In the aftermath of the devastating drone attack on a US base in Jordan, the United States, led by National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, retaliated with a series of fierce strikes on Iranian forces and Iran-backed militants in Iraq and Syria. The strikes, aimed at more than 85 targets across 7 facilities, were a resounding message of strength and resolve.

The human cost of these strikes was significant. The Iraqi government reported 16 casualties, including civilians, while 23 lives were lost in Syria, according to Rami Abdulrahman, director of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The strikes stirred a global impact, prompting the United Kingdom to join forces with the US in a massive airstrike campaign against the Houthis in Yemen. The coordinated effort targeted 36 Houthi locations in 13 different areas.

As the dust settled, the Houthis, undeterred by the military onslaught, vowed to escalate their actions. They pledged to disrupt regional trade, regardless of the cost, potentially ushering in further instability and economic repercussions. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan defended the strikes on Sunday, emphasizing their necessity and effectiveness. He also did not rule out the possibility of directly targeting locations in Iran.

“We intend to take additional strikes and additional action to continue to send a clear message that the United States will respond when our forces are attacked, or people are killed,” Sullivan declared.

The significance of the US and UK’s military actions lies in the clear signal they send – a resolute willingness to respond forcefully to attacks on their forces. However, the repercussions of these strikes remain uncertain. The Houthis, vowing retaliation, could shape the course of the conflict in the days and weeks to come. The international community watches with bated breath, uncertain of the twists and turns that may unfold in this tense geopolitical landscape.

The flag has been hoisted, it flutters on high

This always brings a tear to my eye

Some say our flag needs to be changed

I believe those people are totally deranged

Along with the date-change bullies

And the virtue signalling mob at Woolies

Some are on this earth to complain

Where we see sunshine, they see rain

I cleaned the Barbie, forks and tongs

And put on my trusty well worn thongs

Rugger shorts and a singlet top

And plenty of sunscreen Slip Slap Slop

I mowed a strip for the backyard cricket

And grabbed a wheelie bin for a wicket

I managed to get the kids on side

By rigging a temporary water slide

I dragged some chairs under the trees

The bureau is predicting forty degrees

The esky is loaded with champers and beer

Time for a coldie before the mob gets here

While waiting for the guests to show

Our Kiwi neighbour said “Greetings Bro “

“The mussus and kuds are on their way

We’ll help you celebrate Australia Day.”

Time to play games to soak up the beer

Winning shots are greeted by jubilant cheers

The girls watched on; but disowned the boys

Who carried on like kids with new toys

The backyard cricket was declared a draw

After it descended into total uproar

Batsman Kiwi Bob lost his calm

When Gazza decided to bowl underarm

Openly gay, and very good looking

Tony has offered to do all the cooking

Asif and Mustafa from the Middle East

Have prepared an enormous exotic feast

Prawns, burgers lamb chops and snags

Under the weight of this fare the table sags

The Middle Eastern food was a new taste treat

But Kiwi Bob says a Hangi is hard to beat

Indigenous Dave is an interstate trucker

He surprised us with authentic bush tucker

While Vietnamese friends, bless their souls

Brought a big plate of rice paper rolls

After lunch and the booze had kicked in

It was time for the karaoke to begin

The National Anthem, in patriotic roar

Pity the poor neighbours next door

The setting sun marks the end of a great day

The girls want to leave, the blokes want to stay

It’s not hard to guess who’ll win that debate

Though nine o’clock is hardly late

I guess that the knockers will feel that they won

By refusing to embrace it and join in the fun

My message to them is loud and clear

Wake up and get onboard next year.

If you need assistance with lodging a compensation claim with DVA, or with your wellbeing journey, and don’t know where to start, engaging an Ex-Service Organisation (ESO) advocate might be the answer you’re looking for.

Ex-Service Organisation (ESO) advocates play an important role in supporting veterans and families through the claims process and helping find supports for improving wellbeing. Importantly, these services are provided free of charge (some may charge a small administration fee), meaning there is no need to pay someone to help.

ESO advocates can be found on the Advocacy Register, which is a national database that provides contact details for advocacy services across Australia.

ESO advocacy is delivered in line with service delivery standards and ESO advocates are trained through the Advocacy Training and Development Program to meet national training standards for advice they provide to the veteran community.

