy and the notion of the “End of History” as suggested by US academic Francis Fukuyama. The current era sees autocratic nations growing stronger as traditional powerhouses like the US, UK, Japan, and Germany witness a decline in global influence.

Ukraine stands out as an example of the changing face of warfare. Unlike the guerrilla tactics prominent in conflicts like Afghanistan and Iraq in the 1990s, Ukraine has witnessed a more conventional style of warfare. This shift caught many global powers by surprise, signaling a potential return to state-on-state conflicts.

Michta, commenting on the situation, emphasized that the scale required for modern warfare is beyond what most Western militaries are prepared for. While the West has focused on precision strikes and advanced technology, the Ukraine conflict has shown that mass still plays a crucial role, especially against a comparable adversary. Expensive, precision-engineered weapon systems are only advantageous when combined with large force numbers on the battlefield.

In a prolonged conflict, the ability to quickly replace lost resources and personnel becomes crucial. With adversaries likely producing simpler, more affordable systems, Western powers might struggle to keep up.

For nations like Australia, the lessons from Ukraine are pivotal. There’s a pressing need to boost the nation’s industrial base to ensure economic resilience, competitiveness, and a steady supply chain for the armed forces.

Dr. Ross Babbage stresses the importance of economic resilience and innovation for Australia, advocating for the creation of high-tech job opportunities and a vision for the country’s future.

To secure its place in the shifting global landscape, Australia needs a more long-term approach, breaking away from short-term objectives. The nation must reconsider its position as a “middle” or “regional” power and aim higher to ensure the best possible future for its citizens. Transparency, collaboration, and a shared vision for the country’s direction are essential moving forward.

Heston Russell Triumphs Over ABC in Defamation Case, Secures Significant Payout

Heston Russell Triumphs Over ABC in Defamation Case.

  • Former commando Heston Russell was awarded $390,000 by the Federal Court
  • ABC found guilty of defaming Russell in articles from 2020 and 2021

In a recent turn of events, former special forces commando, Heston Russell, clinched victory in his defamation suit against the ABC. The Federal Court judge determined that the ABC failed to establish that their articles were in the public’s interest.

Mr. Russell pursued legal action against the national broadcaster and two of its investigative journalists, Mark Willacy and Josh Robertson. He contended that their stories from 2020 and 2021 insinuated he was under investigation for allegedly shooting an unarmed detainee. These contentious stories were broadcast on various platforms, including television, radio, and the internet in October 2020 and again in November 2021.

The lawsuit, which spanned nine days during July and August, disclosed that the claims against Mr. Russell originated from a US Marine, referred to as ‘Josh’. Although not a direct witness, ‘Josh’ relayed to Mr. Willacy that he had overheard what he presumed to be a gunshot over the radio.

Throughout the proceedings, Mr. Russell was a constant presence at the Federal Court in Sydney’s Queen’s Square. His legal representation underscored the profound sense of violation he felt subsequent to the story’s publication.

Justice Michael Lee sided with Mr. Russell, declaring that ABC couldn’t substantiate their claim that the stories were of public importance. Consequently, Russell was granted $390,000 in compensation.

Throughout the proceedings, Sue Chrysanthou SC, representing Mr. Russell, dismissed the public interest defense forwarded by the ABC. She emphasized the gravity of misrepresenting serious accusations, particularly without offering the implicated party a chance to respond. Chrysanthou underscored that the narrative was more about image management for journalist Mr. Willacy than about authentic public interest.

Justice Lee’s observations on the trial underlined a prevailing defensiveness and reluctance to accept criticism on ABC’s end. The judge had previously identified ten defamatory elements within the articles, but the onus was on ABC to justify their public significance.

Chrysanthou painted a vivid metaphor, comparing the arguments from both sides to ‘two ships in the night’. While Russell’s side was commended for its adherence to legal principles and factual evidence, she criticized the ABC for their perceived lack of self-awareness and understanding of the case’s nuances.

Despite ABC’s assertions that their intent was never to malign Mr. Russell, the inclusion of his photograph and name indicated otherwise to many.

Nicholas Owens SC, on ABC’s defense, argued against the expectation for journalists to corroborate every piece of information, claiming it sets an unrealistic bar.

The outcome has ignited conversations around journalistic standards and the boundary between public interest and defamation.

NO MILITARY BENEFIT FOR AUSTRALIA IN GAZA

CALLS for Australia to commit boots to the ground in the latest Arab-Israeli war ignore the history of that region’s conflicts.

No external nation has ever committed troops in direct military support of Israel’s wars.

