Wind and solar are not environmentally safe.

Another view as to why wind and solar are not environmentally safe.

Professor Plimer aims to unravel the knowledge gap between the general public’s understanding and that of the so-called progressive elites, particularly regarding the challenges posed by wind droughts and the proposed solutions outlined in Australia’s renewable energy plan.

A brief look at Operation Coburg

Operation Coburg, conducted from 24 January to 1 March 1968, marked a joint military effort by Australia and New Zealand during the Vietnam War. The operation unfolded in the context of heightened intelligence suggesting an imminent offensive by the North Vietnamese People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) and Viet Cong (VC) during the Tết New Year festival. This prompted the deployment of the 1st Australian Task Force (1 ATF) away from its base in Phuoc Tuy Province to reinforce American and South Vietnamese forces defending the Long Binh–Bien Hoa complex, northeast of Saigon.

American and South Vietnamese intelligence reports had signalled the likelihood of a PAVN/VC offensive, leading the Australians and New Zealanders to strategically position themselves in the vicinity of the village of Trang Bom. Anticipating attacks on their newly established fire support bases along the PAVN/VC lines of communication, 1 ATF sought to disrupt their plans.

The clash between Australian forces and the VC began with early patrols in Area of Operations (AO) Columbus, escalating when Fire Support Base (FSB) Andersen faced repeated major ground assaults. Although Operation Coburg was initiated too late to prevent attacks on Saigon, the Australians and New Zealanders effectively hampered the PAVN/VC lines of communication, limiting their ability to target the Long Binh–Bien Hoa complex. Additionally, they successfully impeded the withdrawal of PAVN/VC forces, inflicting heavy casualties.

This operation marked a milestone as the first deployment of 1 ATF beyond its Tactical Area of Responsibility (TAOR) in Phuoc Tuy, establishing a precedent for subsequent operations outside the province. Concurrently, Australian forces in Phuoc Tuy Province successfully repelled VC attacks against Bà Rịa and Long Điền as part of the broader Tet Offensive in South Vietnam.

On 24 January 1968, 1 ATF headquarters, led by Brigadier Ron Hughes, was air-inserted into the new area of operations between Bien Hoa and Long Khanh provinces. The force initially consisted of two battalions—2nd Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment with Victor Company Royal New Zealand Infantry Regiment (RNZIR) and 7 RAR—along with supporting elements. They were strategically positioned approximately 55 kilometres from Nui Dat.

The operation aimed to deny PAVN/VC access to suitable sites for launching rocket attacks on allied bases and installations, including Bien Hoa Air Base and the Long Binh Logistics Depot. The AO Columbus was assigned to 1 ATF, sparsely inhabited, and situated east of Long Binh, with the concept of operations calling for the establishment of fire support bases, including FSB Andersen and FSB Harrison, to secure strategic locations.

PAVN/VC forces identified in AO Columbus included elements from the VC 274th Regiment, 5th Division, PAVN 84A Artillery (Rocket) Regiment, and the Dong Nai Regiment. Intensive patrols and reconnaissance-in-force operations by the Australians in AO Columbus resulted in engagements with VC forces, including clashes in bunker complexes and skirmishes.

While 1 ATF effectively denied the PAVN/VC use of its AO, the role of the Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) was limited due to the heavy VC presence, leading to the withdrawal of SAS patrols. Notably, on 29 January, D Company, 7 RAR engaged in a significant battle with VC forces, resulting in casualties on both sides.

Despite challenges, Operation Coburg achieved its objectives of disrupting PAVN/VC plans, safeguarding allied bases, and limiting enemy freedom of manoeuvre. The operation demonstrated the effectiveness of coordinated Australian and New Zealand military efforts during a critical period in the Vietnam War.

Alternative treatment for veterans.

A unique treatment approach incorporating ice baths, structured exercise, and cooking classes has demonstrated positive outcomes for individuals with treatment-resistant PTSD, according to military veterans. A former Afghanistan veteran, previously at a low point post-medical discharge from the army, shared his struggle with suicide attempts, imprisonment, and alcohol benders. Traditional clinical group treatments proved ineffective, leading him to seek alternative solutions.

The turnaround came when he enrolled in a 12-week program at Hope in Health, a four-bedroom home-style treatment centre in Northern New South Wales. The multidisciplinary team, including psychologists, a personal trainer, social workers, and a chef, developed a personalized plan focusing on retraining both mind and body. The daily regimen comprised yoga, ice baths, exercise, mindfulness, and cooking classes, providing a tailored approach to recovery.

Hope in Health’s co-founder emphasized treating military veterans as elite athletes, addressing the underlying causes of PTSD or addiction issues. The program aimed to repair physical and mental health by employing physiotherapy, acupuncture, massages, and specialized training techniques.

While the Department of Veterans Affairs funds such experimental rehabilitation programs for thousands of ex-military personnel annually, concerns have been raised by some experts. A psychiatrist from the Australian College of Psychiatrists questioned the long-term efficacy of alternative approaches and emphasized the need for evidence-based interventions.