It’s important to remember that DVA does not give any particular provider or advocate special access or treatment. Using a provider who charges for their services does not guarantee a successful claim or faster processing.

Veterans and families also have the option to engage with DVA directly online by using MyService. Through MyService veterans and their families can lodge claims and track their progress, apply for a Veteran Card, book transport and more.

For more information please visit What to consider if you’re looking for help.

ED: From my inbox … thanks Ralph.

My father was born and bought up in Bendigo, Victoria, Australia and from an early age, [1930/40s] introduced the family to the ‘Waking up the Dragon Ceremony’ at Easter.

He was at school with many children of Chinese descent.

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrOo8vOU8FldIQAUC836At.;_ylu=Y29sbwNncTEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1707197518/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.sbs.com.au%2flanguage%2fchinese%2fen%2farticle%2fwhat-measures-100m-has-6000-scales-and-is-set-to-be-awoken-in-bendigo%2fisjfl4cbq/RK=2/RS=Ma4ZEWJg1zgvwLPLatbohAdOz.c-

Ralph Wollmer

Washington’s ability to deter or counter the threat to Taiwan is challenged by China’s growing military advantage, driven by industrial strength, ongoing military buildup, and geographical proximity to the island. The central concern is a potential Chinese amphibious assault on Taiwan, which, if successful, would establish China as the dominant military power in the Western Pacific.

The narrow Taiwan Strait, measuring only 80 miles at its narrowest point, poses a significant challenge. Chinese sensor networks closely monitor maritime and airborne traffic, making U.S. surface warships and aircraft vulnerable to attacks. While U.S. submarines are considered crucial for Taiwan’s defence, their limited numbers compared to local Chinese forces raise concerns about their effectiveness.

A potential solution involves U.S. submarines launching canisters with low-cost, unmanned drones to create a mesh network for surveillance and targeting of key Chinese assets. By deploying drones with reasonable endurance from half of the launch tubes on each Virginia-class sub, continuous surveillance of the Taiwan Strait during an amphibious assault could be maintained. Unmanned submersibles with similar capabilities could complement the manned submarine force.

These “attainable” (expendable) systems, equipped with high-frequency communication links, could resist Chinese electronic jamming. Their affordability and expendable nature make them a cost-effective option compared to Chinese countermeasures. Large-scale deployment would ensure a self-healing mesh network, transmitting precise information about high-priority targets to various users.

Companies like Sparton Corporation, a subsidiary of Elbit America, are exploring relevant technology. The concept aligns with RAND Corporation’s 2020 report on operating low-cost, reusable unmanned aerial vehicles in contested environments. While these preparations aim to deter conflict, the use of attainable payloads launched from attack subs offers a concept with few counters if conflict arises.

By Bob Buick MM

I strongly believe we are becoming a 2^nd world nation and have been since thirty/forty years ago with globalisation. We are no longer industrially capable, all self-sustainable manufacturing is gone and we import matches, pins and needles and our major exports are mineral and agricultural products.

At 83 years I’ve witnessed the nation’s halcyon decades the 50s to the 80s and I’m in no doubt the nation is in decline, and I blame all political parties, especially Labor and Liberal. They have collectively failed the colonial administers and past members of parliaments in states and national governments. 

I quote Lee Kuan Yew, PM of Singapore of the last century, when he stated that Australia will become “The white trash of Asia!”, I laughed at the time, but he had a true vision, unlike any politician of Australia post WW2. As there a few Qld LNP’s BBC to this message I am not expecting any correspondence from them on these thoughts, except the Auto-Courtesy reply.

Do they have the same vision as I and are unable to speak publicly?

Even Gen X lacks any vision of their future as they are blinded by political humbug and poor public media policies bullshit as their near to mid future is entering the sewerage system.

They have the same comms ability as I do and never voice their thoughts through the media as the millennials behave like anarchists rioting over unimportant causes like sexual preferences, or that nett zero is destroying humanity, it is a natural evolution in the planet’s cycle. Do Gen Xs remember their childhood and lifestyle with the political freedoms from socialist government controls?

Are they aware that if Australia does not sustain today’s lifestyle as a minimum there will be no prospect of improving the nation’s sustainability and self-reliant prospects, this is the real TIPPING POINT WITH NO CHANCE OF RETURN to a nation’s prosperity!