It’s simply not in their domestic or international interests.

There is however a long history of foreign nationals serving in the Israel Defence Force.

Israel has universal military service for all able-bodied citizens except ultra-orthodox sects, which do not recognise the Israeli state and claim exemption on religious grounds.

CLICK LINK to continue reading.

We would not benefit from getting involved | Australian Defence History, Policy and Veterans Issues (targetsdown.blogspot.com)

Time for a smile

A retired Army Officer was a keen duck hunter and often used hunting dogs when out for a shoot.

He heard about a kennel run by an ex-soldier who trained hunting dogs he thought he would give them a try.

He rang and was told that the only dog they had left was PTE Bowser.  He was told all dogs were given a rank depending on the level of its training and it would cost $10 for the weekend.  As it was a long weekend, he decided to give PTE Bowser a try.  The dog turned out to be a hopeless retriever, but the old man developed a strong friendship with the dog and vowed to use him next time he went hunting.

Two months later he rang and requested PTE Bowser and was told that CPL Bowser was available and would cost $40, the old man was delighted to hear of the dog’s promotion and took him out for the weekend.  The dog was very good at all aspects, pointing and retrieving, and the old man was pleased with his efforts.

It took 6 months before the old man was able to go hunting again, he rang the kennel and asked for CPL Bowser, and was overwhelmed to hear that he was now WO1 Bowser and would cost $300. He took WO1 Bowser out and the dog proved to be a master at all aspects of the hunt.

A month went by, and the old bloke couldn’t stop thinking about the dog, he called the kennel and offered to buy the dog for $500, he was shocked to hear that he could have him for $10,”Is this the same dog you have had since he was a PTE and has progressed to WO1?” the bloke asked, “What happened?”.

The kennel owner stated “Well, he got so good we promoted him to Major, now he just sits on his arse and barks all day.”

 

Hamas’ Goals in Israel Unlikely to Unfold as Expected

Hamas operatives entered Israel recently aiming to both kill and abduct Israelis for various malicious purposes. However, their strategies might not play out as intended. The current conflict has seen the death of over 1900 Israelis and over 2600 Palestinians, with these figures expected to rise.

The motivations behind Hamas’ actions can be attributed to their foundational purpose as a terrorist organization and an attempt to rally more support against Israel in the Middle East. While they have seen some success, with pro-Palestinian groups celebrating their efforts in various global locations, the broader implications may not be so favorable.

Hamas is also reacting to the growing relationships between Israel and other Middle Eastern countries, as well as the declining long-term support for Palestinian issues. In the short term, these attacks might hinder diplomatic relations between Israel and countries like Saudi Arabia. However, the long-term result could be a more devastated Gaza with its population facing severe consequences due to Israeli military actions and restrictions on trade and movement.

The Palestinian population might experience more hardship and potentially radicalize further. This unrest might also influence Israeli political dynamics, encouraging a tougher stance on Palestinian territories.

The media should be cautious when giving equal weight to the Hamas narrative. Drawing parallels, the article mentions how terrorists involved in major events like 9/11 also portrayed a narrative of victimhood but weren’t given equal media representation. Solidarity shouldn’t be confused with ignoring atrocities, as history has shown with supporters of leaders like Stalin and Mao.

While the conflict will lead to suffering on both sides, the long-term outcome might be a strengthened Israel and a weakened Hamas. This is contrary to the outcomes Hamas had anticipated. Those supporting Hamas should consider the broader implications of their actions on the Palestinian people’s future.

Federal Court Orders Ben Roberts-Smith to Deposit Nearly $1M Ahead of Appeal

In recent developments, the Federal Court has instructed war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith to set aside almost $1 million in security costs in anticipation of his upcoming appeal. This decision follows his significant defamation defeat against Nine Entertainment due to war crime allegations.

Last week, Justice Nye Perram issued the directive, specifying that Roberts-Smith should deposit a sum of $910,000 in three separate instalments. The initial payment, totaling $300,000, was mandated for payment by this Friday. An identical amount is expected by December 8. The concluding instalment of $310,000 is scheduled for January 29 of the upcoming year.

As per the court’s orders, given through mutual agreement, the designated amount should be transferred electronically into an interest-accruing account chosen by a Court Registrar.

Previously, in June, Justice Anthony Besanko ruled against Mr. Roberts-Smith in his prolonged civil lawsuit against renowned media houses including The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, and The Canberra Times. Justice Besanko’s findings highlighted that the accusations about Mr. Roberts-Smith – concerning four homicides in Afghanistan and intimidation of an ex-Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) associate – were likely accurate based on the civil measure of the balance of probabilities.

