Australia’s Aboriginal Industry: Always Was, Always Will Be About Power.

By David Barton.

In 1983, as a naïve youth worker and concerned by what I had been reading since the early 1970s about what was happening with Aborigines in Alice Springs, I moved there to see what I could do to help. All told, I spent six years in Central Australia, leaving both depressed and convinced that the situation could never be fixed. …

Unfortunately, much of what passes for Aboriginal ‘culture’ today is an invention of the last 50 years. Fortunately, much authentic Aboriginal culture of the past has vanished. The gruesome initiations, genital mutilation, inflicted cicatrices, burns, ritual spearings, sorcery and payback murders have by and large disappeared. Nevertheless, inter-tribe clan grievances often remain, as can be seen at some football indigenous matches, both on the field and amongst the spectators. Even though these encounters can still become violent, at least those conflicts are mostly played out with a football, not spears and clubs.

Meanwhile, the Aboriginal Industry is chock full of ill-informed, urban myth-makers and illusionists, this caste of urgers and deluded pretenders giving rise to the patronising insistence on the uniqueness of ‘Aboriginal knowledge’ about everything from agriculture and fish farms (a lá Bruce Pascoe), water and fire management (a lá ‘cultural burning’) to Aboriginal ‘art’, ‘fashion’ and even ‘astronomy’, and not to mention Ernie Dingo and Richard Walley’s thoroughly overdone ‘Welcome to Country”. This is mostly snake oil fakery, an effort to convince contemporary Australians that the Aborigines of old were something they clearly never were not.

Worse, histories and observational accounts of early Aboriginal life and culture are vanishing from library shelves, replaced by the anti-white post-modern dogma of ‘invasion, colonisation and inter-generational trauma’. It is unusual today to find any history book about Aborigines in a secondary or tertiary institution that is more than fifteen years old. This is cultural censure and erasure happening right under our noses. We are all the poorer for it, black and white alike.

Meanwhile, the recent invention, exaggeration, distortion and misrepresentation of the alleged ‘frontier wars’ serves as a made-to-order replacement ‘history’ intended to raise the status of Aboriginal people and degrade that of settlers. It is yet another bill of goods, a distorting sham, being hawked by a power-grabbing activist elite in whose interest it is to falsify and distort our history. The goal, need it be said, is an attempt to paint a genocidal racism as Australia’s original sin. …

Equality of opportunity is not enough for the power hungry, to whom any perceived inequality in outcome is an opportunity:

Unfortunately, self-determination for many people who today identify as Aboriginal is taken to mean the normal rules — keeping children in school, eschewing clan and domestic violence — aren’t thought to fully apply. This is nowhere more apparent than on the troubled streets of Alice Springs.

  • ‘Self-determination’ means ‘we’ll do what we like and you can pay for it’.
  • Self-determination’ is about colonising and taking control, accepting all that whitefellas have to offer while offering nothing in return.
  • Self-determination is about undermining whitefella institutions, judiciaries, organisations and bureaucracies.
  • Self-determination is about enculturated white people who, on the strength of what may be a mere speck of indigenous DNA, now identify exclusively as Aboriginal, thereby giving themselves an economic and social leg-up.

For the activist cadre it always was and always will be about money, power and control, all underscored by the notion that members of one race enjoy a preeminent ascendency over all other Australians.

More examples of ‘self-determination’ can be found in the ban on climbing Ayers Rock (Uluru), Mt Warning (Wollumbin), Mt Gillen, and many Grampians climbs, all for ill-defined or unexplained ‘cultural’ reasons’. After much outcry, consideration is now being given to re-opening the Mt Warning climb, but only for those who pay a fee and are escorted by indigenous guides. More rent-seeking, what a surprise!

Australian place names are also rapidly being overwritten with (most likely made-up) Aboriginal names (eg: K’gari, once known as Fraser Island). All of this is about claims to ownership, to ‘sovereignty’. These changes should not be mistaken for deference to Aboriginal culture; it’s no more nor less than an insidious takeover. What we are experiencing here is cultural guerrilla warfare, the picking off one target after the other. Don’t believe it? Look no further that what has happened in New Zealand.

