Get ready to dive into the future of Toyota as it’s developing a new Water powered engine to destroy its competition. In today’s video, we will explore the concept of Water Engines and its plan to dominate the entire automotive industry with its help.
Wait and watch as the big mining companies smother this plan.
The Duty First Podcast Trailer is OUT NOW at www.dutyfirstpodcast.com.au
Happy 75th RAR and thank you to all those who helped put our first 75 years into this great piece of living history!
Celebrate 75 years of the Royal Australian Regiment launching 23 November 2023.
Australian Army conducted a demonstration of autonomous and uncrewed systems including swarms.
The History of the Armed Forces of Châu Duc District (1945-2014), 2014 – is a very professional and glossy publication. It includes several photographs – however some are “mislabelled” – such as below:
“Australian troops recovering the body of a comrade”
That photograph however is a “cropped” copy of the renown US “Agony of War” photograph. ie of US troops (4th Battalion/503rd Regiment/173d Airborne Brigade) taken on 14 August 1966 by PFC Paul Epley during Operation Toledo south of Gia Ray in Long Khánh Province (vic YS 791932). The “un-cropped” photograph is below:
US “Agony of War” (full photograph) – 173d Airborne Brigade, 14 August 1966
Right to left: SP4 Ruediger Richter, PFC Daryl R. Corfman (in the poncho/body-bag), and SGT D.E. Spencer. (see the 173d Airborne Brigade Operation Toledo report at US Defense Technical
Information Centre – Report AD510789).
Note however, that the photograph is correctly captioned by communist historians: as “173d Airborne Brigade” troops in Trần Văn Khánh (et al/đtg) and: Ban Chấp Hành Đảng bộ tỉnh Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu (Executive Committee of the Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu Party), Lịch sử Đảng bộ tỉnh Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu 1930 – 1975 (The History of the Party in Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu Province 1930-1975), Nhà Xuất bản Chính trị Quốc gia (National Political Publishing House), Hà Nội, 2000.
The VC Châu Đức District covered the “western-half”- and some of the north-eastern part, of the Saigon
Government’s Phước Tuy Province. If readers would like a complimentary copy of the research note:
“Communist Views of the 1st Australian Task Force (2020, 2023) – 101 pages with maps and photographs,
email Ernie Chamberlain @ [email protected].
The Spectator Australia
LEAD ARTICLE
There is a rather delicious irony in the timing of Sky News’s documentary about the chaos, destabilisation, backstabbing and all-round mayhem of the Turnbull/Morrison years. In the last few weeks, the Coalition under Peter Dutton is finally resembling the conservative powerhouses of the Howard government and Abbott opposition; certainly for the first time since Machiavellian Malcolm and Lady Julie Macbeth began their dastardly plotting and treachery back in 2014. As readers of this magazine have known all along, the problem within both the Liberal and National parties has been the bedwetting brigade, and the damage they have done to this nation. Nothing else.
The antidote to chaos and confusion is of course conviction. Under the leadership of Mr Dutton, ably helped by the Nationals, the Coalition found their mojo when they decided to oppose the Voice. As we argued at the time, this symbolised much more than taking a side in a constitutional referendum. Rather, it was the first moment since the election of Tony Abbott that the centre-right genuinely stood for something and was prepared to fight on a point of principle. It would now appear, again as we predicted, that having enjoyed such success on 14 October, comprehensively trouncing the combined forces of political, bureaucratic, academic, corporate and media wokery, Mr Dutton and the Coalition have found a taste for it. Welcome to the culture wars, ladies and gentlemen.
From the moment the world first heard of the horrors, the murders and the barbaric rampage by an indescribably evil mob of Hamas and Palestinian thugs on 7 October, Anthony Albanese’s Labor government has been completely at sea, rudderless and floundering in an ocean of political correctness, self-interest and antisemitism. Ministers have contradicted each other, making ignorant and dangerous accusations of ‘collective punishment’, insultingly preaching to Israel to ‘follow international law’ (as if they weren’t already doing so), banging on about quasi-fabricated ‘Islamophobia’ and engaging at every opportunity in the sinister game of moral equivalency between Hamas and the Israelis.
In contrast to Labor, whose default position appears to be indistinguishable from that of your average flag-waving undergraduate activist, the Liberal party under Peter Dutton is clear in its convictions and unswerving in its support for Israel. This is to be applauded. Not because Israel is an important ally, which it is, nor because Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation, which it also is, but because political leadership demands from time to time moral leadership. And moral clarity. To wit; there was a ceasefire and it was broken on 7 October by Hamas.
To quote one of Australia’s greatest journalists, now living in New York, Miranda Devine: ‘War is hell but it really isn’t hard to know which side to support –and it’s not the one that bakes a baby alive in an oven, gang rapes women, and hacks an injured man’s head off with a shovel.’
Peter Dutton’s call for a national cabinet on antisemitism is a smart idea built on strong principles. This magazine is not a fan of national cabinets per se, but in this instance we recognise the importance. Equally important has been Mr Dutton’s criticism of the High Court decision to release into our community a bunch of serious criminals and his opposition to the Prime Minister’s endless overseas engagements which increasingly appear to be nothing more than a desperate attempt to avoid being anywhere near his colleagues. A sentiment we can only sympathise with.
Mr Dutton is heading towards the Lodge. If he sticks to his guns on these and other issues, such as on energy (we urge to him abandon net zero) and the economy, that path will become ever easier.