I am forming the opinion that WW3 is needed against Russia, China and rouge Iran to destroy woke socialism in Western cultures and recreate nationalism that the EU and UN have destroyed, a dream of the World Economic Forum (WEF)

With less than an expected decade to live, I have no fear for any future I’ve lived the best years of my life and will endure the future knowing that my generation has had the best of all generations to date, generations in the future have a challenge and I do sincerely apologise I was not as vigilant nor did I challenged the political system before but will in the future for as long as I’m able.

Today I started in earnest!

Bob Buick

Mountain Creek Qld 4557

 

ED: Spend 10 minutes watching the video below, then think about how much would you like to hear a speech like this in our Australian Parliament?   

In a riveting address to the NZ Parliament, the recently re-elected Shane Jones, now the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries in the new post-Ardern government, embarked on a mission to ignite a “Fightback” reminiscent of his political prowess in New Zealand.

Known for his captivating oratory skills, Jones, a seasoned politician, is fluent in Maori, allowing him to delve into discussions about sensitive topics, such as work ethic, with a nuanced perspective that might be deemed controversial if articulated by someone else. His ability to navigate such discussions reflects his deep understanding of cultural dynamics.

In Maori tradition, a meeting is referred to as a “hui,” and one of Jones’ notable comments about Maori elders resonates across borders: “There’s lots of hui, but no doee.” This phrase encapsulates a sentiment that transcends cultural boundaries, expressing the frustration with meetings and discussions that lack tangible outcomes, a phenomenon he believes is already present in Australia.

Jones, who secured his fifth non-consecutive term in the 2023 general election, brings a wealth of experience to the table. Holding multiple key ministerial positions, he assumes the roles of Associate Minister for Energy and Finance, as well as Minister for Oceans and Fisheries, Regional Development, and Resources. This diverse portfolio showcases his commitment to addressing a broad spectrum of issues crucial to the development and well-being of New Zealand.

As Jones takes the stage in the Parliament, his charisma and command of language captivate the audience. His commitment to initiating a “Fightback” resonates with those who believe in decisive action and tangible results. Drawing on his extensive political career and comprehensive understanding of various sectors, Jones aims to steer New Zealand towards a future marked by progress and prosperity.

The presence of Shane Jones in the political landscape heralds an era of dynamic leadership, where speeches are not just words but catalysts for change. Whether discussing cultural nuances, economic policies, or environmental initiatives, Jones’ multifaceted approach positions him as a leader capable of navigating the complexities of contemporary challenges. As the Fightback begins, the New Zealand Parliament eagerly anticipates the impact of Shane Jones’ vision for a brighter, more resilient future.

 

In a startling revelation that has sent shockwaves through the Portarlington veteran community, the former RSL President, Darren McDonald, finds himself at the centre of controversy after being accused of masquerading as a decorated war veteran. The recent exposé, covered extensively in today’s local newspapers such as the Geelong Advertiser and The Melbourne Herald Sun, details McDonald’s arrest and subsequent charges brought against him by law enforcement.

The alleged imposter stands accused of falsely claiming military service, specifically in Cambodia, as suggested by the unauthorized display of medals associated with this purported deployment. This revelation has not only cast a shadow over McDonald’s reputation but has also ignited concerns about the potential existence of other individuals engaged in similar acts of deceit.

The Portarlington RSL, an institution dedicated to supporting and honouring genuine veterans, now faces the challenging task of reconciling the betrayal by one of its own former leaders. Questions are being raised about the efficacy of the vetting processes in place within the organization, prompting a thorough review to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.

The community, once united under the banner of respect for military service, now grapples with the betrayal of trust as they come to terms with the alleged actions of a man who held a position of prominence. McDonald’s arrest serves as a stark reminder that, despite stringent measures in place to safeguard the honour and integrity of military service, fraudulent individuals can still exploit vulnerabilities in the system.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the Portarlington veteran community faces a period of introspection, emphasizing the importance of upholding the values and sacrifices associated with genuine military service. The incident also underscores the need for continued vigilance and robust verification processes to safeguard the sanctity of military honours within the RSL and similar organizations dedicated to the welfare of veterans.

Pauline Hanson’s Speech in the Senate

ED: From my inbox multiple times.

Pauline Hanson has made claims about why many Australians voted no to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, before hitting out at the term ‘Traditional Owners’ in a fiery speech that sparked outrage in parliament.