The Voice:

Self-determination is not about ‘closing the gap’, nor Aborigines ‘having a voice’ — all of that can be achieved without a change to the Constitution. Indeed, the $35+ billion currently spent on Aboriginal affairs and the 11-plus current Aboriginal members of parliament are more than enough to fulfil both aims.

The Voice referendum is purely and simply about the drive towards Aboriginal sovereignty, which can only be achieved by changing the nation’s foundational document and charter.

Under the Albanese government, self-determination means the coming referendum, whose barely concealed intention is to divide Australia along lines of race. …

What is hiding in plain sight is the Albanese government’s intention to de-facto fund and promote the ‘Yes’ campaign whilst hamstringing ‘No’ advocates. Anything the No campaign says can and will be construed as “misinformation”. We have seen this already with the appalling attacks by Noel Pearson and Marcia Langton’s on Jacinta Price. Brace for much more of that — and wonder, too, if the bile and attempts at character assassination are a foretaste of an empowered Voice? …

Meanwhile, Australians are subjected to a daily and massive pro-Yes propaganda barrage by the taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS.

Remote Aboriginal Australians are unfortunate mascots in a power struggle among the white majority. The Voice is just the latest attempt by the left-bureaucratic class to get more control and further exploit the rest of us.

 

Anzac Day Trading Laws Under Review: A Call to Respond

The Anzac Day commemorations, a solemn day on the Australian calendar, has prompted the NSW government to reassess trading regulations for retail businesses. Their intent? To ensure that every Australian has the chance to participate in remembering the sacrifices made by their forefathers.

The Current State of Affairs

At present, certain businesses, like supermarkets and clothing outlets, must remain shut until at least 1pm on Anzac Day. Conversely, specific traders, such as cafes, pharmacies, and petrol stations, are free from this mandate. However, with the recent announcement of a review, there is growing anticipation around whether retail establishments should extend their closure on this significant day.

Industrial Relations Minister of NSW, Sophie Cotsis, emphasized the potential revision was initiated by an ongoing discourse regarding how the day is perceived and commemorated. She stressed the importance of enabling all Australians, including workers and business proprietors, to actively partake in time-honored traditions like Dawn Services, wreath laying, and veterans’ parades.

How Do Other States Fare?

Each state in Australia has a distinct approach to Anzac Day trading:

  • In states like NSW, Queensland, and Victoria, many stores, save for exempted ones, can commence business from 1pm onwards.
  • South Australia allows non-exempt businesses in CBDs to operate between 12pm to 5pm.
  • Tasmania mandates that businesses should not open their doors before 12.30pm.
  • Western Australia enforces the most stringent rules, prohibiting general retail stores, including supermarkets, from trading at all, although some smaller retail establishments and service stations have exemptions.
  • The Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory don’t impose any Anzac Day trading restrictions.

Your Voice Matters

Now, more than ever, is the opportunity for stakeholders to influence this potential change. Those who wish to voice their opinions can do so through the NSW Government’s ‘Have Your Say’ website or by sending an email to [email protected]. Submissions are accepted until October 20.

Minister Cotsis is particularly keen to garner feedback from various sectors, including business assemblies, unions, RSLs, and other interest groups. “The question is clear: Would the retail community and other entities value an extended window to observe and honour Anzac Day in NSW?” she asks.

It’s a call for the community and veterans to respond and ensure that the day remains both reflective and respectful for all Australians.

Taiwan Unveils First Domestically Produced Submarine, Marking a New Defence Era.

Picture: Taiwan’s first domestically made submarine. Photo: Presidential Office.

In a landmark move towards bolstering national defence and showcasing manufacturing prowess, Taiwan has launched its first domestically-produced submarine, named the “Hai Kun.” The unveiling of the diesel-electric “Narwhal” Hai Kun Class submarine took place on 28 September, a significant step that amplifies Taiwan’s naval capacities.

Key Features and Specifications

The state-of-the-art submarine is equipped with potent MK-48 Mod6 AT torpedoes and UGM-84L Harpoon anti-ship missiles, marking it as a formidable asset to Taiwan’s maritime arsenal.

High-Level Attendance at the Launch

The ceremony held in Kaohsiung saw the presence of several prominent figures. Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen led the event, flanked by Taiwan Shipbuilding Company chairman Zheng Wenlong and Navy Commander Tang Hua. During the event, President Tsai emphasized the critical role that such combat forces play in guarding Taiwan’s maritime territories.