While Mr. Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross awardee, consistently refutes any allegations of misconduct, he has initiated an appeal scheduled for a two-week hearing in February. Legal filings from his representation critique the 730-page judgment on several grounds, pinpointing potential flaws stemming from selective evidence evaluation and conclusions regarding witness credibility.

Subsequent to Justice Besanko’s dismissal of the case, debates have persisted in court about the responsibility for the hefty legal expenses. Nine Entertainment is pushing for a third-party cost directive against Mr. Roberts-Smith’s financial supporters, which include entities such as Australian Capital Equity, Kerry Stokes’ private corporation, and the Seven Network, his past employer.

The court is aware that Mr. Roberts-Smith had previously acknowledged his responsibility to cover legal fees on an indemnity basis since March 2020, aligning with the date of a secondary settlement proposal.

Northrop Grumman Develops Precision-Track Artillery Shell for US Navy

In the evolving era of smart weaponry, Northrop Grumman has secured a contract from the US Navy to craft a self-navigating 57-mm artillery round for the Mk110 Naval Gun Mount, a medium-sized firearm on Littoral Combat Ships.

Historical naval warfare, as portrayed in classic films and documentaries, often showed chaotic scenes of explosive shots raining down in hopes of hitting the target. Modern naval strategies, however, emphasize accuracy over raw firepower. The trend has shifted from firing multiple heavy explosive rounds in hope of a few hitting the target to precisely aiming a single round to maximize its effectiveness.

The precision-centric philosophy is evident in Northrop’s latest 57-mm shell. Borrowing from their experience in transforming traditional bombs into precise weapons, Northrop’s new shell features a downsized, yet robust system equipped with seeker sensors. These sensors enable the shell to latch onto and chase even swift and manoeuvrable targets. Further, it’s equipped with a rear-facing steering system for final approach adjustments and a versatile fuse that can be set for close proximity or direct impact, ensuring maximum impact.

Notably, this advanced round can be shot from greater distances, maintain its course regardless of evasive manoeuvres by the target, and is compatible with the current deck gun without any modifications.

Dave Fine, Vice President of Armament Systems at Northrop Grumman, stated, “Our cutting-edge 57-mm guided round offers unparalleled tracking and guidance capabilities. This ensures the Navy not only effectively identifies moving threats but also possesses the unmatched precision to neutralize them.”

Source: Northrop Grumman

Vale 3475 BRIG John Francis McDonagh (Rtd) – RAE

6/11/26 – 11/10/23

My father BRIG John McDonagh RAE died last Tuesday.

Would you be able to put his funeral notice on your website please?

“Family and friends are invited to a funeral service BRIG John F McDonagh RAE , at the Eastern Suburbs Memorial Park South Chapel, 12 Military Rd Matraville NSW, on Wednesday 1 November 2023, at 11 am.   In lieu of flowers, donations to Legacy please.:

LEST WE FORGET

Richard McDonagh

VALE 2784878 JOHN ARTHUR GOODWIN – 1 RAR – RAEME

I received the following sad news this afternoon. Condolences to John’s family and friends

LEST WE FORGET

John was the radio mech for 1RAR in Vietnam 68 and went on to Malaya and Singapore Though RAEME Corp he has the Infantry combat badge

My great mate passed today at 12.30pm

There will not be a funeral but I hope a celebration of his life

John was at Coral

Please put this sad news out

With thanks

Chris Strudwick

 

Little Radar – Toting Robotic Gun Vehicle Aims To Protect Squads From Drones.

A trio of international defence contractors have teamed up to offer a new lower-tier counter-drone system that consists of a turreted infantry rifle with a computerized “smart sight,” a small radar array, and a six-wheeled uncrewed ground vehicle. The resulting combination could potentially be employed against other threats beyond drones and would also offer units on the ground valuable surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities.

Smart Shooter, headquartered in Israel, collaborated with Leonardo DRS, the U.S.-based subsidiary of Italy’s Leonardo, and American firm HDT Global to develop this system, seen in the picture at the top of this story. It is set to make its public debut at the Association of the U.S. Army’s main annual conference that opens in Washington, D.C. next week.

The weapon component of the system comes from Smart Shooter. It consists of the company’s Smash Hopper remote-controlled turret armed with a standard infantry rifle equipped with a Smash 2000-series computerized optic.

CLICK LINK to continue reading

Little Radar-Toting Robotic Gun Vehicle Aims To Protect Squads From Drones (thedrive.com)