The Unconventional Appeal of Trump’s America-First Approach

In the realm of modern U.S. presidents, Donald Trump stands as a polarizing figure, sparking either exuberant celebration or profound concern. His unexpected victory in 2016 marked a departure from the political norm, and he wasted no time establishing himself as the adversary of the mainstream media and traditional global alliances.

At the core of Trump’s appeal was his connection with the “forgotten Americans,” the working and middle class left behind by the forces of globalization. In his quest to “Make America Great Again,” he tapped into the sentiment that the post-Second World War order had failed these communities, promising a revival of Ronald Reagan’s era of economic prosperity.

Trump’s direct communication with the heartland of America, particularly in the Rust Belt and flyover states, resonated with those who felt overlooked. His commitment to end foreign wars and ensure that U.S. allies shared the burden garnered additional support from those tired of shouldering the costs in terms of “blood and treasure.”

The Trump administration’s transactional approach to foreign policy, coupled with the president’s bold and unapologetic style, raised concerns among the global policymaking establishment. Nations like Australia, traditionally reliant on U.S. strategic benevolence, faced the need to become self-sufficient.

Despite the initial shockwaves and apprehension following Trump’s first election, some positive aspects of his foreign policy. The administration provided weapons to Ukraine, brokered peace deals in the Middle East, and pushed European countries to increase defence spending.

The concern, revolves around the perception that a second Trump administration would be unbounded, marked by retribution, economic protectionism, and deals that are advantageous to the U.S.

A second Trump term could lead to shifts in U.S. commitments, such as potentially abandoning financial support in Europe and unsettling NATO. Others speculate on Trump’s unwavering support for Israel, possible deals with China’s president on Taiwan, and the broader tightening on global stability.

In the face of Trumps re-election, there’s a need to move beyond anguish and impose order on anxiety. The world has changed, and countries, particularly middle powers like Australia, must take more direct responsibility for their security and prosperity.

The reality is that the United States, in relative terms, is facing challenges and internal divisions. Whether under Trump or another leader, nations like Australia must adapt to a new global order, acknowledging the era of great power competition and multipolarity. Australia must prepare a transparent and collaborative approach between policymakers, elected officials, and the public to navigate this evolving landscape.

In essence, what is required is a nuanced understanding of Trump’s unconventional approach, acknowledging both positive and what we may see as negative outcomes. It encourages a pragmatic assessment of the changing global dynamics and emphasizes the need for countries to take charge of their destinies in an era of shifting power dynamics.



You may also like


  • Eamon December 9, 2023   Reply →

    Yes we must have an understanding of a bloke who thinks POWs are losers, abandoned the Kurds and thinks Putin is a genius.
    If Frontline is supporting this fellow, please take me off your email list.

    • Ray Payne December 9, 2023   Reply →

      Eamon, merely providing news. As I always say “Read what interests you, ignore what doesn’t.” Merry Christmas mate. Ray

  • Elliot December 10, 2023   Reply →

    “In essence, what is required is a nuanced understanding of Trump’s unconventional approach…”. Now there’s a challenge when a profoundly ignorant man driven by greed and hatred has his finger on the nuclear button.

  • Brian Buzzard December 10, 2023   Reply →

    If America goes with Donald Trump then the only Foreign Policy will be “America First”. They took 3 years to stop aggression in WW1 and 3 years to get into WW2. They would have left Australia to its own defences except for the Pearl Harbour attack. Treaties and Alliances mean nothing to Americans. They think they won both World Wars on their own. The best defence preparation we can do is to have a new NATIONAL SERVICE for all persons (M & F & T) from ages 19 and 20 for ONE YEAR. Many kids are still at school at 18, so 19 would be a good starting year. {GAP could then mean ‘Good All-round Preparation’ for defence of Australia}.
    Those who don’t want a “Tin Hat and a Gun” can be Medics, Drivers, Builders, Mechanics, Band-persons, Caterers or the like. those who can and would defend this Great Land would do the Infantry, Artillery, Field engineers, Armour, Special Forces, Navy and Airforce. WAKE UP AUSTRALIA

Leave a comment