Presidential Statements on Defence and Economic Growth

President Tsai stated, “Today will be etched in history. Crafting submarines domestically isn’t merely an ambition. It’s a tangible step towards staunchly defending our nation.”

Highlighting the submarine’s strategic importance, she elaborated, “Submarines are vital for the Navy of the Republic of China, enabling asymmetric combat capabilities. While we source defence equipment from abroad, it’s imperative we also champion national defence self-reliance. This ensures our defence mechanisms are always evolving and robust.”

Tsai further emphasized her administration’s commitment to domestic production of defence equipment, remarking that such initiatives not only bolster national security but also fuel industrial growth, thereby strengthening the nation’s economic fabric.

“We’ve seen technological advancements and R&D growth in related industries through our national shipbuilding plans over recent years,” she said. “A holistic defence industry supply chain is in formation, setting the trajectory for Taiwan’s shipbuilding sector to reach new heights.”

Projecting the future significance of the submarine, President Tsai envisaged the “Hai Kun” embodying Taiwan’s resilient spirit, silently safeguarding its shores, upholding its democratic values, and forging ahead amidst challenges.

Historical Context and Future Plans

The seeds for this submarine project were sown back in 2016 with the establishment of a submarine development centre. This was followed by a collaboration pact with the Ministry of National Defence in 2017. As part of a multi-billion-dollar initiative, Taiwan envisions adding eight more such vessels, strengthening its naval defence considerably.

China’s Reaction to the Announcement

The People’s Republic of China, always vocal about its stance on Taiwan, reacted promptly. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning reiterated during a press conference on 28 September that Taiwan remains an inseparable part of China.

Asserting China’s long-standing position, she declared, “The reunification of both sides of the Taiwan Strait is inevitable.” She also criticized the DPP authorities for their persistent stance on Taiwan’s independence and accused them of fostering discord across the Taiwan Strait, thereby risking the prevailing peace and stability.

 

 

 

Request from a Nasho to Nashos WA Group.

My name is Brien Stent service number 5714201, I was in the February 1966 Intake to Puckapunyal … then to 2 RAR, I have no photos, rightly or wrongly, I burnt them years ago.

My younger brother 5716371 PHILLIP DESMOND STENT also did National Service … Pucka (1968 I think) … then Armoured Corps APC driver with B Squadron 3 Cav Regt … he was severely wounded in Long Hais on the 18 Feb, 1970 … Phillip passed away 1987.… I have no photos of his time in NS or Vietnam. If any one does have any photos, I would really appreciate copies please. Best wishes.

If you can help with photograph please email Brian Stent, his email is [email protected]

Cheers

Bob McGuire

Nashos WA Group

Mobile 0402576086

www.wanashos.wikidot.com/

 

GET TOGETHER

WHO:  All those who were conscripted into the Army early October 1967 including wives and partners.

WHEN: For two weeks beginning 15 October 2023.

WHERE:  Sawtell Beach Holiday Park – 8ks south of Coffs Harbour NSW. Beautiful beaches and bush walks. Fishing.

LOOSE PROGRAM: Morning Smoko. Barefoot Bowls – Nashos versus visiting Regs. Trivia           Sessions for Richard Irons Memorial Trophy. Secret Women’s Business. Happy Hour – different venue each afternoon. Singalong & Pizzas in the Camp Kitchen. Splendid meals at the RSL, Bowling Club and Fishtales Restaurant. Croquet, Tennis and Disc Bowls.

NOTES:  Every second year we hold a more formal reunion at Sawtell incorporating a more formal memorial service followed by a big sit down hot breakfast at the RSL. More serious State of Origin events for the John Mason Memorial Trophy.

If anyone happens to be in the vicinity, please call in for a refreshment and meet some ageing Vietnam veterans from different units. Most welcome.

 

Richard Barry OAM

Facilitator.

[email protected]

WARNING ORDER

Julie and I are setting sail on a P&O cruise out of Brisbane to PNG along with two other couples. We booked this cruise back in January and will be away for 10 days. Consequently, there will be no website updates starting from this Tuesday. Although I intended to take my laptop, I was jokingly threatened with it being tossed overboard — you know the saying, “Happy wife, happy life.”