Another military veteran highlighted the challenges of transitioning from a highly structured military life to civilianhood, advocating for more personalized mental health facilities. In response, the Currumbin RSL’s Veterans Support Centre introduced pilot initiatives, such as gardening, running, and wildlife-focused clubs, to engage veterans in the Gold Coast and Tweed Coast regions.

The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide, prompted by 13 urgent interim recommendations, urged simplification of the claims system for veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs affirmed its commitment to enhancing mental health and welfare approaches in response to the Royal Commission’s findings.

Seeking Two 1RAR Group veterans who served on Operation Hump – 8th November 1965.

Attention 1RAR Group Veterans

My name is John Doorley, and I am reaching out with request to two Vietnam veterans who served with the 1RAR Group on Operation Hump on the 8th of November 1965. I have been asked to coordinate the 1RAR Group contingent to join with members of the 173d Airborne Brigade (Sep) for a special journey back to Vietnam to commemorate the battle during Operation Hump.

The return to Vietnam tour will be held over the period March 1st to 10th, 2024.

This pilgrimage aims to honour the sacrifices, bravery, and camaraderie demonstrated by our fellow soldiers during those pivotal days. We believe that the best way to pay tribute to the past is by returning to the very grounds where history was written and forging new memories.

Event Details:

  • Battle Commemoration: March 1st to 10th, 2024
  • Location: Vietnam, the site of the Battle of HUMP
  • Expenses: All expenses will be covered

We are extending an invitation for two veterans to join the rest of the 1RAR Group contingent on this all expenses paid tour. Those interested must be able to gain their doctors clearance and be in age-appropriate fitness. You must have a current Passport, also you must have served on Operation Hump.

If you or someone you know fits the criteria and would be interested in participating, please contact John Doorley at the earliest convenience. John can be reached via email at [email protected] or by phone at 0408 877 507.

If you have any questions, please give me a call.  This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to join with other members of the 1RAR Group and members of the 173d Airborne Brigade (Sep) on this fully sponsored tour.

Duty First

John Doorley

1RAR Contingent Coordinator

[email protected]

0408 877 507

The Siege of Tobruk: Defiance, Resilience, and the Rats of Tobruk.

Tomorrow, December 7th marks the 82nd anniversary of the Siege of Tobruk, a pivotal event during World War II where Australian soldiers and Allied troops defended the strategically vital harbour town from German and Italian forces. This tribute explores the resilience, bravery, and significance of the defenders, known as the ‘Rats of Tobruk,’ and their role in thwarting the Axis powers’ advance through Egypt.

In January 1941, the 6th Australian Division captured Tobruk from the Italians, marking a crucial victory in the North African campaign. This success turned the town into a garrison for Australian and British forces, setting the stage for the subsequent siege. The term ‘Rats of Tobruk,’ initially coined as an insult by Nazi propagandist Lord Haw Haw, became a badge of honour for the besieged troops.

Tobruk’s strategic importance lay in its harbor, a critical supply route for the Allies. The Royal Navy and the Royal Australian Navy, known as the ‘Tobruk Ferry’ service, played a vital role in maintaining the link to the outside world despite the constant threat of attacks on incoming ships. Holding Tobruk meant forcing the enemy to transport supplies overland, hindering their advance through Egypt.

From April to December 1941, Tobruk endured relentless ground assaults, shelling, and bombing by the Axis forces. The defenders, particularly the men of the 9th Division and the 18th Brigade of the 7th Division, exhibited unwavering determination, earning the moniker ‘Rats of Tobruk.’ The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and the ‘scrap iron flotilla’ of the RAN contributed significantly to the town’s defence during this arduous period.

The Royal Navy and the Royal Australian Navy, acting as the ‘Tobruk Ferry,’ faced significant challenges, with many ships lost or damaged during supply runs into Tobruk harbour. Despite these sacrifices, the Allies recognized the importance of holding Tobruk to prevent the enemy’s advance.

Evacuations of troops began in August 1941, with the 2/13 Battalion and two companies of the 2/15th Battalion remaining in place until the siege’s end in December. The 9th Division and attached troops, during their eight-month presence in Cyrenaica, lost over 830 soldiers and witnessed more than 2,170 wounded. A memorial on Anzac Parade in Canberra pays tribute to all those who served during this crucial period of the Second World War.

The Siege of Tobruk stands as a testament to the resilience and courage of the ‘Rats of Tobruk’ and their Allied counterparts. Their unwavering defence of the strategically important town not only thwarted the Axis powers’ advance but also became a symbol of defiance that raised morale throughout the British Empire and Commonwealth during the challenging year of 1941. The legacy of Tobruk and the sacrifices made by the defenders continue to be honoured through memorials and remembrances.

ADF OFF TO JAPAN FOR EXCERISE YAMA SAKURA 85

The Australian Defence Force is set to actively participate in Exercise Yama Sakura 85 alongside Japan and the United States, marking a significant stride in bolstering the nation’s interoperability and mutual defence capabilities within the Pacific region. Commencing on December 4 at Camp Higashi-Chitose on Hokkaido Island, this exercise has a longstanding history, originating in 1982 with the primary aim of enhancing interoperability between the Japanese and U.S. military forces, while also honing command and control for large-scale operations.