On Monday One Nation leader Senator Hanson approvingly read out to the Senate a comment on her Facebook page from ‘Rebecca’ while delivering a stinging postmortem on the defeated Voice referendum.

‘Can we stop using the term Traditional Owners?’ Senator Hanson quotes the post as asking.

‘Aborigines did not and do not own Australia. They were original inhabitants, and that is it.’

Mother Nature provided all what Aboriginals claim as theirs. They did not build Ayer’s Rock, the Three Sisters, Kakadu, the river systems, the mountains etc.

‘They used the land and its natural resources and structures that were already there.

‘They did not construct or design a damn thing and just as they continue, they do today they use and take whatever is available to them.

‘That’s how a lot of Australians feel.’

Senator Lidia Thorpe’s interjected: ‘Not all Australians’.

‘What people tend to forget, like Senator Thorpe, is that I was born here too so were millions of other Australians and the migrants who have come here, ‘Senator Hanson continued.

‘All I have asked for is equality for all Australians. If you need it, you get that helping hand. If you don’t need it, then fine you don’t.

‘If you work hard for what you need and that’s been proven by the 11 Senators in this Parliament who actually are of Aboriginal descent and yet you want special treatment. ‘And you don’t deserve it, no more than millions of other Australians,’ Senator Hanson said with a glare across the chamber.

The shouted interruptions increased until Senate President Sue Lines intervened and told both Senators to take their seats.

After a telling pause, she told Senator Hanson to resume but to address remarks to her as the chair.

Senator Hanson resumed and asserted that Australia ‘does not only belong to the Stone Age hunter gatherers discovered by the British explorers and settlers’.

‘I have to ask the question what special or unique contribution entitle Indigenous Australians to special or unique rights greater than anybody else. The answer is none whatsoever, ‘Senator Hanson said.

‘There has only ever been one nation on this continent founded on the first of January 1901 so there cannot be a legitimate treaty, and this means there is no requirement for so-called “truth telling”,’
she said.

‘This is rewriting history to maximize settlements in a treaty, just forget it.

‘We are all Australians together and should be treated equally.’

Earlier in the same speech Senator Hanson had singled Senator Thorpe out for special mention.

‘There is no war on Indigenous Australians as Senator Thorpe pretends,’ Senator Hanson said.

‘That she sits in parliament along with other Indigenous people shows this claim for the lie that it is.

‘Senator is no victim on her taxpayer funded salary and most Indigenous people reject the idea they are victims.’

Senator Hanson also accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and other proponents of the Voice of being ‘out of touch’.

 

ED: In my view:

In her recent speech, Senator Pauline Hanson delivered a passionate address that bravely explores the complexities surrounding the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. The speech opens with a quote from a supporter named Rebecca, providing a platform for the discussion on the use of the term ‘Traditional Owners.’ This immediately sets the stage for a candid and thought-provoking conversation on Indigenous representation in Australia.

Senator Hanson echoes Rebecca’s sentiment, suggesting that Aboriginal Australians, as the original inhabitants, did not claim ownership of the land but rather embraced it as part of their heritage. The speech skillfully highlights the perspective that Indigenous communities utilized the natural resources and structures already present, rather than constructing or designing new elements.

The Senator goes on to advocate for equality, emphasizing her belief that all Australians, regardless of background, should be treated fairly. She draws attention to her own Australian heritage and that of millions of others, underlining the shared identity of those born in the country and migrants alike.

The passionate dialogue reaches a climax with Senator Lidia Thorpe’s interjection, leading to a spirited exchange in the parliamentary chamber. Despite the interruptions, Senator Hanson skillfully maintains her focus, addressing the importance of equality and refuting claims of victimhood.

The speech further delves into the historical context, questioning the need for a treaty or “truth telling.” Senator Hanson asserts that Australia’s foundation as a nation in 1901 renders the concept of a legitimate treaty obsolete. This perspective is presented with a strong conviction that encourages listeners to reconsider historical narratives.

My conclusion, Senator Hanson’s speech fosters a positive dialogue by challenging existing narratives and advocating for equality among all Australians. While her views may be controversial, the speech demonstrates a commitment to fostering a sense of shared identity and dismantling perceived divisions. The passionate delivery and unwavering stance contribute to a compelling discourse on Indigenous rights and national unity.

Ray.