We’ll be back on 13th October, just in time to vote. While I regret being away especially so soon after the recent website shutdown the upgrade wasn’t scheduled around that time.

Please feel free to continue to send emails during my absence; I’ll review them upon my return. If anyone from our network is cruising out of Brisbane this Tuesday, please reach out!

In the meantime, please stay safe.

Ray

MRH90 Taipan grounded at last

In an unexpected decision, Australia has chosen to prematurely retire its fleet of NH Industries MRH90 Taipan multi-role helicopters. Throughout its 14 years of service with both the Australian Army and the Royal Australian Navy, the MRH90 Taipan encountered consistent issues, including poor availability and recurring fleet-wide groundings.

In response to these challenges, the Australian Army has decided to acquire off-the-shelf UH-60 Black Hawk combat utility helicopters as replacements. Meanwhile, the Royal Australian Navy has opted for an addition of 12 MH-60R Romeo Seahawk naval helicopters to replace the MRH90s.

Interestingly, the MRH90 Taipan was originally procured to replace the Australian Army’s S-70A Black Hawks. However, due to the availability issues with the MRH90, the retirement of the S-70A Black Hawks had to be postponed on multiple occasions.

In a broader shift, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) seems to be moving away from European to American helicopters. This transition is further exemplified by the Australian Army’s decision to replace its fleet of Eurocopter/Airbus EC665 Tiger attack helicopters ahead of schedule with the Boeing AH-64E Apache Guardian. Following these changes, the Eurocopter EC135 will stand as the lone ADF-owned European helicopter. It’s worth noting that while the ADF does operate several Leonardo AW139 helicopters, these are on a lease basis and will be returned to the lenders after a short duration.

Across the Tasman Sea, the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) also operates the NH90 helicopter. Intriguingly, they have not reported similar issues to those experienced by the ADF’s MRH90 Taipans.

We don’t need a voice we need a forensic audit.

The figures are based on the 2017 Indigenous Expenditure Report produced by the Productivity Commission. Source: Professor Matthew Bennett, spokesman for the Sovereign Court of International Justice (SCIJ) and International Barrister with a 25+ year legal career and an expert on international law.

There are:

3,278 Aboriginal corporations

243 Native title bodies

48 Land councils

35 Regional councils

122+ Aboriginal agencies

3 Advisory bodies

145 Health Organisations

11 Indigenous Federal MPs

12 Culturally important Indigenous days

PLUS:

Let’s review the data that is currently available in a clearer manner:

  1. Funding Amount and Population Percentage: Taxpayers contribute $33 billion annually to support 984,000 Indigenous Australians, which represent 3.8% of the country’s population.
  2. Expenditure Breakdown (2012-13):
    • Indigenous Australians: $43,449 per person
    • Non-Indigenous Australians: $20,900 per person

This shows that the expenditure on Indigenous Australians is 2.08 times that of non-Indigenous Australians, an increase from a 1.95 ratio in 2009.

  1. Daily and Annual Expenditure: Australian taxpayers spend approximately $100 million daily on direct support for Indigenous Australians, totaling $39.5 billion of direct government expenditure annually.
  2. Source of the Figures: The data is based on the 2017 Indigenous Expenditure Report produced by the Productivity Commission. The source is also credited to Professor Matthew Bennett from the Sovereign Court of International Justice (SCIJ).
  3. Representation in Parliament: The argument is made that there’s a proposal (or a current situation) where 3.8% of the population (Indigenous Australians) would get a “second voice” in Parliament, which the remaining 97.2% of the population won’t have access to due to not being First Nation individuals.

U.S. Navy’s Newest Flight III DDG 51 Destroyer, Equipped with Lasers, Begins Its Journey

Currently, the U.S. Navy operates over 80 destroyers. Their fleet is expanding with the addition of over 10 advanced Flight III DDG 51s. The goal for these warships? To tackle missions such as annihilating enemy drones and jets with laser weaponry, intercepting and destroying anti-ship and ballistic missiles, disrupting enemy radar, and deploying long-range precision weapons. These are just some tasks designed for the latest Arleigh Burke-class DDG 51 Flight III Destroyers.