Australia, having been an observer for over a decade, is now taking a more active role, reflecting the evolving strategic alignment among these nations. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles emphasized the importance of this collaboration, stating, “Our growing strategic alignment contributes to shared security challenges in our region and is key to promoting an open, secure, and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

With expectations that over 200 members of the Australian Defence Force will partake in this large-scale command post training exercise, the move underscores a commitment to trilateral cooperation aimed at fostering an open, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific region. The invitation extended to the Australian Army followed the conclusion of Exercise Yama Sakura 83.

Major General Scott Winter AM, Commander of the 1st Division, affirmed the significance of Australia’s involvement, stating, “Australia’s participation in Exercise Yama Sakura 85 is a significant step forward in trilateral cooperation in support of an open, stable, and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

This iteration of the exercise is poised to be the largest to date, featuring 230 members of the Australian Army, 1,500 members of the U.S. Army, and 5,300 members of the Japanese Ground Self-Defence Force. The timing of Yama Sakura 85 follows Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles’ official trip to Japan, during which he reinforced the strategic partnership between the two nations.

During the visit, Marles underscored Japan’s central role as an “indispensable partner” to Australia, engaging in discussions with Japanese Minister of Defence Kihara Minoru. The ministers welcomed the entry into force of the landmark Japan-Australia Reciprocal Access Agreement, a transformative agreement that enhances bilateral defence cooperation and interoperability of forces. The visit also provided an opportunity to discuss recent milestones in the strategic partnership between Australia and Japan.

Another Russian General Killed in Ukraine.

Yet Another Loss: Russian Major General Vladimir Zavadsky’s Demise Linked to Friendly Mine Incident

In the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Major General Vladimir Zavadsky has become the latest casualty, marking the twelfth known death of Russian generals in the region and the seventh officially acknowledged by the Russian authorities.

Contrary to initial reports suggesting Zavadsky’s demise occurred during frontline combat, emerging details indicate a different narrative. Zavadsky, the deputy commander of the 14th Army Corps, reportedly lost his life due to a landmine laid by friendly troops in the rear area, away from the front-line clashes that were previously believed to be the cause.

Even though the Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School, Zavadsky’s alma mater, initially announced his death on the VKontakte social network, the announcement has been subsequently removed.

Sources within Russia have asserted that the incident occurred at the end of the previous month, with VChK-OGPU, an anti-corruption channel in Russia. According to the channel, the official cause of death is yet to be determined, but there are indications that Ukrainian artillery strikes might be implicated.

This event adds to the grim tally of high-ranking Russian generals who have lost their lives during Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, with Zavadsky becoming the seventh to be officially confirmed. The most senior Russian general confirmed killed in Ukraine thus far is Lieutenant General Oleg Yuryevich Tsokov, who fell victim to a Ukrainian airstrike in Berdyansk in July 2023, employing British Storm Shadow cruise missiles.

While both NATO and Russian forces document mine usage, incidents involving friendly mines are not unheard of, often attributed to potential communication lapses between units. The complexity of the situation underscores the challenges and risks inherent in military operations.

 

Reply from SA Premier

OFFICIAL

Thank you for your email in relation to the Public Holidays Bill 2023.

I am disappointed that the Liberal Party is purposely spreading misinformation regarding the new Public Holidays Bill 2023.

I can assure you nothing in the legislation passed by Parliament changes ANZAC Day, Christmas Day being commemorated on 25 April and 25 December respectively, in fact it enshrines those days in legislation as a public holiday.

In fact, the legislation enshrined Christmas Day as a public holiday on whatever day it lands on and Easter Sunday as a public holiday, something the old legislation did not do.

The only party that wanted to abolish a public holiday during the debate in Parliament was the Liberal Party who sought to abolish Easter Saturday as a public holiday, something the South Australian Labor Party opposed.

Nevertheless, to avoid any doubt, this morning I have announced that the legislation will be amended to include the names of the holidays next to the date. This will mean that alongside the date of the public holiday, the name of the public holiday will be included in the legislation for each public holiday.

This will mean in addition to the ANZAC Day Commemoration Act 2005 (see attached) that enshrines in legislation the commemoration of ANZAC Day on
25 April, we will include the name of the holiday in the Public Holidays Act.

South Australia is one of the only States in Australia to have a separate ANZAC Day Commemoration Act 2005 that declares ANZAC Day as a day of national significance. It also restricts activities such as public sporting or entertainment events occurring between 5.00 AM and 12 noon on ANZAC Day.

The ANZAC Day Commemoration Act 2005 was introduced by the previous Labor Government and as you will see in the legislation it specifically stipulates “ANZAC Day means 25 April in any year”.

I trust this alleviates your concerns and I appreciate you taking the time to write to me regarding this matter.

Yours sincerely

Peter Malinauskas

PREMIER