The commander of an Australian warship has been relieved of duty amid an ongoing inquiry into alleged misconduct related to the prohibited consumption of alcohol at sea. The Defense department has confirmed the removal of the senior officer from command of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) vessel, citing concerns about “unacceptable behavior.” Details regarding the incident remain undisclosed due to privacy obligations.
A defense spokesperson emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating that there is no tolerance for unacceptable behavior within the military. They assured that all allegations are treated seriously and subjected to thorough investigation in accordance with due process.
Military sources reveal that the commander is under investigation for “heavy drinking” during naval operations and an incident at an international event that reportedly caused embarrassment in the presence of United States Navy counterparts. Some insiders claim that the RAN is attempting to conceal the episode, alleging a departure from standard procedures for the transfer of command.
In response to questions, Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Mark Hammond, declined to comment on the specifics of the incident but affirmed that the organization is addressing the matter appropriately. He highlighted the high expectations placed on command teams, emphasizing a culture of high performance, strong reporting, and accountability.
While the Defense department remains tight-lipped about the details, it is known that the consumption of alcohol at sea is generally restricted to special occasions, with ANZAC Day being an exception where sailors, excluding officers, are provided with a limited “beer issue” as per current Navy regulations.
The B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. (U.S. Air Force photo)
The highly anticipated B-21 Raider has successfully completed its inaugural test flight, marking a significant milestone as the first public flight of a sixth-generation combat aircraft. Developed by Northrop Grumman, the B-21 Raider is heralded as the world’s “first sixth-generation aircraft” and a transformative advancement for the US Air Force’s global strike capabilities.
Unveiled on December 2, 2022, at Northrop Grumman’s Palmdale, California facility, the B-21 Raider is set to replace the aging B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers, serving as the cornerstone of the US Air Force’s strategic bomber force. The maiden flight, originating from the Northrop Grumman Plant 42 facility in Palmdale, California, showcased the aircraft’s smaller size compared to its predecessor, the B-2 Spirit, along with two large bomb bays and an array of sensor suites.
The Raider platform is designed to usher in a new era of capability and flexibility through advanced integration of data, sensors, and weapons. It possesses the capability to deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads, employing a mix of stand-off and direct attack munitions to establish itself as one of the most effective aircraft in the sky.
Since the contract award in 2015, Northrop Grumman has mobilized a nationwide team of over 8,000 individuals, including industry partners and Air Force personnel across 40 US states, to design and build the world’s most advanced strike aircraft. The B-21 Raider, part of a larger family of systems, is crucial to America’s national strategic deterrence strategy, providing advanced long-range precision strike capabilities and additional functionalities like intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, electronic attack, and multi-domain networking capabilities.
The digital ecosystem supporting the B-21 Raider throughout its life cycle facilitates through-life maintenance, sustainment, and upgrade cost reductions, enabling rapid technology upgrades to stay ahead of future threats.
The US Air Force plans to order a minimum of 100 B-21 Raiders to modernize its aging fleet of B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers, ensuring a credible and survivable airborne strategic strike capability.
The Common Debt of Australia has deep roots in the economic transformations witnessed over the past 40 years. In this relatively short span, Australia has undergone a drastic shift from a thriving, self-sufficient nation to one grappling with significant economic challenges.
Not too long ago, prosperity was abundant, with jobs readily available throughout the country. Families thrived on a single income, and iconic industries such as iron ore, steel, shipbuilding, and car manufacturing, including renowned brands like Holden, Chrysler, Mitsubishi, Toyota, and Ford, fuelled the nation’s economic engine. Australia proudly manufactured a diverse range of products, from household appliances to vehicles, fostering a sense of national pride with the label “PROUDLY MADE IN AUSTRALIA.”
Rural towns were vibrant hubs connected by an extensive rail network, and local businesses, including corner stores, milk bars, and hardware shops, thrived. Flea markets dotted the weekends, offering fresh and local produce. Public utilities like power stations, water, and gas employed thousands, ensuring affordability, and sustaining various industries nationwide.
However, the narrative took a turn as the government shifted its approach, corporatizing itself and engaging in direct competition with private enterprises. Local councils expanded their reach, acquiring tourist parks and dictating terms to others, leading to a decline in community strength.
The downward spiral accelerated with the outsourcing of industries and businesses, facilitated by free trade agreements that allowed foreign competitors to flood the Australian market with cheap, sub-standard products. The once tight-knit community, marked by mutual respect and a friendly “G’day,” began to erode, replaced by security screens, burglar alarms, and a pervasive sense of fear and stress.
Foreign countries entered the scene, acquiring Australian resources, displacing farmers, and taking over power stations. Educational funding was cut, trade skills teaching slowed, and 457 visas were introduced, replacing skilled workers with cheaper foreign labour. The sale of public assets, such as forests, to foreign owners further weakened the nation.
To compensate for lost income, the government introduced new taxes, levies, and funding cuts to essential services like emergency services, police, and public housing. The public was burdened with additional costs, including the controversial Goods and Services Tax (GST). Meanwhile, politicians enjoyed hefty pay raises, seemingly disconnected from the struggles faced by ordinary Australians.
Now facing a massive debt, the government urges citizens to tighten their belts, forcing the elderly back into the workforce until the age of 70. The once-mighty manufacturing plants now stand as empty monuments to a bygone era, and the ubiquitous “MADE IN CHINA” label serves as a painful reminder that the nation is funding its own demise.
As the government grapples with financial challenges, the question lingers: How did this once self-sufficient nation fall so far, and what will it take to reclaim its former glory?