The first of this class, the USS Jack Lucas (DDG 125), is now sailing from Mississippi to Tampa, Florida, marking its commissioning. This vessel represents a significant evolution in naval warfare, featuring laser weapons, revolutionary long-range sensors and radar, and state-of-the-art power storage and electricity systems.

These ships aim to incorporate a host of new technological advancements, in line with the Navy’s vision for a more distributed, lethal maritime warfare system. Former Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday emphasized the importance of quickly advancing these technologies, stating, “speed matters.”

He further elaborated in the Navy’s 2022 CNO NAVPLAN, “Advanced sensors, battle networks, and weapons have propelled us towards a more decentralized warfare approach… To maintain our edge, rapid deployment of top-tier systems is essential.”

This acceleration is crucial, especially considering the rapid naval advancements of the People’s Liberation Army – Navy.

For the most efficient integration, Navy weapon developers have been balancing swift implementation of new weapons with ensuring the use of cutting-edge technology. They’re achieving this through a “modular” strategy, which uses standard IP Protocol, interfaces, and computing systems, allowing continuous tech upgrades. Such software updates have previously enhanced radar systems, weapons guidance, and other crucial technologies, further expanding combat capabilities.

A pivotal upgrade in the Navy’s Block III DDG 51 is the AN/SPY-6 Air and Missile Defence Radar. This new radar system surpasses its predecessors, allowing Navy ships to detect or counteract targets with unprecedented accuracy and range. The SPY-6, in particular, is 30 times more efficient than the SPY-1D(V), as cited by the “Microwave Journal.”

Moreover, Raytheon’s SPY-6 radar uses Gallium Nitride (GaN), a military-grade material that’s up to 1,000 times more efficient than the current Gallium Arsenide.

In practical terms, the SPY-6 radar system integrates different fire-control and detection techs, providing commanders with a more extended decision-making window during potential multi-faceted enemy attacks, including ballistic missiles, drones, and more.

 

 

BSE Systems Demonstrates T600 in World First.

Pictures provided by BSE Systems

In a groundbreaking development during a recent NATO exercise off Portugal’s coast, naval drone technology witnessed an unprecedented evolution. The BAE Systems/Malloy Aeronautics T-600 heavy lift Uncrewed Air System (UAS) successfully air-launched an inert Sting Ray training torpedo, marking a significant leap in naval drone applications.

Around the globe, major naval forces have been consistently investing in and observing the development of aerial drones. As these machines grow in sophistication, they’re being designed to fulfill diverse roles. This not only enables them to seamlessly integrate into more specialized tasks but also allows human resources to be allocated to more critical operations.

This particular test was part of NATO’s Robotic Experimentation and Prototyping with Maritime Uncrewed Systems (REPMUS) 2023 exercise. A series of demonstrations were presented for delegates from NATO member countries as well as from non-member nations like Ireland and Sweden.

The standout moment was undoubtedly the release of the Sting Ray training model of the anti-submarine torpedo from the T-600 drone. This marked the inaugural instance of an anti-submarine weapon being released by a drone in a maritime mission. The goal of this exercise was twofold: it was an opportunity to showcase the T-600’s prowess in anti-submarine warfare, and it also demonstrated the drone’s versatility. Its potential roles span from automated logistics and resupply missions to casualty evacuation. One of the most compelling features is the T-600’s minimal environmental impact, made all the more impressive by the fact that it operates without human pilots.

BAE Systems has disclosed that this technological feat with the T-600 is merely a stepping stone towards their next venture, the T-650. This upcoming model is set to be an all-electric heavy lift UAS equipped with rapid reconfiguration features tailored for various applications, including military, commercial, and humanitarian missions.

Reflecting on the swift progress, Neil Appleton, Head of Sustainable Electric Products at BAE Systems Air, remarked, “In a mere two-year span following the commencement of our partnership with Malloy, we’ve rolled out a heavy lift UAS. Moreover, in collaboration with the UK Royal Navy and the Portuguese Navy, we’ve actively participated in the latest NATO REPMUS exercise. This demonstration was a spectacular opportunity to exhibit the prowess of our T-600 technology demonstrator, as it successfully carried an inert Sting Ray torpedo in the presence of some of the world’s most elite naval forces.”